Surgical technique for removal of tined lead for InterStim

Zhamshid Okhunov, Bilal Farhan, Ahmed Ahmed, Christopher Pulford, Gamal Ghoniem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to introduce our technique describing the removal of a chronic implanted tined-lead in patients with a sacral neuromodulator implant. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who had chronic sacral neuromodulator (InterStim) implanted by a single surgeon from 2001 through 2015. This simple surgical technique was developed and successfully performed to remove the leads. Primary reasons for removal were elective due to poor symptoms control and failure to maintain response or lead migration. Patient demographics, indication for implantation, as well as installation and removal complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: Twenty-five patients were included [mean age: 60.4 years (32-86), 17 females]. Primary indications for sacral nerve stimulation were overactive bladder in 16 (64%), mixed incontinence in 6 (24%), urinary retention in 2 (8%), and interstitial cystitis 3 (12%). Mean implant duration was 24.2 (0.5-90) months. The existing tined lead was removed and replaced in 11 (44%) patients while the remaining 14 (56%) underwent complete removal of the unit without subsequent replacement. Successful lead removal without complications was achieved in 24 (96%) patients. Conclusions: This minimally invasive technique is a simple, safe, and effective method of removing chronic implanted tined leads en bloc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8918-8920
Number of pages3
JournalCanadian Journal of Urology
Volume24
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neurotransmitter Agents
Interstitial Cystitis
Overactive Urinary Bladder
Urinary Retention
Lead
Demography
Surgeons

Keywords

  • InterStim
  • Interstitial cystitis
  • Mixed incontinence
  • Overactive bladder
  • Removal
  • Sacral neuromodulation implant
  • Tined lead
  • Urinary retention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Okhunov, Z., Farhan, B., Ahmed, A., Pulford, C., & Ghoniem, G. (2017). Surgical technique for removal of tined lead for InterStim. Canadian Journal of Urology, 24(4), 8918-8920.

Surgical technique for removal of tined lead for InterStim. / Okhunov, Zhamshid; Farhan, Bilal; Ahmed, Ahmed; Pulford, Christopher; Ghoniem, Gamal.

In: Canadian Journal of Urology, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 8918-8920.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Okhunov, Z, Farhan, B, Ahmed, A, Pulford, C & Ghoniem, G 2017, 'Surgical technique for removal of tined lead for InterStim', Canadian Journal of Urology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 8918-8920.
Okhunov Z, Farhan B, Ahmed A, Pulford C, Ghoniem G. Surgical technique for removal of tined lead for InterStim. Canadian Journal of Urology. 2017 Aug 1;24(4):8918-8920.
Okhunov, Zhamshid ; Farhan, Bilal ; Ahmed, Ahmed ; Pulford, Christopher ; Ghoniem, Gamal. / Surgical technique for removal of tined lead for InterStim. In: Canadian Journal of Urology. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 8918-8920.
@article{33348a5f2eb84780a67c936801e8ffcb,
title = "Surgical technique for removal of tined lead for InterStim",
abstract = "Introduction: We aimed to introduce our technique describing the removal of a chronic implanted tined-lead in patients with a sacral neuromodulator implant. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who had chronic sacral neuromodulator (InterStim) implanted by a single surgeon from 2001 through 2015. This simple surgical technique was developed and successfully performed to remove the leads. Primary reasons for removal were elective due to poor symptoms control and failure to maintain response or lead migration. Patient demographics, indication for implantation, as well as installation and removal complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: Twenty-five patients were included [mean age: 60.4 years (32-86), 17 females]. Primary indications for sacral nerve stimulation were overactive bladder in 16 (64{\%}), mixed incontinence in 6 (24{\%}), urinary retention in 2 (8{\%}), and interstitial cystitis 3 (12{\%}). Mean implant duration was 24.2 (0.5-90) months. The existing tined lead was removed and replaced in 11 (44{\%}) patients while the remaining 14 (56{\%}) underwent complete removal of the unit without subsequent replacement. Successful lead removal without complications was achieved in 24 (96{\%}) patients. Conclusions: This minimally invasive technique is a simple, safe, and effective method of removing chronic implanted tined leads en bloc.",
keywords = "InterStim, Interstitial cystitis, Mixed incontinence, Overactive bladder, Removal, Sacral neuromodulation implant, Tined lead, Urinary retention",
author = "Zhamshid Okhunov and Bilal Farhan and Ahmed Ahmed and Christopher Pulford and Gamal Ghoniem",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "8918--8920",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Urology",
issn = "1195-9479",
publisher = "Canadian Journal of Urology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical technique for removal of tined lead for InterStim

AU - Okhunov, Zhamshid

AU - Farhan, Bilal

AU - Ahmed, Ahmed

AU - Pulford, Christopher

AU - Ghoniem, Gamal

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Introduction: We aimed to introduce our technique describing the removal of a chronic implanted tined-lead in patients with a sacral neuromodulator implant. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who had chronic sacral neuromodulator (InterStim) implanted by a single surgeon from 2001 through 2015. This simple surgical technique was developed and successfully performed to remove the leads. Primary reasons for removal were elective due to poor symptoms control and failure to maintain response or lead migration. Patient demographics, indication for implantation, as well as installation and removal complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: Twenty-five patients were included [mean age: 60.4 years (32-86), 17 females]. Primary indications for sacral nerve stimulation were overactive bladder in 16 (64%), mixed incontinence in 6 (24%), urinary retention in 2 (8%), and interstitial cystitis 3 (12%). Mean implant duration was 24.2 (0.5-90) months. The existing tined lead was removed and replaced in 11 (44%) patients while the remaining 14 (56%) underwent complete removal of the unit without subsequent replacement. Successful lead removal without complications was achieved in 24 (96%) patients. Conclusions: This minimally invasive technique is a simple, safe, and effective method of removing chronic implanted tined leads en bloc.

AB - Introduction: We aimed to introduce our technique describing the removal of a chronic implanted tined-lead in patients with a sacral neuromodulator implant. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who had chronic sacral neuromodulator (InterStim) implanted by a single surgeon from 2001 through 2015. This simple surgical technique was developed and successfully performed to remove the leads. Primary reasons for removal were elective due to poor symptoms control and failure to maintain response or lead migration. Patient demographics, indication for implantation, as well as installation and removal complications were recorded and analyzed. Results: Twenty-five patients were included [mean age: 60.4 years (32-86), 17 females]. Primary indications for sacral nerve stimulation were overactive bladder in 16 (64%), mixed incontinence in 6 (24%), urinary retention in 2 (8%), and interstitial cystitis 3 (12%). Mean implant duration was 24.2 (0.5-90) months. The existing tined lead was removed and replaced in 11 (44%) patients while the remaining 14 (56%) underwent complete removal of the unit without subsequent replacement. Successful lead removal without complications was achieved in 24 (96%) patients. Conclusions: This minimally invasive technique is a simple, safe, and effective method of removing chronic implanted tined leads en bloc.

KW - InterStim

KW - Interstitial cystitis

KW - Mixed incontinence

KW - Overactive bladder

KW - Removal

KW - Sacral neuromodulation implant

KW - Tined lead

KW - Urinary retention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027970503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027970503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 28832311

AN - SCOPUS:85027970503

VL - 24

SP - 8918

EP - 8920

JO - Canadian Journal of Urology

JF - Canadian Journal of Urology

SN - 1195-9479

IS - 4

ER -