Statistical conclusion validity of rehabilitation research. A quantitative analysis

Kenneth Ottenbacher, K. A. Barrett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The findings of 100 data-based studies exploring the effectiveness of rehabilitation procedures were reviewed and analyzed. The statistical conclusion validity was determined by computing post hoc power coefficients for the statistical hypotheses tests included in the review studies. The data analysis revealed that the median power to detect a small effect size in the studies reviewed was 0.08. The median power to detect medium and large effect sizes was 0.26 and 0.56, respectively. The results suggest the possibility of a high rate of type II experimental errors in the rehabilitation research. A type II error represents a false-negative conclusion and occurs when a researcher supports a null hypothesis that was false and should have been rejected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume70
Issue number1 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Research Personnel
Rehabilitation Research

Keywords

  • Efficacy
  • statistical power
  • type II error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{e9cf64e5e4b74bb8ae4471cf32325d93,
title = "Statistical conclusion validity of rehabilitation research. A quantitative analysis",
abstract = "The findings of 100 data-based studies exploring the effectiveness of rehabilitation procedures were reviewed and analyzed. The statistical conclusion validity was determined by computing post hoc power coefficients for the statistical hypotheses tests included in the review studies. The data analysis revealed that the median power to detect a small effect size in the studies reviewed was 0.08. The median power to detect medium and large effect sizes was 0.26 and 0.56, respectively. The results suggest the possibility of a high rate of type II experimental errors in the rehabilitation research. A type II error represents a false-negative conclusion and occurs when a researcher supports a null hypothesis that was false and should have been rejected.",
keywords = "Efficacy, statistical power, type II error",
author = "Kenneth Ottenbacher and Barrett, {K. A.}",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical conclusion validity of rehabilitation research. A quantitative analysis

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

AU - Barrett, K. A.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The findings of 100 data-based studies exploring the effectiveness of rehabilitation procedures were reviewed and analyzed. The statistical conclusion validity was determined by computing post hoc power coefficients for the statistical hypotheses tests included in the review studies. The data analysis revealed that the median power to detect a small effect size in the studies reviewed was 0.08. The median power to detect medium and large effect sizes was 0.26 and 0.56, respectively. The results suggest the possibility of a high rate of type II experimental errors in the rehabilitation research. A type II error represents a false-negative conclusion and occurs when a researcher supports a null hypothesis that was false and should have been rejected.

AB - The findings of 100 data-based studies exploring the effectiveness of rehabilitation procedures were reviewed and analyzed. The statistical conclusion validity was determined by computing post hoc power coefficients for the statistical hypotheses tests included in the review studies. The data analysis revealed that the median power to detect a small effect size in the studies reviewed was 0.08. The median power to detect medium and large effect sizes was 0.26 and 0.56, respectively. The results suggest the possibility of a high rate of type II experimental errors in the rehabilitation research. A type II error represents a false-negative conclusion and occurs when a researcher supports a null hypothesis that was false and should have been rejected.

KW - Efficacy

KW - statistical power

KW - type II error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025976554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025976554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025976554

VL - 70

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 1 SUPPL.

ER -