Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity executive summary

Walter R. Frontera, Marcus J. Fuhrer, Alan M. Jette, Leighton Chan, Rory A. Cooper, Pamela W. Duncan, John D. Kemp, Kenneth Ottenbacher, P. Hunter Peckham, Elliot J. Roth, Denise G. Tate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-38
Number of pages6
JournalOTJR Occupation, Participation and Health
Volume26
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Capacity Building
Rehabilitation
Medicine
Research
Research Personnel
Private Sector
Biomedical Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Frontera, W. R., Fuhrer, M. J., Jette, A. M., Chan, L., Cooper, R. A., Duncan, P. W., ... Tate, D. G. (2006). Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity executive summary. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 26(1), 33-38.

Rehabilitation Medicine Summit : Building Research Capacity executive summary. / Frontera, Walter R.; Fuhrer, Marcus J.; Jette, Alan M.; Chan, Leighton; Cooper, Rory A.; Duncan, Pamela W.; Kemp, John D.; Ottenbacher, Kenneth; Peckham, P. Hunter; Roth, Elliot J.; Tate, Denise G.

In: OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2006, p. 33-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frontera, WR, Fuhrer, MJ, Jette, AM, Chan, L, Cooper, RA, Duncan, PW, Kemp, JD, Ottenbacher, K, Peckham, PH, Roth, EJ & Tate, DG 2006, 'Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity executive summary', OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 33-38.
Frontera WR, Fuhrer MJ, Jette AM, Chan L, Cooper RA, Duncan PW et al. Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity executive summary. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health. 2006;26(1):33-38.
Frontera, Walter R. ; Fuhrer, Marcus J. ; Jette, Alan M. ; Chan, Leighton ; Cooper, Rory A. ; Duncan, Pamela W. ; Kemp, John D. ; Ottenbacher, Kenneth ; Peckham, P. Hunter ; Roth, Elliot J. ; Tate, Denise G. / Rehabilitation Medicine Summit : Building Research Capacity executive summary. In: OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health. 2006 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 33-38.
@article{aa4cde8164fe40ae82cadc4aee326315,
title = "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity executive summary",
abstract = "The general objective of the {"}Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity{"} was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.",
author = "Frontera, {Walter R.} and Fuhrer, {Marcus J.} and Jette, {Alan M.} and Leighton Chan and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Duncan, {Pamela W.} and Kemp, {John D.} and Kenneth Ottenbacher and Peckham, {P. Hunter} and Roth, {Elliot J.} and Tate, {Denise G.}",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "33--38",
journal = "OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health",
issn = "1539-4492",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation Medicine Summit

T2 - Building Research Capacity executive summary

AU - Frontera, Walter R.

AU - Fuhrer, Marcus J.

AU - Jette, Alan M.

AU - Chan, Leighton

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Duncan, Pamela W.

AU - Kemp, John D.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Peckham, P. Hunter

AU - Roth, Elliot J.

AU - Tate, Denise G.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

AB - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The five elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41949111229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41949111229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:41949111229

VL - 26

SP - 33

EP - 38

JO - OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health

JF - OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health

SN - 1539-4492

IS - 1

ER -