Similar Clinical Outcomes for THAs With and Without Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy

Derek F. Amanatullah, Louis Stryker, Perry Schoenecker, Michael J. Taunton, John C. Clohisy, Robert T. Trousdale, Rafael J. Sierra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Results: With the numbers available, there was no difference in complication or revision rates between the two groups (p = 0.489 and 1.000, respectively); however, a post hoc power analysis showed our study was underpowered to detect a difference in the rate of postoperative complications or revision THA. There was marked improvement in Harris hip score with THA after periacetabular osteotomy (p 

Conclusions: This study did not detect any differences in the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing THA after periacetabular osteotomy done with a modern abductor-sparing approach when compared with a matched cohort undergoing THA for DDH. However, even with patients tallied across two high-volume centers during nearly 15 years, our study was underpowered to detect potentially important differences between the THA after periacetabular osteotomy group and the THA for DDH group. The data in this report are suitable as pilot data for future studies and for systematic reviews. Larger multicenter studies are needed to understand how the technical challenges of THA after periacetabular osteotomy affect postoperative complications and revision THA.

Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Introduction: Some patients opt to undergo conversion to a THA for continued pain or progression of hip arthritis after periacetabular osteotomy. Whether patients are at greater risk for postoperative complications, revision THA, poor clinical outcomes, or compromised radiographic results after periacetabular osteotomy is debatable.

Questions/purposes: When compared with a matched cohort of patients who underwent THAs for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) without previous periacetabular osteotomy, we asked whether a THA after a periacetabular osteotomy has (1) a higher complication rate, (2) a higher likelihood of resulting in revision THA, (3) comparable improvements in Harris hip score, and (4) comparable radiographic results.

Patients and Methods: A multicenter retrospective review of 562 patients undergoing 645 periacetabular osteotomies was performed. Twenty-three hips in 22 patients underwent a THA after periacetabular osteotomy. The patients were matched for age, sex, and BMI with 23 hips in 23 patients with DDH undergoing THA without a history of periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum followup for both groups of patients was 2 years (mean, 10 ± 4 years and 6 ± 4 years, respectively). Comparisons were made to answer the study questions based on a retrospective review from prospectively maintained registries of clinical and radiographic information at two participating centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-691
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Volume473
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tacrine
Osteotomy
Hip Dislocation
Hip

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Amanatullah, D. F., Stryker, L., Schoenecker, P., Taunton, M. J., Clohisy, J. C., Trousdale, R. T., & Sierra, R. J. (2014). Similar Clinical Outcomes for THAs With and Without Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 473(2), 685-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4026-7

Similar Clinical Outcomes for THAs With and Without Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy. / Amanatullah, Derek F.; Stryker, Louis; Schoenecker, Perry; Taunton, Michael J.; Clohisy, John C.; Trousdale, Robert T.; Sierra, Rafael J.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 473, No. 2, 2014, p. 685-691.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Amanatullah, DF, Stryker, L, Schoenecker, P, Taunton, MJ, Clohisy, JC, Trousdale, RT & Sierra, RJ 2014, 'Similar Clinical Outcomes for THAs With and Without Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy', Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 473, no. 2, pp. 685-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4026-7
Amanatullah DF, Stryker L, Schoenecker P, Taunton MJ, Clohisy JC, Trousdale RT et al. Similar Clinical Outcomes for THAs With and Without Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2014;473(2):685-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4026-7
Amanatullah, Derek F. ; Stryker, Louis ; Schoenecker, Perry ; Taunton, Michael J. ; Clohisy, John C. ; Trousdale, Robert T. ; Sierra, Rafael J. / Similar Clinical Outcomes for THAs With and Without Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2014 ; Vol. 473, No. 2. pp. 685-691.
@article{cc287dabd8fd4c37bc8e03c4be2f661c,
title = "Similar Clinical Outcomes for THAs With and Without Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy",
abstract = "Results: With the numbers available, there was no difference in complication or revision rates between the two groups (p = 0.489 and 1.000, respectively); however, a post hoc power analysis showed our study was underpowered to detect a difference in the rate of postoperative complications or revision THA. There was marked improvement in Harris hip score with THA after periacetabular osteotomy (p Conclusions: This study did not detect any differences in the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing THA after periacetabular osteotomy done with a modern abductor-sparing approach when compared with a matched cohort undergoing THA for DDH. However, even with patients tallied across two high-volume centers during nearly 15 years, our study was underpowered to detect potentially important differences between the THA after periacetabular osteotomy group and the THA for DDH group. The data in this report are suitable as pilot data for future studies and for systematic reviews. Larger multicenter studies are needed to understand how the technical challenges of THA after periacetabular osteotomy affect postoperative complications and revision THA.Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.Introduction: Some patients opt to undergo conversion to a THA for continued pain or progression of hip arthritis after periacetabular osteotomy. Whether patients are at greater risk for postoperative complications, revision THA, poor clinical outcomes, or compromised radiographic results after periacetabular osteotomy is debatable.Questions/purposes: When compared with a matched cohort of patients who underwent THAs for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) without previous periacetabular osteotomy, we asked whether a THA after a periacetabular osteotomy has (1) a higher complication rate, (2) a higher likelihood of resulting in revision THA, (3) comparable improvements in Harris hip score, and (4) comparable radiographic results.Patients and Methods: A multicenter retrospective review of 562 patients undergoing 645 periacetabular osteotomies was performed. Twenty-three hips in 22 patients underwent a THA after periacetabular osteotomy. The patients were matched for age, sex, and BMI with 23 hips in 23 patients with DDH undergoing THA without a history of periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum followup for both groups of patients was 2 years (mean, 10 ± 4 years and 6 ± 4 years, respectively). Comparisons were made to answer the study questions based on a retrospective review from prospectively maintained registries of clinical and radiographic information at two participating centers.",
author = "Amanatullah, {Derek F.} and Louis Stryker and Perry Schoenecker and Taunton, {Michael J.} and Clohisy, {John C.} and Trousdale, {Robert T.} and Sierra, {Rafael J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11999-014-4026-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "473",
pages = "685--691",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Similar Clinical Outcomes for THAs With and Without Prior Periacetabular Osteotomy

