Quality measures in high-risk pregnancies: Executive Summary of a Cooperative Workshop of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Brian K. Iriye, Kimberly D. Gregory, George Saade, William A. Grobman, Haywood L. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Providers perceive current obstetric quality measures as imperfect and insufficient. Our organizations convened a "Quality Measures in High-Risk Pregnancies Workshop." The goals were to (1) review the current landscape regarding quality measures in obstetric conditions with increased risk for adverse maternal or fetal outcomes, (2) evaluate the available evidence for management of common obstetric conditions to identify those that may drive the highest impact on outcomes, quality, and value, (3) propose measures for high-risk obstetric conditions that reflect enhanced quality and efficiency, and (4) identify current research gaps, improve methods of data collection, and recommend means of change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.)
High-Risk Pregnancy
Obstetrics
Education
Mothers
Organizations
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

@article{7b541b7ac7844fc18d7e2f9cb0d8dc31,
title = "Quality measures in high-risk pregnancies: Executive Summary of a Cooperative Workshop of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists",
abstract = "Providers perceive current obstetric quality measures as imperfect and insufficient. Our organizations convened a {"}Quality Measures in High-Risk Pregnancies Workshop.{"} The goals were to (1) review the current landscape regarding quality measures in obstetric conditions with increased risk for adverse maternal or fetal outcomes, (2) evaluate the available evidence for management of common obstetric conditions to identify those that may drive the highest impact on outcomes, quality, and value, (3) propose measures for high-risk obstetric conditions that reflect enhanced quality and efficiency, and (4) identify current research gaps, improve methods of data collection, and recommend means of change.",
author = "Iriye, {Brian K.} and Gregory, {Kimberly D.} and George Saade and Grobman, {William A.} and Brown, {Haywood L.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.018",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality measures in high-risk pregnancies

T2 - Executive Summary of a Cooperative Workshop of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

AU - Iriye, Brian K.

AU - Gregory, Kimberly D.

AU - Saade, George

AU - Grobman, William A.

AU - Brown, Haywood L.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Providers perceive current obstetric quality measures as imperfect and insufficient. Our organizations convened a "Quality Measures in High-Risk Pregnancies Workshop." The goals were to (1) review the current landscape regarding quality measures in obstetric conditions with increased risk for adverse maternal or fetal outcomes, (2) evaluate the available evidence for management of common obstetric conditions to identify those that may drive the highest impact on outcomes, quality, and value, (3) propose measures for high-risk obstetric conditions that reflect enhanced quality and efficiency, and (4) identify current research gaps, improve methods of data collection, and recommend means of change.

AB - Providers perceive current obstetric quality measures as imperfect and insufficient. Our organizations convened a "Quality Measures in High-Risk Pregnancies Workshop." The goals were to (1) review the current landscape regarding quality measures in obstetric conditions with increased risk for adverse maternal or fetal outcomes, (2) evaluate the available evidence for management of common obstetric conditions to identify those that may drive the highest impact on outcomes, quality, and value, (3) propose measures for high-risk obstetric conditions that reflect enhanced quality and efficiency, and (4) identify current research gaps, improve methods of data collection, and recommend means of change.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028451273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028451273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 28735702

AN - SCOPUS:85028451273

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

ER -