TY - JOUR
T1 - Successes and complications of the baha system
AU - Wazen, Jack J.
AU - Young, Dayton L.
AU - Farrugia, Matthew C.
AU - Chandrasekhar, Sujana S.
AU - Ghossaini, Soha N.
AU - Borik, Julia
AU - Soneru, Christian
AU - Spitzer, Jaclyn B.
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - Objective: To determine the incidence and type of complications, as well as patient satisfaction, associated with the Baha system. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: The Silverstein Institute, Sarasota, Florida, and the Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. Patients: Patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss and single-sided deafness implanted with the Baha system between June 1998 and December 2007. Intervention: Implantation with the Baha system. Main Outcome Measure: Incidence and type of complications associated with Baha implantation and patient satisfaction as measured by a questionnaire administered on site or by telephone. Results: In our series of 218 patients (223 ears), there were no major complications. Of these patients, 4.5% required revision surgery for soft tissue complications and 1.3% needed revision for failure of osseointegration. Eight percent (8%) required local care and resolved within 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. Five percent (5%) required in office procedures. One hundred six (106) patients satisfactorily completed the survey questionnaire. Ninety-two percent (92%) reported using the device regularly and 77% were happy with the device. On average, patients reported using the device 10.1 h/d, 5.6 d/wk. Conclusion: The Baha system is safe and effective in the rehabilitation of patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses and with single-sided deafness. The high success rate, patient satisfaction rate, and predictable auditory outcome place the Baha among the leading choices for auditory rehabilitation.
AB - Objective: To determine the incidence and type of complications, as well as patient satisfaction, associated with the Baha system. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: The Silverstein Institute, Sarasota, Florida, and the Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. Patients: Patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss and single-sided deafness implanted with the Baha system between June 1998 and December 2007. Intervention: Implantation with the Baha system. Main Outcome Measure: Incidence and type of complications associated with Baha implantation and patient satisfaction as measured by a questionnaire administered on site or by telephone. Results: In our series of 218 patients (223 ears), there were no major complications. Of these patients, 4.5% required revision surgery for soft tissue complications and 1.3% needed revision for failure of osseointegration. Eight percent (8%) required local care and resolved within 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. Five percent (5%) required in office procedures. One hundred six (106) patients satisfactorily completed the survey questionnaire. Ninety-two percent (92%) reported using the device regularly and 77% were happy with the device. On average, patients reported using the device 10.1 h/d, 5.6 d/wk. Conclusion: The Baha system is safe and effective in the rehabilitation of patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses and with single-sided deafness. The high success rate, patient satisfaction rate, and predictable auditory outcome place the Baha among the leading choices for auditory rehabilitation.
KW - Complication
KW - Patient satisfaction
KW - Soft tissue
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59849116970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59849116970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318187e186
DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318187e186
M3 - Review article
C2 - 18833013
AN - SCOPUS:59849116970
SN - 1531-7129
VL - 29
SP - 1115
EP - 1119
JO - Otology and Neurotology
JF - Otology and Neurotology
IS - 8
ER -