Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building research capacity

Walter R. Frontera, Marcus J. Fuhrer, Alan M. Jette, Leighton Chan, Rory A. Cooper, Pamela W. Duncan, John D. Kemp, Kenneth Ottenbacher, P. Hunter Peckham, Elliot J. Roth, Denise G. Tate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-80
Number of pages13
JournalTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Fingerprint

Capacity Building
Rehabilitation
Medicine
Research
Research Personnel
Private Sector
Biomedical Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Frontera, W. R., Fuhrer, M. J., Jette, A. M., Chan, L., Cooper, R. A., Duncan, P. W., ... Tate, D. G. (2005). Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building research capacity. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 12(4), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit : Building research capacity. / Frontera, Walter R.; Fuhrer, Marcus J.; Jette, Alan M.; Chan, Leighton; Cooper, Rory A.; Duncan, Pamela W.; Kemp, John D.; Ottenbacher, Kenneth; Peckham, P. Hunter; Roth, Elliot J.; Tate, Denise G.

In: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, Vol. 12, No. 4, 09.2005, p. 68-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frontera, WR, Fuhrer, MJ, Jette, AM, Chan, L, Cooper, RA, Duncan, PW, Kemp, JD, Ottenbacher, K, Peckham, PH, Roth, EJ & Tate, DG 2005, 'Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building research capacity', Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 68-80. https://doi.org/10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8
Frontera WR, Fuhrer MJ, Jette AM, Chan L, Cooper RA, Duncan PW et al. Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building research capacity. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2005 Sep;12(4):68-80. https://doi.org/10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8
Frontera, Walter R. ; Fuhrer, Marcus J. ; Jette, Alan M. ; Chan, Leighton ; Cooper, Rory A. ; Duncan, Pamela W. ; Kemp, John D. ; Ottenbacher, Kenneth ; Peckham, P. Hunter ; Roth, Elliot J. ; Tate, Denise G. / Rehabilitation Medicine Summit : Building research capacity. In: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2005 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 68-80.
@article{862c8a3dae75437094ffa800ce211889,
title = "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building research capacity",
abstract = "The general objective of the {"}Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity{"} was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.",
author = "Frontera, {Walter R.} and Fuhrer, {Marcus J.} and Jette, {Alan M.} and Leighton Chan and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Duncan, {Pamela W.} and Kemp, {John D.} and Kenneth Ottenbacher and Peckham, {P. Hunter} and Roth, {Elliot J.} and Tate, {Denise G.}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "68--80",
journal = "Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation",
issn = "1074-9357",
publisher = "Thomas Land Publishers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation Medicine Summit

T2 - Building research capacity

AU - Frontera, Walter R.

AU - Fuhrer, Marcus J.

AU - Jette, Alan M.

AU - Chan, Leighton

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Duncan, Pamela W.

AU - Kemp, John D.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Peckham, P. Hunter

AU - Roth, Elliot J.

AU - Tate, Denise G.

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

AB - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31144449984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31144449984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8

DO - 10.1310/6WYU-95XG-4G8Q-5XA8

M3 - Article

C2 - 16698738

AN - SCOPUS:31144449984

VL - 12

SP - 68

EP - 80

JO - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

JF - Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

SN - 1074-9357

IS - 4

ER -