Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity (executive summary)

Walter R. Frontera, Marcus J. Fuhrer, Alan M. Jette, Leighton Chan, Rory A. Cooper, Pamela W. Duncan, John D. Kemp, Kenneth Ottenbacher, P. Hunter Peckham, Elliot J. Roth, Denise G. Tate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (a) researchers; (b) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (c) funding; (d) partnerships; and (e) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A postsummit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-14
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Capacity Building
rehabilitation
Rehabilitation
Medicine
medicine
Research
Research Personnel
medical rehabilitation
funding
Private Sector
Biomedical Research
professional association
group discussion
small group
private sector
infrastructure
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Frontera, W. R., Fuhrer, M. J., Jette, A. M., Chan, L., Cooper, R. A., Duncan, P. W., ... Tate, D. G. (2006). Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity (executive summary). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2006/002)

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit : Building Research Capacity (executive summary). / Frontera, Walter R.; Fuhrer, Marcus J.; Jette, Alan M.; Chan, Leighton; Cooper, Rory A.; Duncan, Pamela W.; Kemp, John D.; Ottenbacher, Kenneth; Peckham, P. Hunter; Roth, Elliot J.; Tate, Denise G.

In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 3-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frontera, WR, Fuhrer, MJ, Jette, AM, Chan, L, Cooper, RA, Duncan, PW, Kemp, JD, Ottenbacher, K, Peckham, PH, Roth, EJ & Tate, DG 2006, 'Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity (executive summary)', American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2006/002)
Frontera, Walter R. ; Fuhrer, Marcus J. ; Jette, Alan M. ; Chan, Leighton ; Cooper, Rory A. ; Duncan, Pamela W. ; Kemp, John D. ; Ottenbacher, Kenneth ; Peckham, P. Hunter ; Roth, Elliot J. ; Tate, Denise G. / Rehabilitation Medicine Summit : Building Research Capacity (executive summary). In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 3-14.
@article{3297204812c3423a926b87dd2fb25e53,
title = "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity (executive summary)",
abstract = "The general objective of the {"}Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity{"} was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (a) researchers; (b) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (c) funding; (d) partnerships; and (e) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A postsummit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.",
author = "Frontera, {Walter R.} and Fuhrer, {Marcus J.} and Jette, {Alan M.} and Leighton Chan and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Duncan, {Pamela W.} and Kemp, {John D.} and Kenneth Ottenbacher and Peckham, {P. Hunter} and Roth, {Elliot J.} and Tate, {Denise G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1044/1058-0360(2006/002)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "3--14",
journal = "American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1058-0360",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation Medicine Summit

T2 - Building Research Capacity (executive summary)

AU - Frontera, Walter R.

AU - Fuhrer, Marcus J.

AU - Jette, Alan M.

AU - Chan, Leighton

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Duncan, Pamela W.

AU - Kemp, John D.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Peckham, P. Hunter

AU - Roth, Elliot J.

AU - Tate, Denise G.

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (a) researchers; (b) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (c) funding; (d) partnerships; and (e) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A postsummit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

AB - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (a) researchers; (b) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (c) funding; (d) partnerships; and (e) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A postsummit, multiorganizational initiative is called for to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645983224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645983224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/002)

DO - 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/002)

M3 - Article

C2 - 16533088

AN - SCOPUS:33645983224

VL - 15

SP - 3

EP - 14

JO - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

JF - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1058-0360

IS - 1

ER -