AU - Amanatullah, Derek F.

AU - Stryker, Louis

AU - Schoenecker, Perry

AU - Taunton, Michael J.

AU - Clohisy, John C.

AU - Trousdale, Robert T.

AU - Sierra, Rafael J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Results: With the numbers available, there was no difference in complication or revision rates between the two groups (p = 0.489 and 1.000, respectively); however, a post hoc power analysis showed our study was underpowered to detect a difference in the rate of postoperative complications or revision THA. There was marked improvement in Harris hip score with THA after periacetabular osteotomy (p Conclusions: This study did not detect any differences in the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing THA after periacetabular osteotomy done with a modern abductor-sparing approach when compared with a matched cohort undergoing THA for DDH. However, even with patients tallied across two high-volume centers during nearly 15 years, our study was underpowered to detect potentially important differences between the THA after periacetabular osteotomy group and the THA for DDH group. The data in this report are suitable as pilot data for future studies and for systematic reviews. Larger multicenter studies are needed to understand how the technical challenges of THA after periacetabular osteotomy affect postoperative complications and revision THA.Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.Introduction: Some patients opt to undergo conversion to a THA for continued pain or progression of hip arthritis after periacetabular osteotomy. Whether patients are at greater risk for postoperative complications, revision THA, poor clinical outcomes, or compromised radiographic results after periacetabular osteotomy is debatable.Questions/purposes: When compared with a matched cohort of patients who underwent THAs for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) without previous periacetabular osteotomy, we asked whether a THA after a periacetabular osteotomy has (1) a higher complication rate, (2) a higher likelihood of resulting in revision THA, (3) comparable improvements in Harris hip score, and (4) comparable radiographic results.Patients and Methods: A multicenter retrospective review of 562 patients undergoing 645 periacetabular osteotomies was performed. Twenty-three hips in 22 patients underwent a THA after periacetabular osteotomy. The patients were matched for age, sex, and BMI with 23 hips in 23 patients with DDH undergoing THA without a history of periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum followup for both groups of patients was 2 years (mean, 10 ± 4 years and 6 ± 4 years, respectively). Comparisons were made to answer the study questions based on a retrospective review from prospectively maintained registries of clinical and radiographic information at two participating centers.

AB - Results: With the numbers available, there was no difference in complication or revision rates between the two groups (p = 0.489 and 1.000, respectively); however, a post hoc power analysis showed our study was underpowered to detect a difference in the rate of postoperative complications or revision THA. There was marked improvement in Harris hip score with THA after periacetabular osteotomy (p Conclusions: This study did not detect any differences in the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing THA after periacetabular osteotomy done with a modern abductor-sparing approach when compared with a matched cohort undergoing THA for DDH. However, even with patients tallied across two high-volume centers during nearly 15 years, our study was underpowered to detect potentially important differences between the THA after periacetabular osteotomy group and the THA for DDH group. The data in this report are suitable as pilot data for future studies and for systematic reviews. Larger multicenter studies are needed to understand how the technical challenges of THA after periacetabular osteotomy affect postoperative complications and revision THA.Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.Introduction: Some patients opt to undergo conversion to a THA for continued pain or progression of hip arthritis after periacetabular osteotomy. Whether patients are at greater risk for postoperative complications, revision THA, poor clinical outcomes, or compromised radiographic results after periacetabular osteotomy is debatable.Questions/purposes: When compared with a matched cohort of patients who underwent THAs for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) without previous periacetabular osteotomy, we asked whether a THA after a periacetabular osteotomy has (1) a higher complication rate, (2) a higher likelihood of resulting in revision THA, (3) comparable improvements in Harris hip score, and (4) comparable radiographic results.Patients and Methods: A multicenter retrospective review of 562 patients undergoing 645 periacetabular osteotomies was performed. Twenty-three hips in 22 patients underwent a THA after periacetabular osteotomy. The patients were matched for age, sex, and BMI with 23 hips in 23 patients with DDH undergoing THA without a history of periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum followup for both groups of patients was 2 years (mean, 10 ± 4 years and 6 ± 4 years, respectively). Comparisons were made to answer the study questions based on a retrospective review from prospectively maintained registries of clinical and radiographic information at two participating centers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921051285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921051285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11999-014-4026-7

DO - 10.1007/s11999-014-4026-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 25359629

AN - SCOPUS:84921051285

VL - 473

SP - 685

EP - 691

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 2

ER -