Quadriceps augmentation of undersized hamstrings during ACL reconstruction

W. Kyle Wilson, Randal Morris, Andrew Coskey, Brian Smith, Zbigniew Gugala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Double hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a well-established graft option; however, a major concern with this method arises when the prepared graft is too small. Resorting to allograft can be a solution to this problem, but some surgeons prefer to use autograft in particular situations and some patients may refuse allograft. We investigate the merits of using autogenous quadriceps tendons to augment the insufficient hamstrings and compare the autograft composite graft to a standard hamstrings graft of equal size. Methods: Semitendinosus, gracilis, and quadriceps tendons were harvested from 10 matched pairs of human cadaver lower extremities. Within each pair, a routine hamstring ACL graft (control) consisting of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, and an quadriceps augmented hamstrings graft of equal size comprised of the semitendinosus and quadriceps tendons, were prepared. A freeze-clamp mount was used to biomechanically test each graft construct. Tensile failure load, displacement, energy absorbed, and stiffness were determined and statistically compared within each pair and mode of graft failure was established. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the quadriceps augmented hamstrings graft versus standard control grafts. Average values for peak failure load and graft displacement at the point of first failure were nearly identical. All ACL graft constructs failed at the mid-substance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates no statistical difference in the biomechanical properties of an isolated hamstring ACL autograft versus a quadriceps augmented ACL autograft of equal size at time zero. Clinical relevance: This is a potentially new and reliable method for quadriceps tendon autograft augmentation of hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalKnee
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Transplants
Autografts
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Tendons
Allografts
Cadaver
Lower Extremity

Keywords

  • ACL autograft
  • ACL graft
  • ACL reconstruction
  • Quadriceps tendon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Quadriceps augmentation of undersized hamstrings during ACL reconstruction. / Wilson, W. Kyle; Morris, Randal; Coskey, Andrew; Smith, Brian; Gugala, Zbigniew.

In: Knee, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d2609e8f21dc40d4a0ce7ca72d820ee5,
title = "Quadriceps augmentation of undersized hamstrings during ACL reconstruction",
abstract = "Background: Double hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a well-established graft option; however, a major concern with this method arises when the prepared graft is too small. Resorting to allograft can be a solution to this problem, but some surgeons prefer to use autograft in particular situations and some patients may refuse allograft. We investigate the merits of using autogenous quadriceps tendons to augment the insufficient hamstrings and compare the autograft composite graft to a standard hamstrings graft of equal size. Methods: Semitendinosus, gracilis, and quadriceps tendons were harvested from 10 matched pairs of human cadaver lower extremities. Within each pair, a routine hamstring ACL graft (control) consisting of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, and an quadriceps augmented hamstrings graft of equal size comprised of the semitendinosus and quadriceps tendons, were prepared. A freeze-clamp mount was used to biomechanically test each graft construct. Tensile failure load, displacement, energy absorbed, and stiffness were determined and statistically compared within each pair and mode of graft failure was established. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the quadriceps augmented hamstrings graft versus standard control grafts. Average values for peak failure load and graft displacement at the point of first failure were nearly identical. All ACL graft constructs failed at the mid-substance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates no statistical difference in the biomechanical properties of an isolated hamstring ACL autograft versus a quadriceps augmented ACL autograft of equal size at time zero. Clinical relevance: This is a potentially new and reliable method for quadriceps tendon autograft augmentation of hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction.",
keywords = "ACL autograft, ACL graft, ACL reconstruction, Quadriceps tendon",
author = "Wilson, {W. Kyle} and Randal Morris and Andrew Coskey and Brian Smith and Zbigniew Gugala",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.knee.2018.11.012",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Knee",
issn = "0968-0160",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quadriceps augmentation of undersized hamstrings during ACL reconstruction

AU - Wilson, W. Kyle

AU - Morris, Randal

AU - Coskey, Andrew

AU - Smith, Brian

AU - Gugala, Zbigniew

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Double hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a well-established graft option; however, a major concern with this method arises when the prepared graft is too small. Resorting to allograft can be a solution to this problem, but some surgeons prefer to use autograft in particular situations and some patients may refuse allograft. We investigate the merits of using autogenous quadriceps tendons to augment the insufficient hamstrings and compare the autograft composite graft to a standard hamstrings graft of equal size. Methods: Semitendinosus, gracilis, and quadriceps tendons were harvested from 10 matched pairs of human cadaver lower extremities. Within each pair, a routine hamstring ACL graft (control) consisting of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, and an quadriceps augmented hamstrings graft of equal size comprised of the semitendinosus and quadriceps tendons, were prepared. A freeze-clamp mount was used to biomechanically test each graft construct. Tensile failure load, displacement, energy absorbed, and stiffness were determined and statistically compared within each pair and mode of graft failure was established. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the quadriceps augmented hamstrings graft versus standard control grafts. Average values for peak failure load and graft displacement at the point of first failure were nearly identical. All ACL graft constructs failed at the mid-substance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates no statistical difference in the biomechanical properties of an isolated hamstring ACL autograft versus a quadriceps augmented ACL autograft of equal size at time zero. Clinical relevance: This is a potentially new and reliable method for quadriceps tendon autograft augmentation of hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction.

AB - Background: Double hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a well-established graft option; however, a major concern with this method arises when the prepared graft is too small. Resorting to allograft can be a solution to this problem, but some surgeons prefer to use autograft in particular situations and some patients may refuse allograft. We investigate the merits of using autogenous quadriceps tendons to augment the insufficient hamstrings and compare the autograft composite graft to a standard hamstrings graft of equal size. Methods: Semitendinosus, gracilis, and quadriceps tendons were harvested from 10 matched pairs of human cadaver lower extremities. Within each pair, a routine hamstring ACL graft (control) consisting of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, and an quadriceps augmented hamstrings graft of equal size comprised of the semitendinosus and quadriceps tendons, were prepared. A freeze-clamp mount was used to biomechanically test each graft construct. Tensile failure load, displacement, energy absorbed, and stiffness were determined and statistically compared within each pair and mode of graft failure was established. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the quadriceps augmented hamstrings graft versus standard control grafts. Average values for peak failure load and graft displacement at the point of first failure were nearly identical. All ACL graft constructs failed at the mid-substance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates no statistical difference in the biomechanical properties of an isolated hamstring ACL autograft versus a quadriceps augmented ACL autograft of equal size at time zero. Clinical relevance: This is a potentially new and reliable method for quadriceps tendon autograft augmentation of hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction.

KW - ACL autograft

KW - ACL graft

KW - ACL reconstruction

KW - Quadriceps tendon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058245221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058245221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.knee.2018.11.012

DO - 10.1016/j.knee.2018.11.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 30554907

AN - SCOPUS:85058245221

JO - Knee

JF - Knee

SN - 0968-0160

ER -