Surgically placed gastro-jejunostomy tubes have fewer complications compared to feeding jejunostomy tubes

Dennis Gore, Mark DeLegge, Alfred Gervin, Eric J. DeMaria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: During laparotomy, jejunostomy tubes (J tubes) are often placed to provide access for enteral nutrition in the immediate postoperative period. However, the placement of such tubes may be associated with potentially devastating intra-abdominal complications possibly related to the tenuous security of a tube through the small bowel wall. An alternative method for enteral nutrition access is to surgically place a 'PEG-J' tube (i.e., surgical G/J tube) thus providing for jejunal feedings via a gastrotomy without a jejunotomy. The purpose of this study is to assess whether surgically placed G/J tubes reduce the postoperative complications in comparison to feeding J tubes. Methods: Over the past 18 months, 92 J tubes and 56 G/J tubes were placed during laparotomy at a single institution and the method chosen by surgeons' preference. The frequency of complications associated with each tube was determined by review of the postoperative medical records. Results: There was no enteric leakage in those patient given G/J tubes (p < 0.05). Furthermore 10% of the patients receiving J tubes required operative repair of a J tube complication while no patient with an access complication following G/J tube placement required surgical repair (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that operative positioning of a jejunal feeding tube through a gastrostomy tube (surgical G/J tube) provides a safer route for enteral nutrition than does direct tube placement via the jejunal wall, by significantly reducing both the incidence of enteric leakage and the requirement for operative repair.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-146
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of the American College of Nutrition
Volume15
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Jejunostomy
tube feeding
enteral feeding
Enteral Nutrition
laparotomy
postoperative complications
surgeons
methodology
incidence
Laparotomy
Gastrostomy
Postoperative Period
Medical Records

Keywords

  • enteral nutrition access
  • gastro-jejunostomy tubes
  • jejunostomy tubes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Food Science

Cite this

Surgically placed gastro-jejunostomy tubes have fewer complications compared to feeding jejunostomy tubes. / Gore, Dennis; DeLegge, Mark; Gervin, Alfred; DeMaria, Eric J.

In: Journal of the American College of Nutrition, Vol. 15, No. 2, 04.1996, p. 144-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8283a0c08a054ea3ad67cc4f6efb0872,
title = "Surgically placed gastro-jejunostomy tubes have fewer complications compared to feeding jejunostomy tubes",
abstract = "Objective: During laparotomy, jejunostomy tubes (J tubes) are often placed to provide access for enteral nutrition in the immediate postoperative period. However, the placement of such tubes may be associated with potentially devastating intra-abdominal complications possibly related to the tenuous security of a tube through the small bowel wall. An alternative method for enteral nutrition access is to surgically place a 'PEG-J' tube (i.e., surgical G/J tube) thus providing for jejunal feedings via a gastrotomy without a jejunotomy. The purpose of this study is to assess whether surgically placed G/J tubes reduce the postoperative complications in comparison to feeding J tubes. Methods: Over the past 18 months, 92 J tubes and 56 G/J tubes were placed during laparotomy at a single institution and the method chosen by surgeons' preference. The frequency of complications associated with each tube was determined by review of the postoperative medical records. Results: There was no enteric leakage in those patient given G/J tubes (p < 0.05). Furthermore 10{\%} of the patients receiving J tubes required operative repair of a J tube complication while no patient with an access complication following G/J tube placement required surgical repair (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that operative positioning of a jejunal feeding tube through a gastrostomy tube (surgical G/J tube) provides a safer route for enteral nutrition than does direct tube placement via the jejunal wall, by significantly reducing both the incidence of enteric leakage and the requirement for operative repair.",
keywords = "enteral nutrition access, gastro-jejunostomy tubes, jejunostomy tubes",
author = "Dennis Gore and Mark DeLegge and Alfred Gervin and DeMaria, {Eric J.}",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "144--146",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Nutrition",
issn = "0731-5724",
publisher = "American College Of Nutrition",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgically placed gastro-jejunostomy tubes have fewer complications compared to feeding jejunostomy tubes

AU - Gore, Dennis

AU - DeLegge, Mark

AU - Gervin, Alfred

AU - DeMaria, Eric J.

PY - 1996/4

Y1 - 1996/4

N2 - Objective: During laparotomy, jejunostomy tubes (J tubes) are often placed to provide access for enteral nutrition in the immediate postoperative period. However, the placement of such tubes may be associated with potentially devastating intra-abdominal complications possibly related to the tenuous security of a tube through the small bowel wall. An alternative method for enteral nutrition access is to surgically place a 'PEG-J' tube (i.e., surgical G/J tube) thus providing for jejunal feedings via a gastrotomy without a jejunotomy. The purpose of this study is to assess whether surgically placed G/J tubes reduce the postoperative complications in comparison to feeding J tubes. Methods: Over the past 18 months, 92 J tubes and 56 G/J tubes were placed during laparotomy at a single institution and the method chosen by surgeons' preference. The frequency of complications associated with each tube was determined by review of the postoperative medical records. Results: There was no enteric leakage in those patient given G/J tubes (p < 0.05). Furthermore 10% of the patients receiving J tubes required operative repair of a J tube complication while no patient with an access complication following G/J tube placement required surgical repair (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that operative positioning of a jejunal feeding tube through a gastrostomy tube (surgical G/J tube) provides a safer route for enteral nutrition than does direct tube placement via the jejunal wall, by significantly reducing both the incidence of enteric leakage and the requirement for operative repair.

AB - Objective: During laparotomy, jejunostomy tubes (J tubes) are often placed to provide access for enteral nutrition in the immediate postoperative period. However, the placement of such tubes may be associated with potentially devastating intra-abdominal complications possibly related to the tenuous security of a tube through the small bowel wall. An alternative method for enteral nutrition access is to surgically place a 'PEG-J' tube (i.e., surgical G/J tube) thus providing for jejunal feedings via a gastrotomy without a jejunotomy. The purpose of this study is to assess whether surgically placed G/J tubes reduce the postoperative complications in comparison to feeding J tubes. Methods: Over the past 18 months, 92 J tubes and 56 G/J tubes were placed during laparotomy at a single institution and the method chosen by surgeons' preference. The frequency of complications associated with each tube was determined by review of the postoperative medical records. Results: There was no enteric leakage in those patient given G/J tubes (p < 0.05). Furthermore 10% of the patients receiving J tubes required operative repair of a J tube complication while no patient with an access complication following G/J tube placement required surgical repair (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results demonstrate that operative positioning of a jejunal feeding tube through a gastrostomy tube (surgical G/J tube) provides a safer route for enteral nutrition than does direct tube placement via the jejunal wall, by significantly reducing both the incidence of enteric leakage and the requirement for operative repair.

KW - enteral nutrition access

KW - gastro-jejunostomy tubes

KW - jejunostomy tubes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029963020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029963020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 144

EP - 146

JO - Journal of the American College of Nutrition

JF - Journal of the American College of Nutrition

SN - 0731-5724

IS - 2

ER -