Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: Issues and methods

James E. Graham, Amol Karmarkar, Kenneth Ottenbacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conventional research methods, including randomized controlled trials, are powerful techniques for determining the efficacy of interventions. These designs, however, have practical limitations when applied to many rehabilitation settings and research questions. Alternative methods are available that can supplement findings from traditional research designs and improve our ability to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for individual patients. The focus on individual patients is an important element of evidenced-based rehabilitation. This article examines one such alternate approach: small-N research designs. Small-N designs usually focus on 10 or fewer participants whose behavior (outcomes) are measured repeatedly and compared over time. The advantages and limitations of various small-N designs are described and illustrated using 3 examples from the rehabilitation literature. The challenges and opportunities of applying small-N designs to enhance evidence-based rehabilitation are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume93
Issue number8 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint

Research Design
Rehabilitation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research
Rehabilitation Research

Keywords

  • Evaluation studies as topic
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Rehabilitation
  • Research design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation : Issues and methods. / Graham, James E.; Karmarkar, Amol; Ottenbacher, Kenneth.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 93, No. 8 SUPPL., 08.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84c4d2bcd7354d62984206404b5bc971,
title = "Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: Issues and methods",
abstract = "Conventional research methods, including randomized controlled trials, are powerful techniques for determining the efficacy of interventions. These designs, however, have practical limitations when applied to many rehabilitation settings and research questions. Alternative methods are available that can supplement findings from traditional research designs and improve our ability to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for individual patients. The focus on individual patients is an important element of evidenced-based rehabilitation. This article examines one such alternate approach: small-N research designs. Small-N designs usually focus on 10 or fewer participants whose behavior (outcomes) are measured repeatedly and compared over time. The advantages and limitations of various small-N designs are described and illustrated using 3 examples from the rehabilitation literature. The challenges and opportunities of applying small-N designs to enhance evidence-based rehabilitation are discussed.",
keywords = "Evaluation studies as topic, Evidence-based practice, Rehabilitation, Research design",
author = "Graham, {James E.} and Amol Karmarkar and Kenneth Ottenbacher",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "8 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation

T2 - Issues and methods

AU - Graham, James E.

AU - Karmarkar, Amol

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Conventional research methods, including randomized controlled trials, are powerful techniques for determining the efficacy of interventions. These designs, however, have practical limitations when applied to many rehabilitation settings and research questions. Alternative methods are available that can supplement findings from traditional research designs and improve our ability to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for individual patients. The focus on individual patients is an important element of evidenced-based rehabilitation. This article examines one such alternate approach: small-N research designs. Small-N designs usually focus on 10 or fewer participants whose behavior (outcomes) are measured repeatedly and compared over time. The advantages and limitations of various small-N designs are described and illustrated using 3 examples from the rehabilitation literature. The challenges and opportunities of applying small-N designs to enhance evidence-based rehabilitation are discussed.

AB - Conventional research methods, including randomized controlled trials, are powerful techniques for determining the efficacy of interventions. These designs, however, have practical limitations when applied to many rehabilitation settings and research questions. Alternative methods are available that can supplement findings from traditional research designs and improve our ability to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for individual patients. The focus on individual patients is an important element of evidenced-based rehabilitation. This article examines one such alternate approach: small-N research designs. Small-N designs usually focus on 10 or fewer participants whose behavior (outcomes) are measured repeatedly and compared over time. The advantages and limitations of various small-N designs are described and illustrated using 3 examples from the rehabilitation literature. The challenges and opportunities of applying small-N designs to enhance evidence-based rehabilitation are discussed.

KW - Evaluation studies as topic

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Research design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864280749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864280749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.017

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.12.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 22580169

AN - SCOPUS:84864280749

VL - 93

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 8 SUPPL.

ER -