Resident education and management of end-of-life care

The resident's perspective

Zara Cooper, Michael Meyers, Nancy L. Keating, Xiangmei Gu, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Selwyn O. Rogers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Twenty percent of Americans die in the intensive care unit of our nation's hospitals. Many of those individuals die after life-sustaining therapy has been withdrawn or withheld. Surgeons should be competent in discussing the withholding and withdrawal of life sustaining therapy (WWLST) with their patients. We surveyed surgical residents to learn their perspectives and training experience with discussing end-of-life care and WWLST with patients. Methods: We mailed a survey to residents in all accredited surgical residency programs in New England. Nonresponders were contacted by mail at 3 and 6 weeks after the initial mailing. Results: Nineteen of 20 (95%) programs participated in this study. Three hundred thirty-five residents were surveyed and 141 residents responded (response rate, 42%). Ninety-two percent (n = 129) of respondents had cared for patients where WWLST had occurred, and 74% (n = 104) had initiated a discussion about WWLST themselves. Most (n = 81, 60%) respondents felt competent to discuss WWLST, whereas 14% rarely (n = 13) or never (n = 6) felt comfortable discussing WWLST. Most (n = 119, 85%) respondents believed that they would be adequately trained at the end of their residencies; however, 39% (n = 53) felt they were inadequately trained in this area. Graduates before 2002 were significantly more likely to agree strongly or generally that they would be well trained in managing WWLST when they completed residency (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Almost all surgical residents will have to discuss WWLST with patients and their families, yet a significant number feel inadequately trained to do so. Steps should be taken to ensure that surgical residents can discuss WWLST as part of their core competencies, and this training should be reinforced throughout residency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-84
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume67
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
withdrawal
resident
Education
management
Internship and Residency
education
Therapeutics
New England
Postal Service
Intensive Care Units
graduate

Keywords

  • communication training
  • end-of-life care
  • resident survey
  • withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Cite this

Cooper, Z., Meyers, M., Keating, N. L., Gu, X., Lipsitz, S. R., & Rogers, S. O. (2010). Resident education and management of end-of-life care: The resident's perspective. Journal of Surgical Education, 67(2), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.01.002

Resident education and management of end-of-life care : The resident's perspective. / Cooper, Zara; Meyers, Michael; Keating, Nancy L.; Gu, Xiangmei; Lipsitz, Stuart R.; Rogers, Selwyn O.

In: Journal of Surgical Education, Vol. 67, No. 2, 03.2010, p. 79-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cooper, Z, Meyers, M, Keating, NL, Gu, X, Lipsitz, SR & Rogers, SO 2010, 'Resident education and management of end-of-life care: The resident's perspective', Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.01.002
Cooper, Zara ; Meyers, Michael ; Keating, Nancy L. ; Gu, Xiangmei ; Lipsitz, Stuart R. ; Rogers, Selwyn O. / Resident education and management of end-of-life care : The resident's perspective. In: Journal of Surgical Education. 2010 ; Vol. 67, No. 2. pp. 79-84.
@article{2adf078fdb3e494e98c3b49f1f8a8019,
title = "Resident education and management of end-of-life care: The resident's perspective",
abstract = "Background: Twenty percent of Americans die in the intensive care unit of our nation's hospitals. Many of those individuals die after life-sustaining therapy has been withdrawn or withheld. Surgeons should be competent in discussing the withholding and withdrawal of life sustaining therapy (WWLST) with their patients. We surveyed surgical residents to learn their perspectives and training experience with discussing end-of-life care and WWLST with patients. Methods: We mailed a survey to residents in all accredited surgical residency programs in New England. Nonresponders were contacted by mail at 3 and 6 weeks after the initial mailing. Results: Nineteen of 20 (95{\%}) programs participated in this study. Three hundred thirty-five residents were surveyed and 141 residents responded (response rate, 42{\%}). Ninety-two percent (n = 129) of respondents had cared for patients where WWLST had occurred, and 74{\%} (n = 104) had initiated a discussion about WWLST themselves. Most (n = 81, 60{\%}) respondents felt competent to discuss WWLST, whereas 14{\%} rarely (n = 13) or never (n = 6) felt comfortable discussing WWLST. Most (n = 119, 85{\%}) respondents believed that they would be adequately trained at the end of their residencies; however, 39{\%} (n = 53) felt they were inadequately trained in this area. Graduates before 2002 were significantly more likely to agree strongly or generally that they would be well trained in managing WWLST when they completed residency (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Almost all surgical residents will have to discuss WWLST with patients and their families, yet a significant number feel inadequately trained to do so. Steps should be taken to ensure that surgical residents can discuss WWLST as part of their core competencies, and this training should be reinforced throughout residency.",
keywords = "communication training, end-of-life care, resident survey, withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy",
author = "Zara Cooper and Michael Meyers and Keating, {Nancy L.} and Xiangmei Gu and Lipsitz, {Stuart R.} and Rogers, {Selwyn O.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.01.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "79--84",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resident education and management of end-of-life care

