Regulations regarding reflexive testing and narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine.

D. H. MacMillan, B. L. Soderberg, Michael Laposata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of reflexive test selection and patient-specific narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine is associated with a host of compliance issues and government regulations. Reflexive testing is associated with many advantages for patients and their physicians, but if not adequately organized it has the potential for inefficient test ordering and abuse by physicians and laboratories. Patient-specific narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine, much more than fixed comments generated by a computer with a specific test result, also provide clinical and financial benefit when done effectively. Regulations exist to ensure that the physician-provided information has clinical value. This report describes the compliance and billing regulations regarding reflex testing and narrative interpretations. The codes used for narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine are also presented, as well as the use of those codes to obtain payment for the interpretation provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology
Volume116 Suppl
StatePublished - Dec 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicine
Physicians
Compliance
Government Regulation
Patient Selection
Reflex

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Regulations regarding reflexive testing and narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine. / MacMillan, D. H.; Soderberg, B. L.; Laposata, Michael.

In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 116 Suppl, 12.2001.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f4b5da24e6fc4daa8c405de91a2541b5,
title = "Regulations regarding reflexive testing and narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine.",
abstract = "The use of reflexive test selection and patient-specific narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine is associated with a host of compliance issues and government regulations. Reflexive testing is associated with many advantages for patients and their physicians, but if not adequately organized it has the potential for inefficient test ordering and abuse by physicians and laboratories. Patient-specific narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine, much more than fixed comments generated by a computer with a specific test result, also provide clinical and financial benefit when done effectively. Regulations exist to ensure that the physician-provided information has clinical value. This report describes the compliance and billing regulations regarding reflex testing and narrative interpretations. The codes used for narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine are also presented, as well as the use of those codes to obtain payment for the interpretation provided.",
author = "MacMillan, {D. H.} and Soderberg, {B. L.} and Michael Laposata",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116 Suppl",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0002-9173",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Pathologists",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulations regarding reflexive testing and narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine.

AU - MacMillan, D. H.

AU - Soderberg, B. L.

AU - Laposata, Michael

PY - 2001/12

Y1 - 2001/12

N2 - The use of reflexive test selection and patient-specific narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine is associated with a host of compliance issues and government regulations. Reflexive testing is associated with many advantages for patients and their physicians, but if not adequately organized it has the potential for inefficient test ordering and abuse by physicians and laboratories. Patient-specific narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine, much more than fixed comments generated by a computer with a specific test result, also provide clinical and financial benefit when done effectively. Regulations exist to ensure that the physician-provided information has clinical value. This report describes the compliance and billing regulations regarding reflex testing and narrative interpretations. The codes used for narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine are also presented, as well as the use of those codes to obtain payment for the interpretation provided.

AB - The use of reflexive test selection and patient-specific narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine is associated with a host of compliance issues and government regulations. Reflexive testing is associated with many advantages for patients and their physicians, but if not adequately organized it has the potential for inefficient test ordering and abuse by physicians and laboratories. Patient-specific narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine, much more than fixed comments generated by a computer with a specific test result, also provide clinical and financial benefit when done effectively. Regulations exist to ensure that the physician-provided information has clinical value. This report describes the compliance and billing regulations regarding reflex testing and narrative interpretations. The codes used for narrative interpretations in laboratory medicine are also presented, as well as the use of those codes to obtain payment for the interpretation provided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035754280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035754280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11993698

AN - SCOPUS:0035754280

VL - 116 Suppl

JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

SN - 0002-9173

ER -