Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building research capacity

Walter R. Frontera; Marcus J. Fuhrer; Alan M. Jette; Leighton Chan; Rory A. Cooper; Pamela W. Duncan; John D. Kemp; Kenneth J. Ottenbacher; P. Hunter Peckham; Elliot J. Roth; Denise G. Tate

doi:10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building research capacity

Walter R. Frontera, Marcus J. Fuhrer, Alan M. Jette, Leighton Chan, Rory A. Cooper, Pamela W. Duncan, John D. Kemp, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, P. Hunter Peckham, Elliot J. Roth, Denise G. Tate

Rehabilitation Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	68-80
Number of pages	13
Journal	Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Volume	12
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8
State	Published - Sep 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Rehabilitation
Community and Home Care
Clinical Neurology

Access to Document

10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8

Cite this

@article{862c8a3dae75437094ffa800ce211889,

title = "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building research capacity",

abstract = "The general objective of the {"}Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity{"} was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.",

author = "Frontera, {Walter R.} and Fuhrer, {Marcus J.} and Jette, {Alan M.} and Leighton Chan and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Duncan, {Pamela W.} and Kemp, {John D.} and Ottenbacher, {Kenneth J.} and Peckham, {P. Hunter} and Roth, {Elliot J.} and Tate, {Denise G.}",

year = "2005",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "12",

pages = "68--80",

journal = "Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation",

issn = "1074-9357",

publisher = "Thomas Land Publishers Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation Medicine Summit

T2 - Building research capacity

AU - Frontera, Walter R.

AU - Fuhrer, Marcus J.

AU - Jette, Alan M.

AU - Chan, Leighton

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Duncan, Pamela W.

AU - Kemp, John D.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.

AU - Peckham, P. Hunter

AU - Roth, Elliot J.

AU - Tate, Denise G.

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

AB - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31144449984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31144449984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8

DO - 10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8

M3 - Article

C2 - 16698738

AN - SCOPUS:31144449984

SN - 1074-9357

VL - 12

SP - 68

EP - 80

JO - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

JF - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

IS - 4

ER -

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building research capacity

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this