Single bone fixation versus both bone fixation for pediatric unstable forearm fractures: A systematic review and metaanalysis

Bicheng Yong, Zhe Yuan, Jingchun Li, Yiqiang Li, Edward Southern, Federico Canavese, Hongwen Xu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is uncertain whether single bone fixation is comparable to both bone fixation in the treatment of unstable both bone forearm fractures in children. Materials and Methods: A systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database searches was performed on October 1, 2015 on English language scientific literature only. Clinical study designs comparing single bone fixation with both bone fixation of pediatric both bone forearm fractures were included. Studies of only one treatment modality were excluded from the study. Studies eligible for inclusion were assessed using the risk of bias tool for nonrandomized studies. Results: Metaanalysis points to no significant differences in re-angulation, loss of rotation, union time and complications between single bone and both bone fixation. However, the published research lacks quality. Conclusions: Despite scattered evidence and small sample sizes, the metaanalysis suggests single bone fixation can be considered a suitable alternative for both bone forearm fractures in children, as it carries less time in surgery and less cost without compromise in final functional outcome compared to double-bone fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-535
Number of pages7
JournalIndian Journal of Orthopaedics
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Forearm
Pediatrics
Bone and Bones
Bone Fractures
Literature
PubMed
Sample Size
Libraries
Language
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics
Research

Keywords

  • both bone fixation MeSH terms: Pediatrics
  • Children
  • forearm
  • forearm fractures
  • fracture fixation
  • single bone fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Single bone fixation versus both bone fixation for pediatric unstable forearm fractures : A systematic review and metaanalysis. / Yong, Bicheng; Yuan, Zhe; Li, Jingchun; Li, Yiqiang; Southern, Edward; Canavese, Federico; Xu, Hongwen.

In: Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, Vol. 52, No. 5, 01.09.2018, p. 529-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yong, Bicheng ; Yuan, Zhe ; Li, Jingchun ; Li, Yiqiang ; Southern, Edward ; Canavese, Federico ; Xu, Hongwen. / Single bone fixation versus both bone fixation for pediatric unstable forearm fractures : A systematic review and metaanalysis. In: Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2018 ; Vol. 52, No. 5. pp. 529-535.
@article{221641fad1e340d9863b01530521c111,
title = "Single bone fixation versus both bone fixation for pediatric unstable forearm fractures: A systematic review and metaanalysis",
abstract = "Background: It is uncertain whether single bone fixation is comparable to both bone fixation in the treatment of unstable both bone forearm fractures in children. Materials and Methods: A systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database searches was performed on October 1, 2015 on English language scientific literature only. Clinical study designs comparing single bone fixation with both bone fixation of pediatric both bone forearm fractures were included. Studies of only one treatment modality were excluded from the study. Studies eligible for inclusion were assessed using the risk of bias tool for nonrandomized studies. Results: Metaanalysis points to no significant differences in re-angulation, loss of rotation, union time and complications between single bone and both bone fixation. However, the published research lacks quality. Conclusions: Despite scattered evidence and small sample sizes, the metaanalysis suggests single bone fixation can be considered a suitable alternative for both bone forearm fractures in children, as it carries less time in surgery and less cost without compromise in final functional outcome compared to double-bone fixation.",
keywords = "both bone fixation MeSH terms: Pediatrics, Children, forearm, forearm fractures, fracture fixation, single bone fixation",
author = "Bicheng Yong and Zhe Yuan and Jingchun Li and Yiqiang Li and Edward Southern and Federico Canavese and Hongwen Xu",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_125_17",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "529--535",
journal = "Indian Journal of Orthopaedics",
issn = "0019-5413",
publisher = "Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single bone fixation versus both bone fixation for pediatric unstable forearm fractures

T2 - A systematic review and metaanalysis

AU - Yong, Bicheng

AU - Yuan, Zhe

AU - Li, Jingchun

AU - Li, Yiqiang

AU - Southern, Edward

AU - Canavese, Federico

AU - Xu, Hongwen

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Background: It is uncertain whether single bone fixation is comparable to both bone fixation in the treatment of unstable both bone forearm fractures in children. Materials and Methods: A systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database searches was performed on October 1, 2015 on English language scientific literature only. Clinical study designs comparing single bone fixation with both bone fixation of pediatric both bone forearm fractures were included. Studies of only one treatment modality were excluded from the study. Studies eligible for inclusion were assessed using the risk of bias tool for nonrandomized studies. Results: Metaanalysis points to no significant differences in re-angulation, loss of rotation, union time and complications between single bone and both bone fixation. However, the published research lacks quality. Conclusions: Despite scattered evidence and small sample sizes, the metaanalysis suggests single bone fixation can be considered a suitable alternative for both bone forearm fractures in children, as it carries less time in surgery and less cost without compromise in final functional outcome compared to double-bone fixation.

AB - Background: It is uncertain whether single bone fixation is comparable to both bone fixation in the treatment of unstable both bone forearm fractures in children. Materials and Methods: A systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database searches was performed on October 1, 2015 on English language scientific literature only. Clinical study designs comparing single bone fixation with both bone fixation of pediatric both bone forearm fractures were included. Studies of only one treatment modality were excluded from the study. Studies eligible for inclusion were assessed using the risk of bias tool for nonrandomized studies. Results: Metaanalysis points to no significant differences in re-angulation, loss of rotation, union time and complications between single bone and both bone fixation. However, the published research lacks quality. Conclusions: Despite scattered evidence and small sample sizes, the metaanalysis suggests single bone fixation can be considered a suitable alternative for both bone forearm fractures in children, as it carries less time in surgery and less cost without compromise in final functional outcome compared to double-bone fixation.

KW - both bone fixation MeSH terms: Pediatrics

KW - Children

KW - forearm

KW - forearm fractures

KW - fracture fixation

KW - single bone fixation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054307178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054307178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_125_17

DO - 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_125_17

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85054307178

VL - 52

SP - 529

EP - 535

JO - Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

JF - Indian Journal of Orthopaedics

SN - 0019-5413

IS - 5

ER -