Results of a cross-sectional survey about lipid-management practices among cardiologists in Pakistan: Assessment of adherence to published treatment guidelines

Saqib A. Gowani, Sana Shoukat, Ather M. Taqui, Nizar Bhulani, Sameer Khalid, Amna Sheikh, Muhammad S. Halim, Sarah Samreen, Fahim H. Jafary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess how closely cardiologists in Pakistan followed published recommendations for lipid management and to identify the factors associated with such behavior. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was delivered in person between September and December 2007 to all cardiologists practicing in 4 major cities in Pakistan (Karachi, Lahore, Quetta, and Peshawar). A standard questionnaire was used to obtain information from cardiologists. Adherence to the guidelines established by the 2004 National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III was computed based on answers to 14 questions; each correct answer (ie, the answer that followed the guidelines) was assigned 1 point, for a maximum cumulative score of 14. Multivariable linear regression was performed to determine the factors independently associated with guideline knowledge. Results: A total of 295 cardiologists were approached; 239 consented to participate (overall response rate, 81.0%). The median score was 9 out of a maximum of 14 (interquartile range, 8-11). There were important points of divergence from practice recommendations, including suboptimal targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (≤70 mg/dL was the target used by only 16.7% of respondents [40/239]), undertreatment of revascularized patients (31.4% [75/239]), cessation of statin therapy once LDL-C targets were achieved (20.9% [50/239]), and use of different treatment thresholds for patients aged >65 years (41.8% [100/239]) and female patients (46.4% [111/239]). In the adjusted analysis, experienced physicians, interventional cardiologists, and those who pursued continuing medical education activities (journals and conferences) had higher scores (P = 0.005, P = 0.041, P = 0.008, and P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: We found important self-reported departures from recommended lipid-management guidelines among cardiologists in Pakistan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1604-1614
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Therapeutics
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Practice Management
Pakistan
Cross-Sectional Studies
Guidelines
Lipids
LDL Cholesterol
Therapeutics
Guideline Adherence
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
Continuing Medical Education
Cardiologists
Linear Models
Cholesterol
Physicians
Education

Keywords

  • cardiologist
  • developing country
  • lipids
  • Pakistan
  • practices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

Results of a cross-sectional survey about lipid-management practices among cardiologists in Pakistan : Assessment of adherence to published treatment guidelines. / Gowani, Saqib A.; Shoukat, Sana; Taqui, Ather M.; Bhulani, Nizar; Khalid, Sameer; Sheikh, Amna; Halim, Muhammad S.; Samreen, Sarah; Jafary, Fahim H.

In: Clinical Therapeutics, Vol. 31, No. 7, 01.07.2009, p. 1604-1614.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gowani, Saqib A. ; Shoukat, Sana ; Taqui, Ather M. ; Bhulani, Nizar ; Khalid, Sameer ; Sheikh, Amna ; Halim, Muhammad S. ; Samreen, Sarah ; Jafary, Fahim H. / Results of a cross-sectional survey about lipid-management practices among cardiologists in Pakistan : Assessment of adherence to published treatment guidelines. In: Clinical Therapeutics. 2009 ; Vol. 31, No. 7. pp. 1604-1614.
@article{e2d01a2f5018448a933e08c2e8307d0a,
title = "Results of a cross-sectional survey about lipid-management practices among cardiologists in Pakistan: Assessment of adherence to published treatment guidelines",
abstract = "Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess how closely cardiologists in Pakistan followed published recommendations for lipid management and to identify the factors associated with such behavior. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was delivered in person between September and December 2007 to all cardiologists practicing in 4 major cities in Pakistan (Karachi, Lahore, Quetta, and Peshawar). A standard questionnaire was used to obtain information from cardiologists. Adherence to the guidelines established by the 2004 National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III was computed based on answers to 14 questions; each correct answer (ie, the answer that followed the guidelines) was assigned 1 point, for a maximum cumulative score of 14. Multivariable linear regression was performed to determine the factors independently associated with guideline knowledge. Results: A total of 295 cardiologists were approached; 239 consented to participate (overall response rate, 81.0{\%}). The median score was 9 out of a maximum of 14 (interquartile range, 8-11). There were important points of divergence from practice recommendations, including suboptimal targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (≤70 mg/dL was the target used by only 16.7{\%} of respondents [40/239]), undertreatment of revascularized patients (31.4{\%} [75/239]), cessation of statin therapy once LDL-C targets were achieved (20.9{\%} [50/239]), and use of different treatment thresholds for patients aged >65 years (41.8{\%} [100/239]) and female patients (46.4{\%} [111/239]). In the adjusted analysis, experienced physicians, interventional cardiologists, and those who pursued continuing medical education activities (journals and conferences) had higher scores (P = 0.005, P = 0.041, P = 0.008, and P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: We found important self-reported departures from recommended lipid-management guidelines among cardiologists in Pakistan.",
keywords = "cardiologist, developing country, lipids, Pakistan, practices",
author = "Gowani, {Saqib A.} and Sana Shoukat and Taqui, {Ather M.} and Nizar Bhulani and Sameer Khalid and Amna Sheikh and Halim, {Muhammad S.} and Sarah Samreen and Jafary, {Fahim H.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1604--1614",
journal = "Clinical Therapeutics",
issn = "0149-2918",
publisher = "Excerpta Medica",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results of a cross-sectional survey about lipid-management practices among cardiologists in Pakistan

