Quantitative reviewing: The literature review as scientific inquiry

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The literature review process is conceptualized as a form of scientific inquiry that involves methodological requirements and inferences similar to those employed in primary research. Five stages of quantitative reviewing that parallel stages in primary investigation are identified and briefly described. They include problem formation, data collection, data evaluation, analysis and interpretation, and reporting the results. The first two stages provide information and guidelines relevant to reviewers' employing traditional narrative procedures or conducting reviews of qualitative research literature. The final three stages relate specifically to the methodology of quantitative reviewing. The argument is made that quantitative reviewing procedures represent a paradigm shift that can assist researchers and clinicians in occupational therapy to establish a scientific data base that will serve to guide theory development and validate clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
Pages313-319
Number of pages7
Volume37
Edition5
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Qualitative Research
Occupational Therapy
Research Personnel
Databases
Guidelines
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ottenbacher, K. (1983). Quantitative reviewing: The literature review as scientific inquiry. In American Journal of Occupational Therapy (5 ed., Vol. 37, pp. 313-319)

Quantitative reviewing : The literature review as scientific inquiry. / Ottenbacher, Kenneth.

American Journal of Occupational Therapy. Vol. 37 5. ed. 1983. p. 313-319.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Ottenbacher, K 1983, Quantitative reviewing: The literature review as scientific inquiry. in American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 5 edn, vol. 37, pp. 313-319.
Ottenbacher K. Quantitative reviewing: The literature review as scientific inquiry. In American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 5 ed. Vol. 37. 1983. p. 313-319
Ottenbacher, Kenneth. / Quantitative reviewing : The literature review as scientific inquiry. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. Vol. 37 5. ed. 1983. pp. 313-319
@inbook{ef6037cac3064980a062ced7ae5d0fa3,
title = "Quantitative reviewing: The literature review as scientific inquiry",
abstract = "The literature review process is conceptualized as a form of scientific inquiry that involves methodological requirements and inferences similar to those employed in primary research. Five stages of quantitative reviewing that parallel stages in primary investigation are identified and briefly described. They include problem formation, data collection, data evaluation, analysis and interpretation, and reporting the results. The first two stages provide information and guidelines relevant to reviewers' employing traditional narrative procedures or conducting reviews of qualitative research literature. The final three stages relate specifically to the methodology of quantitative reviewing. The argument is made that quantitative reviewing procedures represent a paradigm shift that can assist researchers and clinicians in occupational therapy to establish a scientific data base that will serve to guide theory development and validate clinical practice.",
author = "Kenneth Ottenbacher",
year = "1983",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "313--319",
booktitle = "American Journal of Occupational Therapy",
edition = "5",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Quantitative reviewing

T2 - The literature review as scientific inquiry

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - The literature review process is conceptualized as a form of scientific inquiry that involves methodological requirements and inferences similar to those employed in primary research. Five stages of quantitative reviewing that parallel stages in primary investigation are identified and briefly described. They include problem formation, data collection, data evaluation, analysis and interpretation, and reporting the results. The first two stages provide information and guidelines relevant to reviewers' employing traditional narrative procedures or conducting reviews of qualitative research literature. The final three stages relate specifically to the methodology of quantitative reviewing. The argument is made that quantitative reviewing procedures represent a paradigm shift that can assist researchers and clinicians in occupational therapy to establish a scientific data base that will serve to guide theory development and validate clinical practice.

AB - The literature review process is conceptualized as a form of scientific inquiry that involves methodological requirements and inferences similar to those employed in primary research. Five stages of quantitative reviewing that parallel stages in primary investigation are identified and briefly described. They include problem formation, data collection, data evaluation, analysis and interpretation, and reporting the results. The first two stages provide information and guidelines relevant to reviewers' employing traditional narrative procedures or conducting reviews of qualitative research literature. The final three stages relate specifically to the methodology of quantitative reviewing. The argument is made that quantitative reviewing procedures represent a paradigm shift that can assist researchers and clinicians in occupational therapy to establish a scientific data base that will serve to guide theory development and validate clinical practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020503647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020503647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

C2 - 6869492

AN - SCOPUS:0020503647

VL - 37

SP - 313

EP - 319

BT - American Journal of Occupational Therapy

ER -