T2 - The resident's perspective

AU - Cooper, Zara

AU - Meyers, Michael

AU - Keating, Nancy L.

AU - Gu, Xiangmei

AU - Lipsitz, Stuart R.

AU - Rogers, Selwyn O.

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Background: Twenty percent of Americans die in the intensive care unit of our nation's hospitals. Many of those individuals die after life-sustaining therapy has been withdrawn or withheld. Surgeons should be competent in discussing the withholding and withdrawal of life sustaining therapy (WWLST) with their patients. We surveyed surgical residents to learn their perspectives and training experience with discussing end-of-life care and WWLST with patients. Methods: We mailed a survey to residents in all accredited surgical residency programs in New England. Nonresponders were contacted by mail at 3 and 6 weeks after the initial mailing. Results: Nineteen of 20 (95%) programs participated in this study. Three hundred thirty-five residents were surveyed and 141 residents responded (response rate, 42%). Ninety-two percent (n = 129) of respondents had cared for patients where WWLST had occurred, and 74% (n = 104) had initiated a discussion about WWLST themselves. Most (n = 81, 60%) respondents felt competent to discuss WWLST, whereas 14% rarely (n = 13) or never (n = 6) felt comfortable discussing WWLST. Most (n = 119, 85%) respondents believed that they would be adequately trained at the end of their residencies; however, 39% (n = 53) felt they were inadequately trained in this area. Graduates before 2002 were significantly more likely to agree strongly or generally that they would be well trained in managing WWLST when they completed residency (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Almost all surgical residents will have to discuss WWLST with patients and their families, yet a significant number feel inadequately trained to do so. Steps should be taken to ensure that surgical residents can discuss WWLST as part of their core competencies, and this training should be reinforced throughout residency.

AB - Background: Twenty percent of Americans die in the intensive care unit of our nation's hospitals. Many of those individuals die after life-sustaining therapy has been withdrawn or withheld. Surgeons should be competent in discussing the withholding and withdrawal of life sustaining therapy (WWLST) with their patients. We surveyed surgical residents to learn their perspectives and training experience with discussing end-of-life care and WWLST with patients. Methods: We mailed a survey to residents in all accredited surgical residency programs in New England. Nonresponders were contacted by mail at 3 and 6 weeks after the initial mailing. Results: Nineteen of 20 (95%) programs participated in this study. Three hundred thirty-five residents were surveyed and 141 residents responded (response rate, 42%). Ninety-two percent (n = 129) of respondents had cared for patients where WWLST had occurred, and 74% (n = 104) had initiated a discussion about WWLST themselves. Most (n = 81, 60%) respondents felt competent to discuss WWLST, whereas 14% rarely (n = 13) or never (n = 6) felt comfortable discussing WWLST. Most (n = 119, 85%) respondents believed that they would be adequately trained at the end of their residencies; however, 39% (n = 53) felt they were inadequately trained in this area. Graduates before 2002 were significantly more likely to agree strongly or generally that they would be well trained in managing WWLST when they completed residency (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Almost all surgical residents will have to discuss WWLST with patients and their families, yet a significant number feel inadequately trained to do so. Steps should be taken to ensure that surgical residents can discuss WWLST as part of their core competencies, and this training should be reinforced throughout residency.

KW - communication training

KW - end-of-life care

KW - resident survey

KW - withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956646419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956646419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.01.002

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 79

EP - 84

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

IS - 2

ER -