Randomized Trials of Retosiban Versus Placebo or Atosiban in Spontaneous Preterm Labor

George R. Saade, Andrew Shennan, Kathleen J. Beach, Eran Hadar, Barbara V. Parilla, Jerry Snidow, Marcy Powell, Timothy H. Montague, Feng Liu, Yosuke Komatsu, Laura McKain, Steven Thornton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Objective  The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of retosiban in spontaneous preterm labor (sPTL). Study Design  Two multicenter, randomized, and double-blind trials compared retosiban with placebo and retosiban with atosiban in women with a singleton pregnancy and intact membranes in sPTL at 24 to 33 6/7 weeks' gestation. Coprimary endpoints in the placebo-controlled trial were time to delivery (TTD) or treatment failure (whichever occurred first) and neonatal composite morbidity and mortality. The primary endpoint of the atosiban comparator trial was TTD. Results  The trials were terminated early because of slow recruitment. The placebo-controlled trial enrolled 23 participants (February 2016-July 2017; 2.6% of target);the atosiban-comparator trial enrolled 97 (March 2015-August 2017; 29% of target). Baseline participant characteristics were similar between treatments. In the placebo-controlled trial, mean gestational ages at randomization were 30.8 (retosiban, n = 10) and 30.5 weeks (placebo, n = 13), and mean times to delivery/treatment failure were 18.9 days (retosiban) and 11.1 days (placebo). Two and four neonates in the retosiban and placebo groups, respectively, had ≥1 component of the neonatal composite endpoint. In the atosiban-comparator trial, mean gestational age at randomization was 31.5 weeks (for both retosiban, n = 47, and atosiban, n = 50), and adjusted mean TTDs were 32.51 days (retosiban) and 33.71 days (atosiban; p > 0.05). Adverse events were no more common with retosiban than placebo or atosiban. Conclusion  Despite considerable efforts to conduct two adequate and well-controlled studies in patients with sPTL, both studies were unable to recruit effectively and consequently terminated prematurely. Key factors negatively affecting participation were patient and physician resistance to use of a placebo comparator, lack of investigator consensus on diagnostic criteria and acceptance of protocol procedures, and ethics committee decisions. Meaningful cooperation between pharmaceutical companies, regulatory authorities, and the obstetric community is essential for future development of drugs to treat sPTL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-317
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
StatePublished - Aug 1 2021
Externally publishedYes


  • atosiban
  • efficacy
  • oxytocin antagonist
  • recruitment
  • retosiban
  • safety
  • spontaneous preterm labor
  • tocolysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized Trials of Retosiban Versus Placebo or Atosiban in Spontaneous Preterm Labor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this