Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in patients with predicted difficult anatomy

Hesham Elsharkawy, Ankit Maheshwari, Rovnat Babazade, Anahi Perlas, Sherif Zaky, Loran Mounir-Soliman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited reports of lumbar neuraxial blocks using real-time US in patients with predicted difficulties. We compared the number of attempts to perform spinal anesthesia using real-time US guidance versus landmark technique in patients meeting predefined criteria for difficult spinal anesthesia. We also compared procedure time, block success, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores between groups. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval patients scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplasty with expected difficulty to perform spinal anesthesia were included. Number of attempts, block time, success rate, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores were recorded and we conducted the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test of difference between the groups. RESULTS : Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and a total of 32 data sets was analyzed. For number of attempts, we observed no difference between the groups (P<0.83). The US group resulted in marginally higher time to block compared to the control (P<0.0653). The US group resulted in marginally higher satisfaction compared to the control group (P<0.09). The block success rate was 100% in both groups. Anesthesiologists rated the US group procedure more difficult than the control group (χ2=10.85, P<0.0010). CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests that real-time US guidance for spinal anesthesia in challenging patients in comparison to the controlled group was completed in longer time, with lower needle insertion attempts, and higher patient satisfaction scores but without statistically significant differences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)465-473
Number of pages9
JournalMinerva Anestesiologica
Volume83
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Spinal Anesthesia
Anatomy
Patient Satisfaction
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Control Groups
Research Ethics Committees
Needles
Hip

Keywords

  • Autonomic nerve block
  • Color Doppler ultrasonography
  • Spinal anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in patients with predicted difficult anatomy. / Elsharkawy, Hesham; Maheshwari, Ankit; Babazade, Rovnat; Perlas, Anahi; Zaky, Sherif; Mounir-Soliman, Loran.

In: Minerva Anestesiologica, Vol. 83, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 465-473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Elsharkawy, Hesham ; Maheshwari, Ankit ; Babazade, Rovnat ; Perlas, Anahi ; Zaky, Sherif ; Mounir-Soliman, Loran. / Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in patients with predicted difficult anatomy. In: Minerva Anestesiologica. 2017 ; Vol. 83, No. 5. pp. 465-473.
@article{279a929fd98840e9a2d8fbbcc3a5fedc,
title = "Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in patients with predicted difficult anatomy",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: There are limited reports of lumbar neuraxial blocks using real-time US in patients with predicted difficulties. We compared the number of attempts to perform spinal anesthesia using real-time US guidance versus landmark technique in patients meeting predefined criteria for difficult spinal anesthesia. We also compared procedure time, block success, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores between groups. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval patients scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplasty with expected difficulty to perform spinal anesthesia were included. Number of attempts, block time, success rate, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores were recorded and we conducted the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test of difference between the groups. RESULTS : Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and a total of 32 data sets was analyzed. For number of attempts, we observed no difference between the groups (P<0.83). The US group resulted in marginally higher time to block compared to the control (P<0.0653). The US group resulted in marginally higher satisfaction compared to the control group (P<0.09). The block success rate was 100{\%} in both groups. Anesthesiologists rated the US group procedure more difficult than the control group (χ2=10.85, P<0.0010). CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests that real-time US guidance for spinal anesthesia in challenging patients in comparison to the controlled group was completed in longer time, with lower needle insertion attempts, and higher patient satisfaction scores but without statistically significant differences.",
keywords = "Autonomic nerve block, Color Doppler ultrasonography, Spinal anesthesia",
author = "Hesham Elsharkawy and Ankit Maheshwari and Rovnat Babazade and Anahi Perlas and Sherif Zaky and Loran Mounir-Soliman",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11610-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "465--473",
journal = "Minerva Anestesiologica",
issn = "0375-9393",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anesthesia in patients with predicted difficult anatomy

AU - Elsharkawy, Hesham

AU - Maheshwari, Ankit

AU - Babazade, Rovnat

AU - Perlas, Anahi

AU - Zaky, Sherif

AU - Mounir-Soliman, Loran

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: There are limited reports of lumbar neuraxial blocks using real-time US in patients with predicted difficulties. We compared the number of attempts to perform spinal anesthesia using real-time US guidance versus landmark technique in patients meeting predefined criteria for difficult spinal anesthesia. We also compared procedure time, block success, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores between groups. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval patients scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplasty with expected difficulty to perform spinal anesthesia were included. Number of attempts, block time, success rate, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores were recorded and we conducted the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test of difference between the groups. RESULTS : Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and a total of 32 data sets was analyzed. For number of attempts, we observed no difference between the groups (P<0.83). The US group resulted in marginally higher time to block compared to the control (P<0.0653). The US group resulted in marginally higher satisfaction compared to the control group (P<0.09). The block success rate was 100% in both groups. Anesthesiologists rated the US group procedure more difficult than the control group (χ2=10.85, P<0.0010). CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests that real-time US guidance for spinal anesthesia in challenging patients in comparison to the controlled group was completed in longer time, with lower needle insertion attempts, and higher patient satisfaction scores but without statistically significant differences.

AB - BACKGROUND: There are limited reports of lumbar neuraxial blocks using real-time US in patients with predicted difficulties. We compared the number of attempts to perform spinal anesthesia using real-time US guidance versus landmark technique in patients meeting predefined criteria for difficult spinal anesthesia. We also compared procedure time, block success, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores between groups. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval patients scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplasty with expected difficulty to perform spinal anesthesia were included. Number of attempts, block time, success rate, patient satisfaction and difficulty scores were recorded and we conducted the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test of difference between the groups. RESULTS : Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and a total of 32 data sets was analyzed. For number of attempts, we observed no difference between the groups (P<0.83). The US group resulted in marginally higher time to block compared to the control (P<0.0653). The US group resulted in marginally higher satisfaction compared to the control group (P<0.09). The block success rate was 100% in both groups. Anesthesiologists rated the US group procedure more difficult than the control group (χ2=10.85, P<0.0010). CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests that real-time US guidance for spinal anesthesia in challenging patients in comparison to the controlled group was completed in longer time, with lower needle insertion attempts, and higher patient satisfaction scores but without statistically significant differences.

KW - Autonomic nerve block

KW - Color Doppler ultrasonography

KW - Spinal anesthesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018965088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018965088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11610-4

DO - 10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11610-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 28094482

AN - SCOPUS:85018965088

VL - 83

SP - 465

EP - 473

JO - Minerva Anestesiologica

JF - Minerva Anestesiologica

SN - 0375-9393

IS - 5

ER -