TY - JOUR
T1 - Risks of Immunotherapy with Insect Venom
AU - Grant, J. Andrew
PY - 1979/3/8
Y1 - 1979/3/8
N2 - To the Editor: The study by Hunt et al.1 should settle the question of the proper management of patients with insect hypersensitivity. By the use of a single-blind protocol, intentional insect-sting challenge and monitoring of IgG blocking antibody response, the authors unequivocally demonstrate the effectiveness of venom-sac extracts over whole-body extracts. This study analyzed patients with allergic reactions to honeybee and yellow-jacket stings, whereas the principal culprit in regions of the southern United States is the paper nest wasp of the genus polistes.2 In a small group of patients, we have shown that polistes venom is also effective in diagnosing. No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.
AB - To the Editor: The study by Hunt et al.1 should settle the question of the proper management of patients with insect hypersensitivity. By the use of a single-blind protocol, intentional insect-sting challenge and monitoring of IgG blocking antibody response, the authors unequivocally demonstrate the effectiveness of venom-sac extracts over whole-body extracts. This study analyzed patients with allergic reactions to honeybee and yellow-jacket stings, whereas the principal culprit in regions of the southern United States is the paper nest wasp of the genus polistes.2 In a small group of patients, we have shown that polistes venom is also effective in diagnosing. No extract is available for articles shorter than 400 words.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018392277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018392277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJM197903083001016
DO - 10.1056/NEJM197903083001016
M3 - Letter
C2 - 763263
AN - SCOPUS:0018392277
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 300
SP - 565
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 10
ER -