Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Standard clinical approaches and emerging modalities for glioblastoma imaging

  • Joshua D. Bernstock
  • , Sam E. Gary
  • , Neil Klinger
  • , Pablo A. Valdes
  • , Walid Ibn Essayed
  • , Hannah E. Olsen
  • , Gustavo Chagoya
  • , Galal Elsayed
  • , Daisuke Yamashita
  • , Patrick Schuss
  • , Florian A. Gessler
  • , Pier Paolo Peruzzi
  • , Asim K. Bag
  • , Gregory K. Friedman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary adult intracranial malignancy and carries a dismal prognosis despite an aggressive multimodal treatment regimen that consists of surgical resection, radiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Radiographic evaluation, largely informed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is a critical component of initial diagnosis, surgical planning, and post-treatment monitoring. However, conventional MRI does not provide information regarding tumor microvasculature, necrosis, or neoangiogenesis. In addition, traditional MRI imaging can be further confounded by treatment-related effects such as pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and/or pseudoresponse(s) that preclude clinicians from making fully informed decisions when structuring a therapeutic approach. A myriad of novel imaging modalities have been developed to address these deficits. Herein, we provide a clinically oriented review of standard techniques for imaging GBM and highlight emerging technologies utilized in disease characterization and therapeutic development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbervdac080
JournalNeuro-Oncology Advances
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • MRI
  • PET
  • glioblastoma (GBM)
  • mass spectrometry
  • radiographic progression
  • tumor progression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standard clinical approaches and emerging modalities for glioblastoma imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this