Screening for bipolar disorder in the community

Robert M A Hirschfeld, Joseph R. Calabrese, Myrna M. Weissman, Michael Reed, Marilyn A. Davies, Mark A. Frye, Paul E. Keck, Lydia Lewis, Susan L. McElroy, James P. McNulty, Karen Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

489 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Our goal was to estimate the rate of positive screens for bipolar I and bipolar II disorders in the general population of the United States. Method: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), a validated screening instrument for bipolar I and II disorders, was sent to a sample of 127,800 people selected to represent the U.S. adult population by demographic variables. 85,358 subjects (66.8% response rate) that were 18 years of age or above returned the survey and had usable data. Of the nonrespondents, 3404 subjects matched demographically to the 2000 U.S. Census data completed a telephone interview to estimate nonresponse bias. Results: The overall positive screen rate for bipolar I and II disorders, weighted to match the 2000 U.S. Census demographics, was 3.4%. When adjusted for the nonresponse bias, the rate rose to 3.7%. Only 19.8% of the individuals with positive screens for bipolar I or II disorders reported that they had previously received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder from a physician, whereas 31.2% reported receiving a diagnosis of unipolar depression. An additional 49.0% reported receiving no diagnosis of either bipolar disorder or unipolar depression. Positive screens were more frequent in young adults and low income households. The rates of migraine, allergies, asthma, and alcohol and drug abuse were substantially higher among those with positive screens. Conclusion: The positive MDQ screen rate of 3.7% suggests that nearly 4% of American adults may suffer from bipolar I and II disorders. Young adults and individuals with lower income are at greater risk for this largely underdiagnosed disorder.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-59
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume64
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Bipolar Disorder
Censuses
Depressive Disorder
Mood Disorders
Young Adult
Demography
Migraine Disorders
Population
Alcoholism
Substance-Related Disorders
Hypersensitivity
Asthma
Interviews
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Calabrese, J. R., Weissman, M. M., Reed, M., Davies, M. A., Frye, M. A., ... Wagner, K. (2003). Screening for bipolar disorder in the community. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64(1), 53-59.

Screening for bipolar disorder in the community. / Hirschfeld, Robert M A; Calabrese, Joseph R.; Weissman, Myrna M.; Reed, Michael; Davies, Marilyn A.; Frye, Mark A.; Keck, Paul E.; Lewis, Lydia; McElroy, Susan L.; McNulty, James P.; Wagner, Karen.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 53-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hirschfeld, RMA, Calabrese, JR, Weissman, MM, Reed, M, Davies, MA, Frye, MA, Keck, PE, Lewis, L, McElroy, SL, McNulty, JP & Wagner, K 2003, 'Screening for bipolar disorder in the community', Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 53-59.
Hirschfeld RMA, Calabrese JR, Weissman MM, Reed M, Davies MA, Frye MA et al. Screening for bipolar disorder in the community. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2003 Jan 1;64(1):53-59.
Hirschfeld, Robert M A ; Calabrese, Joseph R. ; Weissman, Myrna M. ; Reed, Michael ; Davies, Marilyn A. ; Frye, Mark A. ; Keck, Paul E. ; Lewis, Lydia ; McElroy, Susan L. ; McNulty, James P. ; Wagner, Karen. / Screening for bipolar disorder in the community. In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2003 ; Vol. 64, No. 1. pp. 53-59.
@article{199e3d6941554178a372c4cb5465445e,
title = "Screening for bipolar disorder in the community",
abstract = "Background: Our goal was to estimate the rate of positive screens for bipolar I and bipolar II disorders in the general population of the United States. Method: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), a validated screening instrument for bipolar I and II disorders, was sent to a sample of 127,800 people selected to represent the U.S. adult population by demographic variables. 85,358 subjects (66.8{\%} response rate) that were 18 years of age or above returned the survey and had usable data. Of the nonrespondents, 3404 subjects matched demographically to the 2000 U.S. Census data completed a telephone interview to estimate nonresponse bias. Results: The overall positive screen rate for bipolar I and II disorders, weighted to match the 2000 U.S. Census demographics, was 3.4{\%}. When adjusted for the nonresponse bias, the rate rose to 3.7{\%}. Only 19.8{\%} of the individuals with positive screens for bipolar I or II disorders reported that they had previously received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder from a physician, whereas 31.2{\%} reported receiving a diagnosis of unipolar depression. An additional 49.0{\%} reported receiving no diagnosis of either bipolar disorder or unipolar depression. Positive screens were more frequent in young adults and low income households. The rates of migraine, allergies, asthma, and alcohol and drug abuse were substantially higher among those with positive screens. Conclusion: The positive MDQ screen rate of 3.7{\%} suggests that nearly 4{\%} of American adults may suffer from bipolar I and II disorders. Young adults and individuals with lower income are at greater risk for this largely underdiagnosed disorder.",
author = "Hirschfeld, {Robert M A} and Calabrese, {Joseph R.} and Weissman, {Myrna M.} and Michael Reed and Davies, {Marilyn A.} and Frye, {Mark A.} and Keck, {Paul E.} and Lydia Lewis and McElroy, {Susan L.} and McNulty, {James P.} and Karen Wagner",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "53--59",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-6689",
publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening for bipolar disorder in the community

