TY - JOUR
T1 - Respiratory System Mechanics during Low Versus High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Open Abdominal Surgery
T2 - A Substudy of PROVHILO Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - D'Antini, Davide
AU - Huhle, Robert
AU - Herrmann, Jacob
AU - Sulemanji, Demet S.
AU - Oto, Jun
AU - Raimondo, Pasquale
AU - Mirabella, Lucia
AU - Hemmes, Sabrine N.T.
AU - Schultz, Marcus J.
AU - Pelosi, Paolo
AU - Kaczka, David W.
AU - Vidal Melo, Marcos Francisco
AU - Abreu, Marcelo Gama De
AU - Cinnella, Gilda
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 International Anesthesia Research Society.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: In the 2014 PROtective Ventilation using HIgh versus LOw positive end-expiratory pressure (PROVHILO) trial, intraoperative low tidal volume ventilation with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP = 12 cm H2O) and lung recruitment maneuvers did not decrease postoperative pulmonary complications when compared to low PEEP (0-2 cm H2O) approach without recruitment breaths. However, effects of intraoperative PEEP on lung compliance remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that higher PEEP leads to a dominance of intratidal overdistension, whereas lower PEEP results in intratidal recruitment/derecruitment (R/D). To test our hypothesis, we used the volume-dependent elastance index %E2, a respiratory parameter that allows for noninvasive and radiation-free assessment of dominant overdistension and intratidal R/D. We compared the incidence of intratidal R/D, linear expansion, and overdistension by means of %E2 in a subset of the PROVHILO cohort. METHODS: In 36 patients from 2 participating centers of the PROVHILO trial, we calculated respiratory system elastance (E), resistance (R), and %E2, a surrogate parameter for intratidal overdistension (%E2 > 30%) and R/D (%E2 < 0%). To test the main hypothesis, we compared the incidence of intratidal overdistension (primary end point) and R/D in higher and lower PEEP groups, as measured by %E2. RESULTS: E was increased in the lower compared to higher PEEP group (18.6 [16.22] vs 13.4 [11.0.17.0] cm H2O·L-1; P <.01). %E2 was reduced in the lower PEEP group compared to higher PEEP (-15.4 [-28.0.6.5] vs 6.2 [-0.8.14.0] %; P <.05). Intratidal R/D was increased in the lower PEEP group (61% vs 22%; P =.037). The incidence of intratidal overdistension did not differ significantly between groups (6%). CONCLUSIONS: During mechanical ventilation with protective tidal volumes in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery, lung recruitment followed by PEEP of 12 cm H2O decreased the incidence of intratidal R/D and did not worsen overdistension, when compared to PEEP ≤2 cm H2O.
AB - BACKGROUND: In the 2014 PROtective Ventilation using HIgh versus LOw positive end-expiratory pressure (PROVHILO) trial, intraoperative low tidal volume ventilation with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP = 12 cm H2O) and lung recruitment maneuvers did not decrease postoperative pulmonary complications when compared to low PEEP (0-2 cm H2O) approach without recruitment breaths. However, effects of intraoperative PEEP on lung compliance remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that higher PEEP leads to a dominance of intratidal overdistension, whereas lower PEEP results in intratidal recruitment/derecruitment (R/D). To test our hypothesis, we used the volume-dependent elastance index %E2, a respiratory parameter that allows for noninvasive and radiation-free assessment of dominant overdistension and intratidal R/D. We compared the incidence of intratidal R/D, linear expansion, and overdistension by means of %E2 in a subset of the PROVHILO cohort. METHODS: In 36 patients from 2 participating centers of the PROVHILO trial, we calculated respiratory system elastance (E), resistance (R), and %E2, a surrogate parameter for intratidal overdistension (%E2 > 30%) and R/D (%E2 < 0%). To test the main hypothesis, we compared the incidence of intratidal overdistension (primary end point) and R/D in higher and lower PEEP groups, as measured by %E2. RESULTS: E was increased in the lower compared to higher PEEP group (18.6 [16.22] vs 13.4 [11.0.17.0] cm H2O·L-1; P <.01). %E2 was reduced in the lower PEEP group compared to higher PEEP (-15.4 [-28.0.6.5] vs 6.2 [-0.8.14.0] %; P <.05). Intratidal R/D was increased in the lower PEEP group (61% vs 22%; P =.037). The incidence of intratidal overdistension did not differ significantly between groups (6%). CONCLUSIONS: During mechanical ventilation with protective tidal volumes in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery, lung recruitment followed by PEEP of 12 cm H2O decreased the incidence of intratidal R/D and did not worsen overdistension, when compared to PEEP ≤2 cm H2O.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021080432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021080432&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002192
DO - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002192
M3 - Article
C2 - 28632529
AN - SCOPUS:85021080432
SN - 0003-2999
VL - 126
SP - 143
EP - 149
JO - Anesthesia and analgesia
JF - Anesthesia and analgesia
IS - 1
ER -