Successes and complications of the baha system

Jack J. Wazen, Dayton Young, Matthew C. Farrugia, Sujana S. Chandrasekhar, Soha N. Ghossaini, Julia Borik, Christian Soneru, Jaclyn B. Spitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence and type of complications, as well as patient satisfaction, associated with the Baha system. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: The Silverstein Institute, Sarasota, Florida, and the Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. Patients: Patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss and single-sided deafness implanted with the Baha system between June 1998 and December 2007. Intervention: Implantation with the Baha system. Main Outcome Measure: Incidence and type of complications associated with Baha implantation and patient satisfaction as measured by a questionnaire administered on site or by telephone. Results: In our series of 218 patients (223 ears), there were no major complications. Of these patients, 4.5% required revision surgery for soft tissue complications and 1.3% needed revision for failure of osseointegration. Eight percent (8%) required local care and resolved within 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. Five percent (5%) required in office procedures. One hundred six (106) patients satisfactorily completed the survey questionnaire. Ninety-two percent (92%) reported using the device regularly and 77% were happy with the device. On average, patients reported using the device 10.1 h/d, 5.6 d/wk. Conclusion: The Baha system is safe and effective in the rehabilitation of patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses and with single-sided deafness. The high success rate, patient satisfaction rate, and predictable auditory outcome place the Baha among the leading choices for auditory rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1115-1119
Number of pages5
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Patient Satisfaction
Conductive Hearing Loss
Deafness
Equipment and Supplies
Rehabilitation
Osseointegration
Incidence
Reoperation
Telephone
Ear
Retrospective Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Complication
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Soft tissue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wazen, J. J., Young, D., Farrugia, M. C., Chandrasekhar, S. S., Ghossaini, S. N., Borik, J., ... Spitzer, J. B. (2008). Successes and complications of the baha system. Otology and Neurotology, 29(8), 1115-1119. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318187e186

Successes and complications of the baha system. / Wazen, Jack J.; Young, Dayton; Farrugia, Matthew C.; Chandrasekhar, Sujana S.; Ghossaini, Soha N.; Borik, Julia; Soneru, Christian; Spitzer, Jaclyn B.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 29, No. 8, 12.2008, p. 1115-1119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wazen, JJ, Young, D, Farrugia, MC, Chandrasekhar, SS, Ghossaini, SN, Borik, J, Soneru, C & Spitzer, JB 2008, 'Successes and complications of the baha system', Otology and Neurotology, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1115-1119. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318187e186
Wazen JJ, Young D, Farrugia MC, Chandrasekhar SS, Ghossaini SN, Borik J et al. Successes and complications of the baha system. Otology and Neurotology. 2008 Dec;29(8):1115-1119. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e318187e186
Wazen, Jack J. ; Young, Dayton ; Farrugia, Matthew C. ; Chandrasekhar, Sujana S. ; Ghossaini, Soha N. ; Borik, Julia ; Soneru, Christian ; Spitzer, Jaclyn B. / Successes and complications of the baha system. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2008 ; Vol. 29, No. 8. pp. 1115-1119.
@article{b9df3783757d4cafa0f64a5479a59c30,
title = "Successes and complications of the baha system",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the incidence and type of complications, as well as patient satisfaction, associated with the Baha system. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: The Silverstein Institute, Sarasota, Florida, and the Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. Patients: Patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss and single-sided deafness implanted with the Baha system between June 1998 and December 2007. Intervention: Implantation with the Baha system. Main Outcome Measure: Incidence and type of complications associated with Baha implantation and patient satisfaction as measured by a questionnaire administered on site or by telephone. Results: In our series of 218 patients (223 ears), there were no major complications. Of these patients, 4.5{\%} required revision surgery for soft tissue complications and 1.3{\%} needed revision for failure of osseointegration. Eight percent (8{\%}) required local care and resolved within 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. Five percent (5{\%}) required in office procedures. One hundred six (106) patients satisfactorily completed the survey questionnaire. Ninety-two percent (92{\%}) reported using the device regularly and 77{\%} were happy with the device. On average, patients reported using the device 10.1 h/d, 5.6 d/wk. Conclusion: The Baha system is safe and effective in the rehabilitation of patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses and with single-sided deafness. The high success rate, patient satisfaction rate, and predictable auditory outcome place the Baha among the leading choices for auditory rehabilitation.",
keywords = "Complication, Patient satisfaction, Soft tissue",
author = "Wazen, {Jack J.} and Dayton Young and Farrugia, {Matthew C.} and Chandrasekhar, {Sujana S.} and Ghossaini, {Soha N.} and Julia Borik and Christian Soneru and Spitzer, {Jaclyn B.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0b013e318187e186",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1115--1119",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Successes and complications of the baha system

AU - Wazen, Jack J.

AU - Young, Dayton

AU - Farrugia, Matthew C.

AU - Chandrasekhar, Sujana S.

AU - Ghossaini, Soha N.

AU - Borik, Julia

AU - Soneru, Christian

AU - Spitzer, Jaclyn B.

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Objective: To determine the incidence and type of complications, as well as patient satisfaction, associated with the Baha system. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: The Silverstein Institute, Sarasota, Florida, and the Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. Patients: Patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss and single-sided deafness implanted with the Baha system between June 1998 and December 2007. Intervention: Implantation with the Baha system. Main Outcome Measure: Incidence and type of complications associated with Baha implantation and patient satisfaction as measured by a questionnaire administered on site or by telephone. Results: In our series of 218 patients (223 ears), there were no major complications. Of these patients, 4.5% required revision surgery for soft tissue complications and 1.3% needed revision for failure of osseointegration. Eight percent (8%) required local care and resolved within 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. Five percent (5%) required in office procedures. One hundred six (106) patients satisfactorily completed the survey questionnaire. Ninety-two percent (92%) reported using the device regularly and 77% were happy with the device. On average, patients reported using the device 10.1 h/d, 5.6 d/wk. Conclusion: The Baha system is safe and effective in the rehabilitation of patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses and with single-sided deafness. The high success rate, patient satisfaction rate, and predictable auditory outcome place the Baha among the leading choices for auditory rehabilitation.

AB - Objective: To determine the incidence and type of complications, as well as patient satisfaction, associated with the Baha system. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: The Silverstein Institute, Sarasota, Florida, and the Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. Patients: Patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss and single-sided deafness implanted with the Baha system between June 1998 and December 2007. Intervention: Implantation with the Baha system. Main Outcome Measure: Incidence and type of complications associated with Baha implantation and patient satisfaction as measured by a questionnaire administered on site or by telephone. Results: In our series of 218 patients (223 ears), there were no major complications. Of these patients, 4.5% required revision surgery for soft tissue complications and 1.3% needed revision for failure of osseointegration. Eight percent (8%) required local care and resolved within 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. Five percent (5%) required in office procedures. One hundred six (106) patients satisfactorily completed the survey questionnaire. Ninety-two percent (92%) reported using the device regularly and 77% were happy with the device. On average, patients reported using the device 10.1 h/d, 5.6 d/wk. Conclusion: The Baha system is safe and effective in the rehabilitation of patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses and with single-sided deafness. The high success rate, patient satisfaction rate, and predictable auditory outcome place the Baha among the leading choices for auditory rehabilitation.

KW - Complication

KW - Patient satisfaction

KW - Soft tissue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59849116970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59849116970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318187e186

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318187e186

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 1115

EP - 1119

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 8

ER -