AU - Hirschfeld, Robert M A

AU - Calabrese, Joseph R.

AU - Weissman, Myrna M.

AU - Reed, Michael

AU - Davies, Marilyn A.

AU - Frye, Mark A.

AU - Keck, Paul E.

AU - Lewis, Lydia

AU - McElroy, Susan L.

AU - McNulty, James P.

AU - Wagner, Karen

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Background: Our goal was to estimate the rate of positive screens for bipolar I and bipolar II disorders in the general population of the United States. Method: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), a validated screening instrument for bipolar I and II disorders, was sent to a sample of 127,800 people selected to represent the U.S. adult population by demographic variables. 85,358 subjects (66.8% response rate) that were 18 years of age or above returned the survey and had usable data. Of the nonrespondents, 3404 subjects matched demographically to the 2000 U.S. Census data completed a telephone interview to estimate nonresponse bias. Results: The overall positive screen rate for bipolar I and II disorders, weighted to match the 2000 U.S. Census demographics, was 3.4%. When adjusted for the nonresponse bias, the rate rose to 3.7%. Only 19.8% of the individuals with positive screens for bipolar I or II disorders reported that they had previously received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder from a physician, whereas 31.2% reported receiving a diagnosis of unipolar depression. An additional 49.0% reported receiving no diagnosis of either bipolar disorder or unipolar depression. Positive screens were more frequent in young adults and low income households. The rates of migraine, allergies, asthma, and alcohol and drug abuse were substantially higher among those with positive screens. Conclusion: The positive MDQ screen rate of 3.7% suggests that nearly 4% of American adults may suffer from bipolar I and II disorders. Young adults and individuals with lower income are at greater risk for this largely underdiagnosed disorder.

AB - Background: Our goal was to estimate the rate of positive screens for bipolar I and bipolar II disorders in the general population of the United States. Method: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), a validated screening instrument for bipolar I and II disorders, was sent to a sample of 127,800 people selected to represent the U.S. adult population by demographic variables. 85,358 subjects (66.8% response rate) that were 18 years of age or above returned the survey and had usable data. Of the nonrespondents, 3404 subjects matched demographically to the 2000 U.S. Census data completed a telephone interview to estimate nonresponse bias. Results: The overall positive screen rate for bipolar I and II disorders, weighted to match the 2000 U.S. Census demographics, was 3.4%. When adjusted for the nonresponse bias, the rate rose to 3.7%. Only 19.8% of the individuals with positive screens for bipolar I or II disorders reported that they had previously received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder from a physician, whereas 31.2% reported receiving a diagnosis of unipolar depression. An additional 49.0% reported receiving no diagnosis of either bipolar disorder or unipolar depression. Positive screens were more frequent in young adults and low income households. The rates of migraine, allergies, asthma, and alcohol and drug abuse were substantially higher among those with positive screens. Conclusion: The positive MDQ screen rate of 3.7% suggests that nearly 4% of American adults may suffer from bipolar I and II disorders. Young adults and individuals with lower income are at greater risk for this largely underdiagnosed disorder.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037269568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037269568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 53

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

SN - 0160-6689

IS - 1

ER -