Significance of intraarticular fluid without visible fracture in children

L. E. Swischuk, C. K. Hayden, M. C. Kupfer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The radiographs and clinical records of 128 patients with joint trauma and radiographic evidence of intraarticular fluid but no visible fracture were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 63 with follow-up films and 65 with no follow-up films. Clinically, the latter group had less serious injuries and generally were instructed not to return unless symptoms worsened abruptly or if pain persisted for longer than 1 week. The group with follow-up films consisted of those patients with more serious injuries, and mandatory repeat radiographs were obtained 10-14 days after initial injury. Findings suggest that if a fracture was not seen on the first study, chances of its being present and missed in the ankle and elbow were small (7% and 15%) but were high (67%) in the wrist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1261-1262
Number of pages2
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume142
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Elbow
Wrist
Ankle
Joints
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Swischuk, L. E., Hayden, C. K., & Kupfer, M. C. (1984). Significance of intraarticular fluid without visible fracture in children. American Journal of Roentgenology, 142(6), 1261-1262.

Significance of intraarticular fluid without visible fracture in children. / Swischuk, L. E.; Hayden, C. K.; Kupfer, M. C.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 142, No. 6, 1984, p. 1261-1262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Swischuk, LE, Hayden, CK & Kupfer, MC 1984, 'Significance of intraarticular fluid without visible fracture in children', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 1261-1262.
Swischuk, L. E. ; Hayden, C. K. ; Kupfer, M. C. / Significance of intraarticular fluid without visible fracture in children. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1984 ; Vol. 142, No. 6. pp. 1261-1262.
@article{61c7b626cbf842f38c7cebb56450155e,
title = "Significance of intraarticular fluid without visible fracture in children",
abstract = "The radiographs and clinical records of 128 patients with joint trauma and radiographic evidence of intraarticular fluid but no visible fracture were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 63 with follow-up films and 65 with no follow-up films. Clinically, the latter group had less serious injuries and generally were instructed not to return unless symptoms worsened abruptly or if pain persisted for longer than 1 week. The group with follow-up films consisted of those patients with more serious injuries, and mandatory repeat radiographs were obtained 10-14 days after initial injury. Findings suggest that if a fracture was not seen on the first study, chances of its being present and missed in the ankle and elbow were small (7{\%} and 15{\%}) but were high (67{\%}) in the wrist.",
author = "Swischuk, {L. E.} and Hayden, {C. K.} and Kupfer, {M. C.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "1261--1262",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Significance of intraarticular fluid without visible fracture in children

AU - Swischuk, L. E.

AU - Hayden, C. K.

AU - Kupfer, M. C.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - The radiographs and clinical records of 128 patients with joint trauma and radiographic evidence of intraarticular fluid but no visible fracture were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 63 with follow-up films and 65 with no follow-up films. Clinically, the latter group had less serious injuries and generally were instructed not to return unless symptoms worsened abruptly or if pain persisted for longer than 1 week. The group with follow-up films consisted of those patients with more serious injuries, and mandatory repeat radiographs were obtained 10-14 days after initial injury. Findings suggest that if a fracture was not seen on the first study, chances of its being present and missed in the ankle and elbow were small (7% and 15%) but were high (67%) in the wrist.

AB - The radiographs and clinical records of 128 patients with joint trauma and radiographic evidence of intraarticular fluid but no visible fracture were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 63 with follow-up films and 65 with no follow-up films. Clinically, the latter group had less serious injuries and generally were instructed not to return unless symptoms worsened abruptly or if pain persisted for longer than 1 week. The group with follow-up films consisted of those patients with more serious injuries, and mandatory repeat radiographs were obtained 10-14 days after initial injury. Findings suggest that if a fracture was not seen on the first study, chances of its being present and missed in the ankle and elbow were small (7% and 15%) but were high (67%) in the wrist.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021262969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021262969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6609619

AN - SCOPUS:0021262969

VL - 142

SP - 1261

EP - 1262

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 6

ER -