Quantitative reviewing of medical literature. An approach to synthesizing research results in clinical pediatrics.

Kenneth Ottenbacher, P. Petersen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The quantitative literature review is presented as a unique type of research endeavor complete with formal stages that parallel those associated with primary or experimental research. This article provides a tutorial overview of the quantitative literature review procedure and, in conjunction with the companion article published in this issue, serves to illustrate the application of this technique in the review process. The stages in quantitative review include: (1) problem formation; (2) data collection; (3) data evaluation; (4) analysis and interpretation; and (5) reporting results. It is argued that inferences made in the research review process are as central to the establishment of valid biomedical and clinical knowledge as inferences made in primary research. Despite some limitations, quantitative reviewing procedures constitute a significant advance over the traditional narrative methods of integrating empirical research in an area of interest. The use of quantitative reviewing procedures represents a paradigm shift in which the literature review is conceptualized as a unique form of scientific inquiry complete with formal stages and methods. The adoption of these methods should assist researchers in the behavioral and biomedical sciences in establishing scientifically valid data bases to guide theory development and direct future clinical investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-427
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Pediatrics
Volume23
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Research
Behavioral Sciences
Empirical Research
Research Personnel
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Quantitative reviewing of medical literature. An approach to synthesizing research results in clinical pediatrics. / Ottenbacher, Kenneth; Petersen, P.

In: Clinical Pediatrics, Vol. 23, No. 8, 08.1984, p. 423-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2bbf098f49047c7abccada4bfb4761a,
title = "Quantitative reviewing of medical literature. An approach to synthesizing research results in clinical pediatrics.",
abstract = "The quantitative literature review is presented as a unique type of research endeavor complete with formal stages that parallel those associated with primary or experimental research. This article provides a tutorial overview of the quantitative literature review procedure and, in conjunction with the companion article published in this issue, serves to illustrate the application of this technique in the review process. The stages in quantitative review include: (1) problem formation; (2) data collection; (3) data evaluation; (4) analysis and interpretation; and (5) reporting results. It is argued that inferences made in the research review process are as central to the establishment of valid biomedical and clinical knowledge as inferences made in primary research. Despite some limitations, quantitative reviewing procedures constitute a significant advance over the traditional narrative methods of integrating empirical research in an area of interest. The use of quantitative reviewing procedures represents a paradigm shift in which the literature review is conceptualized as a unique form of scientific inquiry complete with formal stages and methods. The adoption of these methods should assist researchers in the behavioral and biomedical sciences in establishing scientifically valid data bases to guide theory development and direct future clinical investigation.",
author = "Kenneth Ottenbacher and P. Petersen",
year = "1984",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "423--427",
journal = "Clinical Pediatrics",
issn = "0009-9228",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative reviewing of medical literature. An approach to synthesizing research results in clinical pediatrics.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Petersen, P.

PY - 1984/8

Y1 - 1984/8

N2 - The quantitative literature review is presented as a unique type of research endeavor complete with formal stages that parallel those associated with primary or experimental research. This article provides a tutorial overview of the quantitative literature review procedure and, in conjunction with the companion article published in this issue, serves to illustrate the application of this technique in the review process. The stages in quantitative review include: (1) problem formation; (2) data collection; (3) data evaluation; (4) analysis and interpretation; and (5) reporting results. It is argued that inferences made in the research review process are as central to the establishment of valid biomedical and clinical knowledge as inferences made in primary research. Despite some limitations, quantitative reviewing procedures constitute a significant advance over the traditional narrative methods of integrating empirical research in an area of interest. The use of quantitative reviewing procedures represents a paradigm shift in which the literature review is conceptualized as a unique form of scientific inquiry complete with formal stages and methods. The adoption of these methods should assist researchers in the behavioral and biomedical sciences in establishing scientifically valid data bases to guide theory development and direct future clinical investigation.

AB - The quantitative literature review is presented as a unique type of research endeavor complete with formal stages that parallel those associated with primary or experimental research. This article provides a tutorial overview of the quantitative literature review procedure and, in conjunction with the companion article published in this issue, serves to illustrate the application of this technique in the review process. The stages in quantitative review include: (1) problem formation; (2) data collection; (3) data evaluation; (4) analysis and interpretation; and (5) reporting results. It is argued that inferences made in the research review process are as central to the establishment of valid biomedical and clinical knowledge as inferences made in primary research. Despite some limitations, quantitative reviewing procedures constitute a significant advance over the traditional narrative methods of integrating empirical research in an area of interest. The use of quantitative reviewing procedures represents a paradigm shift in which the literature review is conceptualized as a unique form of scientific inquiry complete with formal stages and methods. The adoption of these methods should assist researchers in the behavioral and biomedical sciences in establishing scientifically valid data bases to guide theory development and direct future clinical investigation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021481819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021481819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6734016

AN - SCOPUS:0021481819

VL - 23

SP - 423

EP - 427

JO - Clinical Pediatrics

JF - Clinical Pediatrics

SN - 0009-9228

IS - 8

ER -