Study design, statistical method, and level of evidence in Japanese and American clinical journals

Tsuguya Fukui, Mahbubur Rahman, Miho Sekimoto, Kenji Hira, Kenji Maeda, Takeshi Morimoto, Masashi Goto, Hidehiko Suzuki, Takuro Shimbo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical articles published in Japanese journals are said to be characterized by poor study design, less sophisticated statistics, and producing few high-grade clinical evidences. Two American and two Japanese medical journals, published in 1990, 1993, 1996, and 1999 were compared to find out the differences regarding study design, statistical methods, and level of clinical evidence of original articles and synthetic studies. There were 1689 original articles in American and 308 in Japanese journals. Regarding study design, American articles contributed much more to randomized controlled trials/controlled trials/clinical trials (27.9% vs. 14.3%, p=0.001), cohort studies (21.6% vs. 6.2%, p=0.001), and case-control studies (6.5% vs. 0.3%, p=0.000). Among original articles in American and Japanese journals, mean number of statistical methods used were 2.4 and 1.7 per article (p=0.000), respectively. Articles providing high grade clinical evidence (grade Ia, Ib & IIa) were much greater in proportion in American journals than Japanese journals (31.1% vs. 12.7%, p=0.001). The overall picture of Japanese medical articles seems to be improving recently, at least in terms of statistical methods toward more diversified and sophisticated way of use, compared to the previous data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-270
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Epidemiology
Volume12
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Asian Americans
Case-Control Studies
Cohort Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • Japan
  • Medical journals
  • Statistical procedures
  • Study design
  • USA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Fukui, T., Rahman, M., Sekimoto, M., Hira, K., Maeda, K., Morimoto, T., ... Shimbo, T. (2002). Study design, statistical method, and level of evidence in Japanese and American clinical journals. Journal of Epidemiology, 12(3), 266-270.

Study design, statistical method, and level of evidence in Japanese and American clinical journals. / Fukui, Tsuguya; Rahman, Mahbubur; Sekimoto, Miho; Hira, Kenji; Maeda, Kenji; Morimoto, Takeshi; Goto, Masashi; Suzuki, Hidehiko; Shimbo, Takuro.

In: Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 05.2002, p. 266-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fukui, T, Rahman, M, Sekimoto, M, Hira, K, Maeda, K, Morimoto, T, Goto, M, Suzuki, H & Shimbo, T 2002, 'Study design, statistical method, and level of evidence in Japanese and American clinical journals', Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266-270.
Fukui T, Rahman M, Sekimoto M, Hira K, Maeda K, Morimoto T et al. Study design, statistical method, and level of evidence in Japanese and American clinical journals. Journal of Epidemiology. 2002 May;12(3):266-270.
Fukui, Tsuguya ; Rahman, Mahbubur ; Sekimoto, Miho ; Hira, Kenji ; Maeda, Kenji ; Morimoto, Takeshi ; Goto, Masashi ; Suzuki, Hidehiko ; Shimbo, Takuro. / Study design, statistical method, and level of evidence in Japanese and American clinical journals. In: Journal of Epidemiology. 2002 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 266-270.
@article{1951c47f2d414cc794876e461077bb0a,
title = "Study design, statistical method, and level of evidence in Japanese and American clinical journals",
abstract = "Clinical articles published in Japanese journals are said to be characterized by poor study design, less sophisticated statistics, and producing few high-grade clinical evidences. Two American and two Japanese medical journals, published in 1990, 1993, 1996, and 1999 were compared to find out the differences regarding study design, statistical methods, and level of clinical evidence of original articles and synthetic studies. There were 1689 original articles in American and 308 in Japanese journals. Regarding study design, American articles contributed much more to randomized controlled trials/controlled trials/clinical trials (27.9{\%} vs. 14.3{\%}, p=0.001), cohort studies (21.6{\%} vs. 6.2{\%}, p=0.001), and case-control studies (6.5{\%} vs. 0.3{\%}, p=0.000). Among original articles in American and Japanese journals, mean number of statistical methods used were 2.4 and 1.7 per article (p=0.000), respectively. Articles providing high grade clinical evidence (grade Ia, Ib & IIa) were much greater in proportion in American journals than Japanese journals (31.1{\%} vs. 12.7{\%}, p=0.001). The overall picture of Japanese medical articles seems to be improving recently, at least in terms of statistical methods toward more diversified and sophisticated way of use, compared to the previous data.",
keywords = "Japan, Medical journals, Statistical procedures, Study design, USA",
author = "Tsuguya Fukui and Mahbubur Rahman and Miho Sekimoto and Kenji Hira and Kenji Maeda and Takeshi Morimoto and Masashi Goto and Hidehiko Suzuki and Takuro Shimbo",
year = "2002",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "266--270",
journal = "Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0917-5040",
publisher = "Japan Epidemiology Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Study design, statistical method, and level of evidence in Japanese and American clinical journals

AU - Fukui, Tsuguya

AU - Rahman, Mahbubur

AU - Sekimoto, Miho

AU - Hira, Kenji

AU - Maeda, Kenji

AU - Morimoto, Takeshi

AU - Goto, Masashi

AU - Suzuki, Hidehiko

AU - Shimbo, Takuro

PY - 2002/5

Y1 - 2002/5

N2 - Clinical articles published in Japanese journals are said to be characterized by poor study design, less sophisticated statistics, and producing few high-grade clinical evidences. Two American and two Japanese medical journals, published in 1990, 1993, 1996, and 1999 were compared to find out the differences regarding study design, statistical methods, and level of clinical evidence of original articles and synthetic studies. There were 1689 original articles in American and 308 in Japanese journals. Regarding study design, American articles contributed much more to randomized controlled trials/controlled trials/clinical trials (27.9% vs. 14.3%, p=0.001), cohort studies (21.6% vs. 6.2%, p=0.001), and case-control studies (6.5% vs. 0.3%, p=0.000). Among original articles in American and Japanese journals, mean number of statistical methods used were 2.4 and 1.7 per article (p=0.000), respectively. Articles providing high grade clinical evidence (grade Ia, Ib & IIa) were much greater in proportion in American journals than Japanese journals (31.1% vs. 12.7%, p=0.001). The overall picture of Japanese medical articles seems to be improving recently, at least in terms of statistical methods toward more diversified and sophisticated way of use, compared to the previous data.

AB - Clinical articles published in Japanese journals are said to be characterized by poor study design, less sophisticated statistics, and producing few high-grade clinical evidences. Two American and two Japanese medical journals, published in 1990, 1993, 1996, and 1999 were compared to find out the differences regarding study design, statistical methods, and level of clinical evidence of original articles and synthetic studies. There were 1689 original articles in American and 308 in Japanese journals. Regarding study design, American articles contributed much more to randomized controlled trials/controlled trials/clinical trials (27.9% vs. 14.3%, p=0.001), cohort studies (21.6% vs. 6.2%, p=0.001), and case-control studies (6.5% vs. 0.3%, p=0.000). Among original articles in American and Japanese journals, mean number of statistical methods used were 2.4 and 1.7 per article (p=0.000), respectively. Articles providing high grade clinical evidence (grade Ia, Ib & IIa) were much greater in proportion in American journals than Japanese journals (31.1% vs. 12.7%, p=0.001). The overall picture of Japanese medical articles seems to be improving recently, at least in terms of statistical methods toward more diversified and sophisticated way of use, compared to the previous data.

KW - Japan

KW - Medical journals

KW - Statistical procedures

KW - Study design

KW - USA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036560070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036560070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 266

EP - 270

JO - Journal of Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0917-5040

IS - 3

ER -