Public involvement in health priority setting

future challenges for policy, research and society

David James Hunter, Katharina Kieslich, Peter Littlejohns, Sophie Staniszewska, Emma Tumilty, Albert Weale, Iestyn Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the findings of this special issue and discusses the future challenges for policy, research and society. The findings suggest that challenges emerge as a result of legitimacy deficits of both consensus and contestatory modes of public involvement in health priority setting. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws on the discussions and findings presented in this special issue. It seeks to bring the country experiences and case studies together to draw conclusions for policy, research and society. Findings – At least two recurring themes emerge. An underlying theme is the importance, but also the challenge, of establishing legitimacy in health priority setting. The country experiences suggest that we understand very little about the conditions under which representative, or authentic, participation generates legitimacy and under which it will be regarded as insufficient. A second observation is that public participation takes a variety of forms that depend on the opportunity structures in a given national context. Given this variety the conceptualization of public participation needs to be expanded to account for the many forms of public participation. Originality/value – The paper concludes that the challenges of public involvement are closely linked to the question of how legitimate processes and decisions can be generated in priority setting. This suggests that future research must focus more narrowly on conditions under which legitimacy are generated in order to expand the understanding of public involvement in health prioritization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)796-808
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Health, Organisation and Management
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Illegitimacy
Health Priorities
Research
Observation
Priority setting
Legitimacy
Health
Policy research
Public involvement
Community Participation
Public participation

Keywords

  • Authentic representation
  • Equitable health coverage
  • Legitimacy
  • Priority setting
  • Public participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Hunter, D. J., Kieslich, K., Littlejohns, P., Staniszewska, S., Tumilty, E., Weale, A., & Williams, I. (2016). Public involvement in health priority setting: future challenges for policy, research and society. Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, 30(5), 796-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-04-2016-0057

Public involvement in health priority setting : future challenges for policy, research and society. / Hunter, David James; Kieslich, Katharina; Littlejohns, Peter; Staniszewska, Sophie; Tumilty, Emma; Weale, Albert; Williams, Iestyn.

In: Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, Vol. 30, No. 5, 15.08.2016, p. 796-808.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Hunter, DJ, Kieslich, K, Littlejohns, P, Staniszewska, S, Tumilty, E, Weale, A & Williams, I 2016, 'Public involvement in health priority setting: future challenges for policy, research and society', Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 796-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-04-2016-0057
Hunter, David James ; Kieslich, Katharina ; Littlejohns, Peter ; Staniszewska, Sophie ; Tumilty, Emma ; Weale, Albert ; Williams, Iestyn. / Public involvement in health priority setting : future challenges for policy, research and society. In: Journal of Health, Organisation and Management. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 796-808.
@article{e2b6b04890ca4ec3a356141029bc03f9,
title = "Public involvement in health priority setting: future challenges for policy, research and society",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the findings of this special issue and discusses the future challenges for policy, research and society. The findings suggest that challenges emerge as a result of legitimacy deficits of both consensus and contestatory modes of public involvement in health priority setting. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws on the discussions and findings presented in this special issue. It seeks to bring the country experiences and case studies together to draw conclusions for policy, research and society. Findings – At least two recurring themes emerge. An underlying theme is the importance, but also the challenge, of establishing legitimacy in health priority setting. The country experiences suggest that we understand very little about the conditions under which representative, or authentic, participation generates legitimacy and under which it will be regarded as insufficient. A second observation is that public participation takes a variety of forms that depend on the opportunity structures in a given national context. Given this variety the conceptualization of public participation needs to be expanded to account for the many forms of public participation. Originality/value – The paper concludes that the challenges of public involvement are closely linked to the question of how legitimate processes and decisions can be generated in priority setting. This suggests that future research must focus more narrowly on conditions under which legitimacy are generated in order to expand the understanding of public involvement in health prioritization.",
keywords = "Authentic representation, Equitable health coverage, Legitimacy, Priority setting, Public participation",
author = "Hunter, {David James} and Katharina Kieslich and Peter Littlejohns and Sophie Staniszewska and Emma Tumilty and Albert Weale and Iestyn Williams",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1108/JHOM-04-2016-0057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "796--808",
journal = "Journal of Health Organization and Management",
issn = "1477-7266",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public involvement in health priority setting

T2 - future challenges for policy, research and society

AU - Hunter, David James

AU - Kieslich, Katharina

AU - Littlejohns, Peter

AU - Staniszewska, Sophie

AU - Tumilty, Emma

AU - Weale, Albert

AU - Williams, Iestyn

PY - 2016/8/15

Y1 - 2016/8/15

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the findings of this special issue and discusses the future challenges for policy, research and society. The findings suggest that challenges emerge as a result of legitimacy deficits of both consensus and contestatory modes of public involvement in health priority setting. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws on the discussions and findings presented in this special issue. It seeks to bring the country experiences and case studies together to draw conclusions for policy, research and society. Findings – At least two recurring themes emerge. An underlying theme is the importance, but also the challenge, of establishing legitimacy in health priority setting. The country experiences suggest that we understand very little about the conditions under which representative, or authentic, participation generates legitimacy and under which it will be regarded as insufficient. A second observation is that public participation takes a variety of forms that depend on the opportunity structures in a given national context. Given this variety the conceptualization of public participation needs to be expanded to account for the many forms of public participation. Originality/value – The paper concludes that the challenges of public involvement are closely linked to the question of how legitimate processes and decisions can be generated in priority setting. This suggests that future research must focus more narrowly on conditions under which legitimacy are generated in order to expand the understanding of public involvement in health prioritization.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the findings of this special issue and discusses the future challenges for policy, research and society. The findings suggest that challenges emerge as a result of legitimacy deficits of both consensus and contestatory modes of public involvement in health priority setting. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws on the discussions and findings presented in this special issue. It seeks to bring the country experiences and case studies together to draw conclusions for policy, research and society. Findings – At least two recurring themes emerge. An underlying theme is the importance, but also the challenge, of establishing legitimacy in health priority setting. The country experiences suggest that we understand very little about the conditions under which representative, or authentic, participation generates legitimacy and under which it will be regarded as insufficient. A second observation is that public participation takes a variety of forms that depend on the opportunity structures in a given national context. Given this variety the conceptualization of public participation needs to be expanded to account for the many forms of public participation. Originality/value – The paper concludes that the challenges of public involvement are closely linked to the question of how legitimate processes and decisions can be generated in priority setting. This suggests that future research must focus more narrowly on conditions under which legitimacy are generated in order to expand the understanding of public involvement in health prioritization.

KW - Authentic representation

KW - Equitable health coverage

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Priority setting

KW - Public participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979934268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979934268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JHOM-04-2016-0057

DO - 10.1108/JHOM-04-2016-0057

M3 - Review article

VL - 30

SP - 796

EP - 808

JO - Journal of Health Organization and Management

JF - Journal of Health Organization and Management

SN - 1477-7266

IS - 5

ER -