Surgical approach and long-term clinical outcome in women with microinvasive cervical cancer

  • Francesco Sopracordevole
  • , Giuseppe Chiossi
  • , Maggiorino Barbero
  • , Paolo Cristoforoni
  • , Bruno Ghiringhello
  • , Antonio Frega
  • , Francesca Tortolani
  • , Fausto Boselli
  • , Nicolò Clemente
  • , Andrea Ciavattini
  • , SOCIETY OF COLPOSCOPY ITALIAN SOCIETY OF COLPOSCOPY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of conservative surgical approach for microinvasive cervical cancer with regards to cone margins status and lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI). Patients and Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 153 women diagnosed with microinvasive cervical cancer over a 10 years period (1993-2003). Results: In conservatively-treated women (n=80), neither cancer mortality nor disease relapse after 184.5±20.5 months of follow-up was detected. Residual disease in women who underwent secondary surgery was significantly related to positive margins on the primary cone excision (p=0.005) while no correlation with LVSI emerged. Conclusion: Conization can represent the definitive treatment for stage IA1, if surgical margins are cancer-free, independently of LVSI. A conservative surgical approach could also be considered in women with IA2 cervical cancer when preservation of fertility is strongly requested. A close long-term surveillance should be scheduled for conservatively-treated women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4345-4350
Number of pages6
JournalAnticancer Research
Volume34
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cone margins
  • Conization
  • Lymph vascular space invasion
  • Microinvasive cervical cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical approach and long-term clinical outcome in women with microinvasive cervical cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this