Reassessing the Management of Treatment-Induced Brain Necrosis in Metastatic Patients: Advancing Surgical Alternatives to Steroid Therapy

  • Joshua D. Bernstock
  • , Nicholas B. Dadario
  • , Pablo A. Valdés
  • , Jakob V.E. Gerstl
  • , Benjamin R. Johnston
  • , Lennard Spanehl
  • , Florian A. Gessler
  • , Pierpaolo Peruzzi
  • , Timothy R. Smith
  • , Gregory K. Friedman
  • , Wenya Linda Bi
  • , E. A. Chiocca
  • , Ayal Aizer
  • , Omar Arnaout

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The emergence of modern adjuvant therapies has significantly improved outcomes for patients with brain metastases. However, treatment-related side effects present an ongoing challenge, particularly, treatment-induced necrosis characterized by perilesional edema and inflammation. Standard management with steroids compromises the efficacy of otherwise efficacious immunotherapeutic approaches. This position paper critiques traditional management strategies that rely heavily on systemic corticosteroid therapy—often ineffective in providing lasting relief and associated with serious side effects—and proposes a paradigm shift that prioritizes surgical resection. Resection facilitates prompt edema reduction with a low recurrence rate of symptoms and mitigates the adverse effects of prolonged corticosteroid use. We propose increased consideration for resecting symptomatic radiation necrosis to facilitate improved efficacy of immunotherapies in patients with brain metastases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere000185
JournalNeurosurgery Practice
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 28 2025

Keywords

  • Brain metastasis
  • Metastasis
  • Neurosurgery
  • Treatment necrosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reassessing the Management of Treatment-Induced Brain Necrosis in Metastatic Patients: Advancing Surgical Alternatives to Steroid Therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this