Structural basis, stoichiometry, and thermodynamics of binding of the chemokines KC and MIP2 to the glycosaminoglycan heparin

Krishna Mohan Sepuru, Balaji Nagarajan, Umesh R. Desai, Krishna Rajarathnam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC or mCXCL1) and macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP2 or mCXCL2) play nonredundant roles in trafficking blood neutrophils to sites of infection and injury. The functional responses of KC and MIP2 are intimately coupled to their interactions with glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). GAG interactions orchestrate chemokine concentration gradients and modulate receptor activity, which together regulate neutrophil trafficking. Here, using NMR, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), we characterized the molecular basis of KC and MIP2 binding to the GAG heparin. Both chemokines reversibly exist as monomers and dimers, and the NMR analysis indicates that the dimer binds heparin with higher affinity. The ITC experiments indicate a stoichiometry of two GAGs per KC or MIP2 dimer and that the enthalpic and entropic contributions vary significantly between the two chemokine– heparin complexes. NMR-based structural models of heparin–KC and heparin–MIP2 complexes reveal that different combinations of residues from the N-loop, 40s turn, 3-strand, and C-terminal helix form a binding surface within a monomer and that both conserved residues and residues unique to a particular chemokine mediate the binding interactions. MD simulations indicate significant residue-specific differences in their contribution to binding and affinity for a given chemokine and between chemokines. On the basis of our observations that KC and MIP2 bind to GAG via distinct molecular interactions, we propose that the differences in these GAG interactions lead to differences in neutrophil recruitment and play nonoverlapping roles in resolution of inflammation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17817-17828
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Biological Chemistry
Volume293
Issue number46
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Glycosaminoglycans
Thermodynamics
Chemokines
Stoichiometry
Heparin
Dimers
Calorimetry
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Titration
Molecular dynamics
Neutrophils
Monomers
Chemokine CXCL2
Molecular interactions
Neutrophil Infiltration
Structural Models
Computer simulation
Blood
Inflammation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Structural basis, stoichiometry, and thermodynamics of binding of the chemokines KC and MIP2 to the glycosaminoglycan heparin. / Sepuru, Krishna Mohan; Nagarajan, Balaji; Desai, Umesh R.; Rajarathnam, Krishna.

In: Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 293, No. 46, 01.01.2018, p. 17817-17828.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a3c0096f100e4edb9f5416063dab1a33,
title = "Structural basis, stoichiometry, and thermodynamics of binding of the chemokines KC and MIP2 to the glycosaminoglycan heparin",
abstract = "Keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC or mCXCL1) and macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP2 or mCXCL2) play nonredundant roles in trafficking blood neutrophils to sites of infection and injury. The functional responses of KC and MIP2 are intimately coupled to their interactions with glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). GAG interactions orchestrate chemokine concentration gradients and modulate receptor activity, which together regulate neutrophil trafficking. Here, using NMR, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), we characterized the molecular basis of KC and MIP2 binding to the GAG heparin. Both chemokines reversibly exist as monomers and dimers, and the NMR analysis indicates that the dimer binds heparin with higher affinity. The ITC experiments indicate a stoichiometry of two GAGs per KC or MIP2 dimer and that the enthalpic and entropic contributions vary significantly between the two chemokine– heparin complexes. NMR-based structural models of heparin–KC and heparin–MIP2 complexes reveal that different combinations of residues from the N-loop, 40s turn, 3-strand, and C-terminal helix form a binding surface within a monomer and that both conserved residues and residues unique to a particular chemokine mediate the binding interactions. MD simulations indicate significant residue-specific differences in their contribution to binding and affinity for a given chemokine and between chemokines. On the basis of our observations that KC and MIP2 bind to GAG via distinct molecular interactions, we propose that the differences in these GAG interactions lead to differences in neutrophil recruitment and play nonoverlapping roles in resolution of inflammation.",
author = "Sepuru, {Krishna Mohan} and Balaji Nagarajan and Desai, {Umesh R.} and Krishna Rajarathnam",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1074/jbc.RA118.004866",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "293",
pages = "17817--17828",
journal = "Journal of Biological Chemistry",
issn = "0021-9258",
publisher = "American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Inc.",
number = "46",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural basis, stoichiometry, and thermodynamics of binding of the chemokines KC and MIP2 to the glycosaminoglycan heparin

AU - Sepuru, Krishna Mohan

AU - Nagarajan, Balaji

AU - Desai, Umesh R.

AU - Rajarathnam, Krishna

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC or mCXCL1) and macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP2 or mCXCL2) play nonredundant roles in trafficking blood neutrophils to sites of infection and injury. The functional responses of KC and MIP2 are intimately coupled to their interactions with glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). GAG interactions orchestrate chemokine concentration gradients and modulate receptor activity, which together regulate neutrophil trafficking. Here, using NMR, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), we characterized the molecular basis of KC and MIP2 binding to the GAG heparin. Both chemokines reversibly exist as monomers and dimers, and the NMR analysis indicates that the dimer binds heparin with higher affinity. The ITC experiments indicate a stoichiometry of two GAGs per KC or MIP2 dimer and that the enthalpic and entropic contributions vary significantly between the two chemokine– heparin complexes. NMR-based structural models of heparin–KC and heparin–MIP2 complexes reveal that different combinations of residues from the N-loop, 40s turn, 3-strand, and C-terminal helix form a binding surface within a monomer and that both conserved residues and residues unique to a particular chemokine mediate the binding interactions. MD simulations indicate significant residue-specific differences in their contribution to binding and affinity for a given chemokine and between chemokines. On the basis of our observations that KC and MIP2 bind to GAG via distinct molecular interactions, we propose that the differences in these GAG interactions lead to differences in neutrophil recruitment and play nonoverlapping roles in resolution of inflammation.

AB - Keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC or mCXCL1) and macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP2 or mCXCL2) play nonredundant roles in trafficking blood neutrophils to sites of infection and injury. The functional responses of KC and MIP2 are intimately coupled to their interactions with glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). GAG interactions orchestrate chemokine concentration gradients and modulate receptor activity, which together regulate neutrophil trafficking. Here, using NMR, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), we characterized the molecular basis of KC and MIP2 binding to the GAG heparin. Both chemokines reversibly exist as monomers and dimers, and the NMR analysis indicates that the dimer binds heparin with higher affinity. The ITC experiments indicate a stoichiometry of two GAGs per KC or MIP2 dimer and that the enthalpic and entropic contributions vary significantly between the two chemokine– heparin complexes. NMR-based structural models of heparin–KC and heparin–MIP2 complexes reveal that different combinations of residues from the N-loop, 40s turn, 3-strand, and C-terminal helix form a binding surface within a monomer and that both conserved residues and residues unique to a particular chemokine mediate the binding interactions. MD simulations indicate significant residue-specific differences in their contribution to binding and affinity for a given chemokine and between chemokines. On the basis of our observations that KC and MIP2 bind to GAG via distinct molecular interactions, we propose that the differences in these GAG interactions lead to differences in neutrophil recruitment and play nonoverlapping roles in resolution of inflammation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056586368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056586368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004866

DO - 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004866

M3 - Article

C2 - 30257866

AN - SCOPUS:85056586368

VL - 293

SP - 17817

EP - 17828

JO - Journal of Biological Chemistry

JF - Journal of Biological Chemistry

SN - 0021-9258

IS - 46

ER -