Reconstruction of the burned palm: Full-thickness versus split-thickness skin grafts—long-term follow-up

Jay M. Pensler, Robert Steward, Stephen R. Lewis, David N. Herndon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

The long-term results of full-thickness (N = 11) and split-thickness (N = 14) skin grafts for reconstitution of the palmar surface following release of palmar burn scar contractures in pediatric patients are compared. Patients treated with full-thickness skin grafts required 1.2 ± 0.4 operations (mean ± SD). Patients treated with split-thickness skin grafts required 1.3 ± 0.6 operations (mean ± SD). No significant difference in the number of operative procedures was noted. No functional difference existed between the two groups. The use of split-thickness skin grafts provided comparable function without increased operative procedures and was less deforming. Increased use of split-thickness skin grafts following release of palmar burn scar contractures in pediatric patients should be considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-49
Number of pages4
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume81
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reconstruction of the burned palm: Full-thickness versus split-thickness skin grafts—long-term follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this