TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized Trials of Retosiban Versus Placebo or Atosiban in Spontaneous Preterm Labor
AU - Saade, George R.
AU - Shennan, Andrew
AU - Beach, Kathleen J.
AU - Hadar, Eran
AU - Parilla, Barbara V.
AU - Snidow, Jerry
AU - Powell, Marcy
AU - Montague, Timothy H.
AU - Liu, Feng
AU - Komatsu, Yosuke
AU - McKain, Laura
AU - Thornton, Steven
N1 - Funding Information:
Theauthorswouldliketothankthestaffatthestudysitesfor their time and contributions to these studies. They would like to especially acknowledge Professor Michael O’Shea, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC (in the past 3 years, who has received honoraria from the University of Miami, Duke University, and East Carolina University for visiting professorships; compensation from the American Board of Pediatrics for assistance with developing competency assessment tools for physicians; compensation from the National Institutes of Health for assistance with grant review and from the University of San Francisco for contributions to a research study on erythropoietin to reduce brain damage in full term infants with neonatal encephalopathy; research funding from the National Institutes of Health) and Professor Ricki Goldstein, University of Kentucky/Kentucky Children’s Hospital, Lexington, KY (no relevant conflicts of interest to declare) for their expertise in neonatology and contributions to the design of the trials. We also acknowledge contributors from the retosiban advisory board, including Dr Steve N. Caritis, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (no relevant conflicts of interest to declare); Professor Gian Carlo Di Renzo, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy (advisor to Ferring Pharmaceuticals); Dr Hugh Miller, Watching Over Mothers and Babies Foundation, AZ (has received research funding from GSK and participated in advisorypanelsforGSK);DrLuisSanchez-Ramos,University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL (no relevant conflicts of interest to declare); Dr Luis Cabero Roura, Hospital Valle Hebron de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (no relevant conflicts of interest to declare); Dr Guillermo Valenzuela, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, CA (also member of the steering committee; no relevant conflicts of interest to declare); and Dr Michael Varner, University of Utah, UT (principal investigator on clinical studies for Novavax and Mellitus, LLC; and has received speaker’s fees from Rush University Medical Center, IL and research funding from the NIH); and the retosiban steering committee, including Dr Gerard HA Visser, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands (has acted as a consultant to GSK) and Dr John Van den Anker, Children’s National Health System, Washington, DC (no relevant conflicts of interest to declare). The trials were funded by GSK. GSK contributed to the design of the trials and were involved in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data and writing of this manuscript. Pharmaceutical Product Development (Wilmington, NC) was responsible for safety monitoring and pharmacovigilance, clinical site management, randomization, clinical supplies, data management, regulatory submissions, biostatistics and programming. Medical writing assistance was provided by Katie White, PhD, of Fishawack Indicia Ltd, UK, and was funded by GSK.
Funding Information:
This study received its funding from GlaxoSmithKline.
