Serologic testing for amoebiasis

Marcel Patterson, George R. Healy, Joseph Shabot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The diagnosis of amoebiasis presents problems, particularly if one relies on finding the organism. Thus, serologic tests are expedient. A gel diffusion precipitin test (GDP), commercially available, simple to perform, and inexpensive, was compared with the indirect hemagglutination test (IHA). 257 Patients' sera were tested; 14 had amoebic colitis, 21 had amoebic liver abscess, 63 had suspected amoebic liver abscess, and 46 had inflammatory bowel disease. GDP tests were positive in 85% of amoebic colitis and 95% of amoebic liver abscess patients; IHA was positive in 91% of amoebic colitis and 94% of abscess patients. Within 6 mo, GDP tests became negative in 66% of patients. IHA tests were observed positive up to 20 yr. The performance characteristics of diagnostic methods in amoebiasis, fecal examination, IHA and GDP, show serologic tests have superior sensitivity and predictive value in recognizing invasive disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-141
Number of pages6
JournalGastroenterology
Volume78
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1980

Fingerprint

Precipitin Tests
Hemagglutination Tests
Amebiasis
Immunodiffusion
Amoebic Dysentery
Amoebic Liver Abscess
Serologic Tests
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Abscess
Serum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Patterson, M., Healy, G. R., & Shabot, J. (1980). Serologic testing for amoebiasis. Gastroenterology, 78(1), 136-141.

Serologic testing for amoebiasis. / Patterson, Marcel; Healy, George R.; Shabot, Joseph.

In: Gastroenterology, Vol. 78, No. 1, 1980, p. 136-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patterson, M, Healy, GR & Shabot, J 1980, 'Serologic testing for amoebiasis', Gastroenterology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 136-141.
Patterson M, Healy GR, Shabot J. Serologic testing for amoebiasis. Gastroenterology. 1980;78(1):136-141.
Patterson, Marcel ; Healy, George R. ; Shabot, Joseph. / Serologic testing for amoebiasis. In: Gastroenterology. 1980 ; Vol. 78, No. 1. pp. 136-141.
@article{20029243bf994ac8bbf5135f4e08f938,
title = "Serologic testing for amoebiasis",
abstract = "The diagnosis of amoebiasis presents problems, particularly if one relies on finding the organism. Thus, serologic tests are expedient. A gel diffusion precipitin test (GDP), commercially available, simple to perform, and inexpensive, was compared with the indirect hemagglutination test (IHA). 257 Patients' sera were tested; 14 had amoebic colitis, 21 had amoebic liver abscess, 63 had suspected amoebic liver abscess, and 46 had inflammatory bowel disease. GDP tests were positive in 85{\%} of amoebic colitis and 95{\%} of amoebic liver abscess patients; IHA was positive in 91{\%} of amoebic colitis and 94{\%} of abscess patients. Within 6 mo, GDP tests became negative in 66{\%} of patients. IHA tests were observed positive up to 20 yr. The performance characteristics of diagnostic methods in amoebiasis, fecal examination, IHA and GDP, show serologic tests have superior sensitivity and predictive value in recognizing invasive disease.",
author = "Marcel Patterson and Healy, {George R.} and Joseph Shabot",
year = "1980",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "136--141",
journal = "Gastroenterology",
issn = "0016-5085",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Serologic testing for amoebiasis

AU - Patterson, Marcel

AU - Healy, George R.

AU - Shabot, Joseph

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - The diagnosis of amoebiasis presents problems, particularly if one relies on finding the organism. Thus, serologic tests are expedient. A gel diffusion precipitin test (GDP), commercially available, simple to perform, and inexpensive, was compared with the indirect hemagglutination test (IHA). 257 Patients' sera were tested; 14 had amoebic colitis, 21 had amoebic liver abscess, 63 had suspected amoebic liver abscess, and 46 had inflammatory bowel disease. GDP tests were positive in 85% of amoebic colitis and 95% of amoebic liver abscess patients; IHA was positive in 91% of amoebic colitis and 94% of abscess patients. Within 6 mo, GDP tests became negative in 66% of patients. IHA tests were observed positive up to 20 yr. The performance characteristics of diagnostic methods in amoebiasis, fecal examination, IHA and GDP, show serologic tests have superior sensitivity and predictive value in recognizing invasive disease.

AB - The diagnosis of amoebiasis presents problems, particularly if one relies on finding the organism. Thus, serologic tests are expedient. A gel diffusion precipitin test (GDP), commercially available, simple to perform, and inexpensive, was compared with the indirect hemagglutination test (IHA). 257 Patients' sera were tested; 14 had amoebic colitis, 21 had amoebic liver abscess, 63 had suspected amoebic liver abscess, and 46 had inflammatory bowel disease. GDP tests were positive in 85% of amoebic colitis and 95% of amoebic liver abscess patients; IHA was positive in 91% of amoebic colitis and 94% of abscess patients. Within 6 mo, GDP tests became negative in 66% of patients. IHA tests were observed positive up to 20 yr. The performance characteristics of diagnostic methods in amoebiasis, fecal examination, IHA and GDP, show serologic tests have superior sensitivity and predictive value in recognizing invasive disease.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018865865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018865865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 136

EP - 141

JO - Gastroenterology

JF - Gastroenterology

SN - 0016-5085

IS - 1

ER -