TY - JOUR
T1 - Rethinking CME
T2 - An imperative for academic medicine and faculty development
AU - Davis, David A.
AU - Prescott, John
AU - Fordis, C. Michael
AU - Greenberg, Stephen B.
AU - Dewey, Charlene M.
AU - Brigham, Timothy
AU - Lieberman, Steve A.
AU - Rockhold, Robin W.
AU - Lieff, Susan J.
AU - Tenner, Thomas E.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/4
Y1 - 2011/4
N2 - To help address the clinical care gap, a working group discussed the future of faculty development in academic medicine, explored problems within the large, current enterprise devoted to continuing medical education (CME), and described four domains core to its revitalization and reformation. These domains are (1) preparing and supporting an engaged clinician-learner, (2) improving the quality of knowledge or evidence shared, (3) enhancing the means by which to disseminate and implement that knowledge and evidence, and (4) reforming the patient, health care, and regulatory systems in and for which the process of CME exists. Reshaping these domains requires the consideration of a more seamless, evidence-based, and patient-oriented continuum of medical education. Revitalizing CME also requires the full engagement of the academic medical community and its faculty. To achieve the goal of creating a new, more effective, seamless process of CME, the working group recommended an active faculty development process to develop strong clinician-learners, strong involvement of academic health center leaders, the development of an educational home for clinician-learners, and a meaningful national conversation on the subject of CME.
AB - To help address the clinical care gap, a working group discussed the future of faculty development in academic medicine, explored problems within the large, current enterprise devoted to continuing medical education (CME), and described four domains core to its revitalization and reformation. These domains are (1) preparing and supporting an engaged clinician-learner, (2) improving the quality of knowledge or evidence shared, (3) enhancing the means by which to disseminate and implement that knowledge and evidence, and (4) reforming the patient, health care, and regulatory systems in and for which the process of CME exists. Reshaping these domains requires the consideration of a more seamless, evidence-based, and patient-oriented continuum of medical education. Revitalizing CME also requires the full engagement of the academic medical community and its faculty. To achieve the goal of creating a new, more effective, seamless process of CME, the working group recommended an active faculty development process to develop strong clinician-learners, strong involvement of academic health center leaders, the development of an educational home for clinician-learners, and a meaningful national conversation on the subject of CME.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955125018&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955125018&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dfacf
DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dfacf
M3 - Article
C2 - 21346497
AN - SCOPUS:79955125018
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 86
SP - 468
EP - 473
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 4
ER -