Abstract
Background and Objective: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the treatment of choice for cases with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Switching to an alternate anti-VEGF has been suggested as a possible option for resistant cases. The purpose of this review is to evaluate whether the timing of switching affects treatment outcomes. Patients and Methods: A review of published literature was performed looking at all studies where patients with refractory neovascular AMD were switched to an alternative anti-VEGF. Studies were then stratified based on the timing of switching into early (< 12 previous injections) and late (> 12 previous injections). Results: A total of 38 studies were identified: 18 where patients were switched early and 20 where they were switched late. Both subgroups showed anatomic improvement after switching, with limited visual gains. Conclusion: There are insufficient data to recommend early versus late switching. However, both groups showed a reduction of fluid on optical coherence tomography and visual gains in 25% to 30% of patients.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 166-170 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Ophthalmology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Switching anti-vascular endothelial growth factors in refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS