TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications
AU - SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Investigators
AU - Kandzari, David E.
AU - Townsend, Raymond R.
AU - Kario, Kazuomi
AU - Mahfoud, Felix
AU - Weber, Michael A.
AU - Schmieder, Roland E.
AU - Pocock, Stuart
AU - Tsioufis, Konstantinos
AU - Konstantinidis, Dimitrios
AU - Choi, James
AU - East, Cara
AU - Lauder, Lucas
AU - Cohen, Debbie L.
AU - Kobayashi, Taisei
AU - Schmid, Axel
AU - Lee, David P.
AU - Ma, Adrian
AU - Weil, Joachim
AU - Agdirlioglu, Tolga
AU - Schlaich, Markus P.
AU - Shetty, Sharad
AU - Devireddy, Chandan M.
AU - Lea, Janice
AU - Aoki, Jiro
AU - Sharp, Andrew S.P.
AU - Anderson, Richard
AU - Fahy, Martin
AU - DeBruin, Vanessa
AU - Brar, Sandeep
AU - Böhm, Michael
AU - Wang, Yale
AU - Jay, Desmond
AU - McLaurin, Brent
AU - Lomboy, Carl
AU - Allaqaband, Suhail
AU - Jan, Fuad
AU - Gummadi, Bharat
AU - Litt, Marc
AU - Garcia, Fidel
AU - Singh, Jasvindar
AU - Brown, Angela
AU - Paul, Ashley
AU - Sharp, Andrew
AU - Coulson, James
AU - Nanjundappa, Aravinda
AU - Thakker, Ganpat
AU - Campbell, James
AU - Honton, Benjamin
AU - Farah, Bruno
AU - Calhoun, William
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2023/11/7
Y1 - 2023/11/7
N2 - Background: Renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications. Objectives: This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of RDN in the presence of antihypertensive medications. Methods: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded trial enrolling patients from 56 clinical centers worldwide. Patients were prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications. Patients were randomized to radiofrequency RDN or sham control procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 6 months between groups using a Bayesian trial design and analysis. Results: The treatment difference in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 6 months between the RDN group (n = 206; −6.5 ± 10.7 mm Hg) and sham control group (n = 131; −4.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg) was −1.9 mm Hg (95% CI: −4.4 to 0.5 mm Hg; P = 0.12). There was no significant difference between groups in the primary efficacy analysis with a posterior probability of superiority of 0.51 (Bayesian treatment difference: −0.03 mm Hg [95% CI: −2.82 to 2.77 mm Hg]). However, there were changes and increases in medication intensity among sham control patients. RDN was associated with a reduction in office systolic BP compared with sham control at 6 months (adjusted treatment difference: −4.9 mm Hg; P = 0.0015). Night-time BP reductions and win ratio analysis also favored RDN. There was 1 adverse safety event among 253 assessed patients. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between groups in the primary analysis. However, multiple secondary endpoint analyses favored RDN over sham control.
AB - Background: Renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications. Objectives: This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of RDN in the presence of antihypertensive medications. Methods: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded trial enrolling patients from 56 clinical centers worldwide. Patients were prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications. Patients were randomized to radiofrequency RDN or sham control procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 6 months between groups using a Bayesian trial design and analysis. Results: The treatment difference in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 6 months between the RDN group (n = 206; −6.5 ± 10.7 mm Hg) and sham control group (n = 131; −4.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg) was −1.9 mm Hg (95% CI: −4.4 to 0.5 mm Hg; P = 0.12). There was no significant difference between groups in the primary efficacy analysis with a posterior probability of superiority of 0.51 (Bayesian treatment difference: −0.03 mm Hg [95% CI: −2.82 to 2.77 mm Hg]). However, there were changes and increases in medication intensity among sham control patients. RDN was associated with a reduction in office systolic BP compared with sham control at 6 months (adjusted treatment difference: −4.9 mm Hg; P = 0.0015). Night-time BP reductions and win ratio analysis also favored RDN. There was 1 adverse safety event among 253 assessed patients. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between groups in the primary analysis. However, multiple secondary endpoint analyses favored RDN over sham control.
KW - Bayesian trial
KW - antihypertensive medications
KW - renal denervation
KW - uncontrolled hypertension
KW - win ratio
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174464887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85174464887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.045
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.045
M3 - Article
C2 - 37914510
AN - SCOPUS:85174464887
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 82
SP - 1809
EP - 1823
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 19
ER -