Rehabilitation medicine summit

Building research capacity

Walter R. Frontera, Marcus J. Fuhrer, Alan M. Jette, Leighton Chan, Rory A. Cooper, Pamela W. Duncan, John D. Kemp, Kenneth Ottenbacher, P. Hunter Peckham, Elliot J. Roth, Denise G. Tate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)913-917
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume84
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Capacity Building
Rehabilitation
Medicine
Research
Research Personnel
Private Sector
Biomedical Research

Keywords

  • Capacity
  • Outcomes
  • Rehabilitation
  • Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Frontera, W. R., Fuhrer, M. J., Jette, A. M., Chan, L., Cooper, R. A., Duncan, P. W., ... Tate, D. G. (2005). Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(12), 913-917. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000190316.61035.5e

Rehabilitation medicine summit : Building research capacity. / Frontera, Walter R.; Fuhrer, Marcus J.; Jette, Alan M.; Chan, Leighton; Cooper, Rory A.; Duncan, Pamela W.; Kemp, John D.; Ottenbacher, Kenneth; Hunter Peckham, P.; Roth, Elliot J.; Tate, Denise G.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 84, No. 12, 12.2005, p. 913-917.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frontera, WR, Fuhrer, MJ, Jette, AM, Chan, L, Cooper, RA, Duncan, PW, Kemp, JD, Ottenbacher, K, Hunter Peckham, P, Roth, EJ & Tate, DG 2005, 'Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity', American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 913-917. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000190316.61035.5e
Frontera, Walter R. ; Fuhrer, Marcus J. ; Jette, Alan M. ; Chan, Leighton ; Cooper, Rory A. ; Duncan, Pamela W. ; Kemp, John D. ; Ottenbacher, Kenneth ; Hunter Peckham, P. ; Roth, Elliot J. ; Tate, Denise G. / Rehabilitation medicine summit : Building research capacity. In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005 ; Vol. 84, No. 12. pp. 913-917.
@article{391b26f4e340405aaeef22d4e57da6a9,
title = "Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity",
abstract = "The general objective of the {"}Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity{"} was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.",
keywords = "Capacity, Outcomes, Rehabilitation, Research",
author = "Frontera, {Walter R.} and Fuhrer, {Marcus J.} and Jette, {Alan M.} and Leighton Chan and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Duncan, {Pamela W.} and Kemp, {John D.} and Kenneth Ottenbacher and {Hunter Peckham}, P. and Roth, {Elliot J.} and Tate, {Denise G.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/01.phm.0000190316.61035.5e",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "913--917",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation medicine summit

T2 - Building research capacity

AU - Frontera, Walter R.

AU - Fuhrer, Marcus J.

AU - Jette, Alan M.

AU - Chan, Leighton

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Duncan, Pamela W.

AU - Kemp, John D.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Hunter Peckham, P.

AU - Roth, Elliot J.

AU - Tate, Denise G.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

AB - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: 1) researchers; 2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; 3) funding; 4) partnerships; and 5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

KW - Capacity

KW - Outcomes

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29244460075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29244460075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.phm.0000190316.61035.5e

DO - 10.1097/01.phm.0000190316.61035.5e

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 913

EP - 917

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 12

ER -