Substrate recognition by a family of uracil-DNA glycosylases: UNG, MUG, and TDG

Pingfang Liu, Artur Burdzy, Lawrence C. Sowers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations


In response to continuous hydrolytic and oxidative DNA damage, cells of all organisms have a complex network of repair systems that recognize, remove, and rebuild the injured sites. Damaged pyrimidines are generally removed by glycosylases that must scan the entire genome to locate lesions with sufficient fidelity to selectively remove the damage without inadvertent removal of normal bases. We report here studies conducted with a series of base analogues designed to test mechanisms of base recognition suggested by structural studies of glycosylase complexes. The oligonucleotide series examined here includes 5-halouracils with increasing substituent size and purine analogues placed opposite the target uracil with hydrogen, amino, and keto substituents in the 2- and 6-positions. The glycosylases studied here include Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG), E. coli mismatch uracil-DNA glycosylase (MUG), and the Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum mismatch thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG). The results of this study suggest that these glycosylases utilize several strategies for base identification, including (1) steric limitations on the size of the 5-substituent, (2) electronic-inductive properties of the 5-substituent, (3) reduced thermal stability of mispairs, and (4) specific functional groups on the purine base in the opposing strand. Contrary to predictions based upon the crystal structure, the preference of MUG for mispaired uracil over thymine is not based upon steric exclusion. Furthermore, the preference for mispaired uracil over uracil paired with adenine is more likely due to reduced thermal stability as opposed to specific recognition of the mispaired guanine. On the other hand, TDG, which exhibits modest discrimination among various pyrimidines, shows strong interactions with functional groups present on the purine opposite the target pyrimidine. These results provide new insights into the mechanisms of base selection by DNA repair glycosylases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1001-1009
Number of pages9
JournalChemical Research in Toxicology
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology


Dive into the research topics of 'Substrate recognition by a family of uracil-DNA glycosylases: UNG, MUG, and TDG'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this