Regional variation in stroke rehabilitation outcomes

Timothy A. Reistetter, Amol M. Karmarkar, James E. Graham, Karl Eschbach, Yong Fang Kuo, Carl V. Granger, Jean Freeman, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    31 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Objective: To examine and describe regional variation in outcomes for persons with stroke receiving inpatient medical rehabilitation. Design Retrospective cohort design. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation units and facilities contributing to the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation from the United States. Participants: Patients (N=143,036) with stroke discharged from inpatient rehabilitation during 2006 and 2007. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Community discharge, length of stay (LOS), and discharge functional status ratings (motor, cognitive) across 10 geographic service regions defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Results: Approximately 71% of the sample was discharged to the community. After adjusting for covariates, the percentage discharged to the community varied from 79.1% in the Southwest (CMS region 9) to 59.4% in the Northeast (CMS region 2). Adjusted LOS varied by 2.1 days, with CMS region 1 having the longest LOS at 18.3 days and CMS regions 5 and 9 having the shortest at 16.2 days. Conclusions: Rehabilitation outcomes for persons with stroke varied across CMS regions. Substantial variation in discharge destination and LOS remained after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)29-38
    Number of pages10
    JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Volume95
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 2014

    Keywords

    • Health services
    • Quality of health care
    • Rehabilitation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
    • Rehabilitation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Regional variation in stroke rehabilitation outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this