T2 - Assessment of adherence to published treatment guidelines

AU - Gowani, Saqib A.

AU - Shoukat, Sana

AU - Taqui, Ather M.

AU - Bhulani, Nizar

AU - Khalid, Sameer

AU - Sheikh, Amna

AU - Halim, Muhammad S.

AU - Samreen, Sarah

AU - Jafary, Fahim H.

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess how closely cardiologists in Pakistan followed published recommendations for lipid management and to identify the factors associated with such behavior. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was delivered in person between September and December 2007 to all cardiologists practicing in 4 major cities in Pakistan (Karachi, Lahore, Quetta, and Peshawar). A standard questionnaire was used to obtain information from cardiologists. Adherence to the guidelines established by the 2004 National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III was computed based on answers to 14 questions; each correct answer (ie, the answer that followed the guidelines) was assigned 1 point, for a maximum cumulative score of 14. Multivariable linear regression was performed to determine the factors independently associated with guideline knowledge. Results: A total of 295 cardiologists were approached; 239 consented to participate (overall response rate, 81.0%). The median score was 9 out of a maximum of 14 (interquartile range, 8-11). There were important points of divergence from practice recommendations, including suboptimal targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (≤70 mg/dL was the target used by only 16.7% of respondents [40/239]), undertreatment of revascularized patients (31.4% [75/239]), cessation of statin therapy once LDL-C targets were achieved (20.9% [50/239]), and use of different treatment thresholds for patients aged >65 years (41.8% [100/239]) and female patients (46.4% [111/239]). In the adjusted analysis, experienced physicians, interventional cardiologists, and those who pursued continuing medical education activities (journals and conferences) had higher scores (P = 0.005, P = 0.041, P = 0.008, and P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: We found important self-reported departures from recommended lipid-management guidelines among cardiologists in Pakistan.

AB - Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess how closely cardiologists in Pakistan followed published recommendations for lipid management and to identify the factors associated with such behavior. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was delivered in person between September and December 2007 to all cardiologists practicing in 4 major cities in Pakistan (Karachi, Lahore, Quetta, and Peshawar). A standard questionnaire was used to obtain information from cardiologists. Adherence to the guidelines established by the 2004 National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III was computed based on answers to 14 questions; each correct answer (ie, the answer that followed the guidelines) was assigned 1 point, for a maximum cumulative score of 14. Multivariable linear regression was performed to determine the factors independently associated with guideline knowledge. Results: A total of 295 cardiologists were approached; 239 consented to participate (overall response rate, 81.0%). The median score was 9 out of a maximum of 14 (interquartile range, 8-11). There were important points of divergence from practice recommendations, including suboptimal targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (≤70 mg/dL was the target used by only 16.7% of respondents [40/239]), undertreatment of revascularized patients (31.4% [75/239]), cessation of statin therapy once LDL-C targets were achieved (20.9% [50/239]), and use of different treatment thresholds for patients aged >65 years (41.8% [100/239]) and female patients (46.4% [111/239]). In the adjusted analysis, experienced physicians, interventional cardiologists, and those who pursued continuing medical education activities (journals and conferences) had higher scores (P = 0.005, P = 0.041, P = 0.008, and P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: We found important self-reported departures from recommended lipid-management guidelines among cardiologists in Pakistan.

KW - cardiologist

KW - developing country

KW - lipids

KW - Pakistan

KW - practices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68649097841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68649097841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.020

DO - 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 19695410

AN - SCOPUS:68649097841

VL - 31

SP - 1604

EP - 1614

JO - Clinical Therapeutics

JF - Clinical Therapeutics

SN - 0149-2918

IS - 7

ER -