TY - JOUR
T1 - Subcutaneous analgesic system versus epidural for post-operative pain control in surgical pediatric oncology patients
AU - Johnson, Brittany L.
AU - Todd, Hannah F.
AU - Vasudevan, Sanjeev A.
AU - Nuchtern, Jed G.
AU - Patel, Nihar V.
AU - Naik-Mathuria, Bindi J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Background/Purpose: Pediatric oncology patients often undergo open operations for tumor resection, and epidural catheters are commonly utilized for pain control. Our purpose was to evaluate whether a subcutaneous analgesic system (SAS) provides equivalent post-operative pain control. Methods: An IRB approved, retrospective chart review of children age < 18 undergoing open abdominal, pelvic or thoracic surgery for tumor resection between 2017 and 2019 who received either epidural or SAS for post-operative pain control was performed. Comparisons of morphine milligram equivalents (MME), pain scores, and post-operative course were made using parametric and non-parametric analyses. Results: Of 101 patients, median age was 7 years (2 months–17.9 years). There were 65 epidural and 36 SAS patients. Transverse laparotomy was the most common incision (41%), followed by thoracotomy (29%). Pain scores, MME, urinary catheter days, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) were similar between the two groups. Urinary catheter use was more common in epidural patients (70% vs 30%, p = < 0.001). SAS patients had faster time to ambulation and time to regular diet by 1 day (p = 0.02). Epidural patients more commonly had a complication with the pain device (20% vs 3%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to be discharged with narcotics (60% vs. 40%, p = 0.04). Charges associated with the hospital stay were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: In pediatric oncology patients undergoing open abdominal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery, SAS may provide similar pain control to epidural, but with faster post-operative recovery, fewer complications, and less discharge narcotic use. A prospective study is needed to validate these results.
AB - Background/Purpose: Pediatric oncology patients often undergo open operations for tumor resection, and epidural catheters are commonly utilized for pain control. Our purpose was to evaluate whether a subcutaneous analgesic system (SAS) provides equivalent post-operative pain control. Methods: An IRB approved, retrospective chart review of children age < 18 undergoing open abdominal, pelvic or thoracic surgery for tumor resection between 2017 and 2019 who received either epidural or SAS for post-operative pain control was performed. Comparisons of morphine milligram equivalents (MME), pain scores, and post-operative course were made using parametric and non-parametric analyses. Results: Of 101 patients, median age was 7 years (2 months–17.9 years). There were 65 epidural and 36 SAS patients. Transverse laparotomy was the most common incision (41%), followed by thoracotomy (29%). Pain scores, MME, urinary catheter days, and post-operative length of stay (LOS) were similar between the two groups. Urinary catheter use was more common in epidural patients (70% vs 30%, p = < 0.001). SAS patients had faster time to ambulation and time to regular diet by 1 day (p = 0.02). Epidural patients more commonly had a complication with the pain device (20% vs 3%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to be discharged with narcotics (60% vs. 40%, p = 0.04). Charges associated with the hospital stay were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: In pediatric oncology patients undergoing open abdominal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery, SAS may provide similar pain control to epidural, but with faster post-operative recovery, fewer complications, and less discharge narcotic use. A prospective study is needed to validate these results.
KW - Epidural
KW - Post-operative pain control
KW - Subcutaneous analgesic system
KW - Surgical oncology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095441505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095441505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.041
DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.09.041
M3 - Article
C2 - 33139029
AN - SCOPUS:85095441505
SN - 0022-3468
VL - 56
SP - 104
EP - 109
JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery
JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery
IS - 1
ER -