TY - JOUR
T1 - Surveillance of pancreatic cancer patients after surgical resection
AU - Sheffield, Kristin M.
AU - Crowell, Kristen T.
AU - Lin, Yu Li
AU - Djukom, Clarisse
AU - Goodwin, James S.
AU - Riall, Taylor S.
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was supported by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (RP101207) and a Cancer Prevention, Control, and Population Sciences Career Development Award (1K07CA13098-01A1) from the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. The collection of the California cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; the National Cancer Institute’s SEER Program under contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Northern California Cancer Center, contract N01-PC-35139 awarded to the University of Southern California, and contract N02-PC-15105 awarded to the Public Health Institute; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries, under agreement #U55/ CCR921930-02 awarded to the Public Health Institute. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and endorsement by the State of California, Department of Public Health, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or their contractors and subcontractors is not intended nor should it be inferred. The authors acknowledge the efforts of the Applied Research Program, NCI; the Office of Research, Development and Information, CMS; Information Management Services Inc.; and the SEER Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER–Medicare database.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Background. There are no clear recommendations to guide posttreatment surveillance in patients with pancreatic cancer. Our goal was to describe the posttreatment surveillance patterns in patients undergoing curative-intent resection for pancreatic cancer. Methods. We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) - Medicare linked data (1992-2005) to identify CT scans and physician visits in patientswith pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection (n = 2393). Surveillance began 90 days after surgery, and patients were followed for 2 years at 6-month intervals. Patients were censored if they died, experienced recurrence of disease, or entered hospice. Results. A total of 2045 patients survived uncensored to the beginning of the surveillance period. CT scan use decreased from 20.9% of patients in month 4 to 6.4% in month 27. There was no temporal pattern in CT use to suggest regular surveillance. Twenty-three percent of patients did not receive a CT scan in the year after surgery, increasing to 42% the second year. Patients who underwent adjuvant therapy and patients diagnosed in later years had higher CT scan use over the surveillance periods. Most patients visited both a primary care physician and a cancer specialist in each 6-month surveillance period. Patients who visited cancer specialists were more likely to have any CT scan and to be scanned more frequently. Conclusions. Current surveillance patterns after resection for pancreatic cancer reflect the lack of established guidelines, implying a need for evaluation and standardization of surveillance protocols. The lack of a temporal pattern in CT testing suggests that most were obtained to evaluate symptoms rather than for routine surveillance.
AB - Background. There are no clear recommendations to guide posttreatment surveillance in patients with pancreatic cancer. Our goal was to describe the posttreatment surveillance patterns in patients undergoing curative-intent resection for pancreatic cancer. Methods. We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) - Medicare linked data (1992-2005) to identify CT scans and physician visits in patientswith pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection (n = 2393). Surveillance began 90 days after surgery, and patients were followed for 2 years at 6-month intervals. Patients were censored if they died, experienced recurrence of disease, or entered hospice. Results. A total of 2045 patients survived uncensored to the beginning of the surveillance period. CT scan use decreased from 20.9% of patients in month 4 to 6.4% in month 27. There was no temporal pattern in CT use to suggest regular surveillance. Twenty-three percent of patients did not receive a CT scan in the year after surgery, increasing to 42% the second year. Patients who underwent adjuvant therapy and patients diagnosed in later years had higher CT scan use over the surveillance periods. Most patients visited both a primary care physician and a cancer specialist in each 6-month surveillance period. Patients who visited cancer specialists were more likely to have any CT scan and to be scanned more frequently. Conclusions. Current surveillance patterns after resection for pancreatic cancer reflect the lack of established guidelines, implying a need for evaluation and standardization of surveillance protocols. The lack of a temporal pattern in CT testing suggests that most were obtained to evaluate symptoms rather than for routine surveillance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862548711&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862548711&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-011-2152-y
DO - 10.1245/s10434-011-2152-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 22143577
AN - SCOPUS:84862548711
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 19
SP - 1670
EP - 1677
JO - Annals of surgical oncology
JF - Annals of surgical oncology
IS - 5
ER -