Funding Information:
G.S., E.H., and B.V.P. report no conflicts of interest. A.S. provides consultancy advice for commercial organizations. He is chief investigator on several trials funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR, UK) related to the prevention of early birth and improved neonatal outcomes. He has no conflict related to the subject matter of this paper. S.T. provides consultancy advice for commercial organizations such as GSK, Ferring, and Hologic. He is a Trustee of a charity that funds related research. He holds positions in the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and other organizations. M.P. and T.H.M. are employees and shareholders of GSK. K.J.B., J.S., F.L., and Y.K. were employees of GSK at the time of the study and are shareholders of GSK. L.M. was an employee of PPD at the time of the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Objective The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of retosiban in spontaneous preterm labor (sPTL). Study Design Two multicenter, randomized, and double-blind trials compared retosiban with placebo and retosiban with atosiban in women with a singleton pregnancy and intact membranes in sPTL at 24 to 33 6/7 weeks' gestation. Coprimary endpoints in the placebo-controlled trial were time to delivery (TTD) or treatment failure (whichever occurred first) and neonatal composite morbidity and mortality. The primary endpoint of the atosiban comparator trial was TTD. Results The trials were terminated early because of slow recruitment. The placebo-controlled trial enrolled 23 participants (February 2016-July 2017; 2.6% of target);the atosiban-comparator trial enrolled 97 (March 2015-August 2017; 29% of target). Baseline participant characteristics were similar between treatments. In the placebo-controlled trial, mean gestational ages at randomization were 30.8 (retosiban, n = 10) and 30.5 weeks (placebo, n = 13), and mean times to delivery/treatment failure were 18.9 days (retosiban) and 11.1 days (placebo). Two and four neonates in the retosiban and placebo groups, respectively, had ≥1 component of the neonatal composite endpoint. In the atosiban-comparator trial, mean gestational age at randomization was 31.5 weeks (for both retosiban, n = 47, and atosiban, n = 50), and adjusted mean TTDs were 32.51 days (retosiban) and 33.71 days (atosiban; p > 0.05). Adverse events were no more common with retosiban than placebo or atosiban. Conclusion Despite considerable efforts to conduct two adequate and well-controlled studies in patients with sPTL, both studies were unable to recruit effectively and consequently terminated prematurely. Key factors negatively affecting participation were patient and physician resistance to use of a placebo comparator, lack of investigator consensus on diagnostic criteria and acceptance of protocol procedures, and ethics committee decisions. Meaningful cooperation between pharmaceutical companies, regulatory authorities, and the obstetric community is essential for future development of drugs to treat sPTL.
AB - Objective The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of retosiban in spontaneous preterm labor (sPTL). Study Design Two multicenter, randomized, and double-blind trials compared retosiban with placebo and retosiban with atosiban in women with a singleton pregnancy and intact membranes in sPTL at 24 to 33 6/7 weeks' gestation. Coprimary endpoints in the placebo-controlled trial were time to delivery (TTD) or treatment failure (whichever occurred first) and neonatal composite morbidity and mortality. The primary endpoint of the atosiban comparator trial was TTD. Results The trials were terminated early because of slow recruitment. The placebo-controlled trial enrolled 23 participants (February 2016-July 2017; 2.6% of target);the atosiban-comparator trial enrolled 97 (March 2015-August 2017; 29% of target). Baseline participant characteristics were similar between treatments. In the placebo-controlled trial, mean gestational ages at randomization were 30.8 (retosiban, n = 10) and 30.5 weeks (placebo, n = 13), and mean times to delivery/treatment failure were 18.9 days (retosiban) and 11.1 days (placebo). Two and four neonates in the retosiban and placebo groups, respectively, had ≥1 component of the neonatal composite endpoint. In the atosiban-comparator trial, mean gestational age at randomization was 31.5 weeks (for both retosiban, n = 47, and atosiban, n = 50), and adjusted mean TTDs were 32.51 days (retosiban) and 33.71 days (atosiban; p > 0.05). Adverse events were no more common with retosiban than placebo or atosiban. Conclusion Despite considerable efforts to conduct two adequate and well-controlled studies in patients with sPTL, both studies were unable to recruit effectively and consequently terminated prematurely. Key factors negatively affecting participation were patient and physician resistance to use of a placebo comparator, lack of investigator consensus on diagnostic criteria and acceptance of protocol procedures, and ethics committee decisions. Meaningful cooperation between pharmaceutical companies, regulatory authorities, and the obstetric community is essential for future development of drugs to treat sPTL.
KW - atosiban
KW - efficacy
KW - oxytocin antagonist
KW - recruitment
KW - retosiban
KW - safety
KW - spontaneous preterm labor
KW - tocolysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113150604&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113150604&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0040-1710034
DO - 10.1055/s-0040-1710034
M3 - Article
C2 - 32380566
AN - SCOPUS:85113150604
SN - 0735-1631
VL - 38
SP - 309
EP - 317
JO - American Journal of Perinatology
JF - American Journal of Perinatology
ER -