System-based factors influencing intraoperative decision-making in rectal cancer by surgeons: An international assessment

K. M. Augestad, R. O. Lindsetmo, J. J. Stulberg, H. Reynolds, B. Champagne, A. J. Senagore, C. P. Delaney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim Sound surgical judgement is the goal of training and experience; however, system-based factors may also colour selection of options by a surgeon. We analysed potential organizational characteristics that might influence rectal cancer decision-making by an experienced surgeon. Method One hundred and seventy-three international centres treating rectal cancer were invited to participate in a survey assessment of key treatment options for patients undergoing curative rectal-cancer surgery. The key organizational characteristics were analysed using multivariate methods for association with intra-operative surgical decision-making. Results The response rate was 71% (123 centres). Sphincter-saving surgery was more likely to be performed at university hospitals (OR=3.63, P=0.01) and by high-caseload surgeons (OR=2.77 P=0.05). A diverting stoma was performed more frequently in departments with clinical audits (OR=3.06, P=0.02), and a diverting stoma with coloanal anastomosis was more likely in European centres (OR=4.14, P=0.004). One-stage surgery was less likely where there was assessment by a multidisciplinary team (OR=0.24, P=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that university hospital, clinical audit, European centre, multidisciplinary team and high caseload significantly impacted on surgical decision-making. Conclusion Treatment variance of rectal cancer surgeons appears to be significantly influenced by organizational characteristics and complex team-based decision-making. System-based factors may need to be considered as a source of outcome variation that may impact on quality metrics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalColorectal Disease
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rectal Neoplasms
Decision Making
Clinical Audit
Multivariate Analysis
Color
Surgeons
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Consensus
  • Decision
  • Neoadjuvant therapy
  • Rectal cancer
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Augestad, K. M., Lindsetmo, R. O., Stulberg, J. J., Reynolds, H., Champagne, B., Senagore, A. J., & Delaney, C. P. (2012). System-based factors influencing intraoperative decision-making in rectal cancer by surgeons: An international assessment. Colorectal Disease, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03093.x

System-based factors influencing intraoperative decision-making in rectal cancer by surgeons : An international assessment. / Augestad, K. M.; Lindsetmo, R. O.; Stulberg, J. J.; Reynolds, H.; Champagne, B.; Senagore, A. J.; Delaney, C. P.

In: Colorectal Disease, Vol. 14, No. 10, 10.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Augestad, KM, Lindsetmo, RO, Stulberg, JJ, Reynolds, H, Champagne, B, Senagore, AJ & Delaney, CP 2012, 'System-based factors influencing intraoperative decision-making in rectal cancer by surgeons: An international assessment', Colorectal Disease, vol. 14, no. 10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03093.x
Augestad, K. M. ; Lindsetmo, R. O. ; Stulberg, J. J. ; Reynolds, H. ; Champagne, B. ; Senagore, A. J. ; Delaney, C. P. / System-based factors influencing intraoperative decision-making in rectal cancer by surgeons : An international assessment. In: Colorectal Disease. 2012 ; Vol. 14, No. 10.
@article{132301a5c19446a0a8169f20a17a228d,
title = "System-based factors influencing intraoperative decision-making in rectal cancer by surgeons: An international assessment",
abstract = "Aim Sound surgical judgement is the goal of training and experience; however, system-based factors may also colour selection of options by a surgeon. We analysed potential organizational characteristics that might influence rectal cancer decision-making by an experienced surgeon. Method One hundred and seventy-three international centres treating rectal cancer were invited to participate in a survey assessment of key treatment options for patients undergoing curative rectal-cancer surgery. The key organizational characteristics were analysed using multivariate methods for association with intra-operative surgical decision-making. Results The response rate was 71{\%} (123 centres). Sphincter-saving surgery was more likely to be performed at university hospitals (OR=3.63, P=0.01) and by high-caseload surgeons (OR=2.77 P=0.05). A diverting stoma was performed more frequently in departments with clinical audits (OR=3.06, P=0.02), and a diverting stoma with coloanal anastomosis was more likely in European centres (OR=4.14, P=0.004). One-stage surgery was less likely where there was assessment by a multidisciplinary team (OR=0.24, P=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that university hospital, clinical audit, European centre, multidisciplinary team and high caseload significantly impacted on surgical decision-making. Conclusion Treatment variance of rectal cancer surgeons appears to be significantly influenced by organizational characteristics and complex team-based decision-making. System-based factors may need to be considered as a source of outcome variation that may impact on quality metrics.",
keywords = "Consensus, Decision, Neoadjuvant therapy, Rectal cancer, Surgery",
author = "Augestad, {K. M.} and Lindsetmo, {R. O.} and Stulberg, {J. J.} and H. Reynolds and B. Champagne and Senagore, {A. J.} and Delaney, {C. P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03093.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "Colorectal Disease",
issn = "1462-8910",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - System-based factors influencing intraoperative decision-making in rectal cancer by surgeons

T2 - An international assessment

AU - Augestad, K. M.

AU - Lindsetmo, R. O.

AU - Stulberg, J. J.

AU - Reynolds, H.

AU - Champagne, B.

AU - Senagore, A. J.

AU - Delaney, C. P.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Aim Sound surgical judgement is the goal of training and experience; however, system-based factors may also colour selection of options by a surgeon. We analysed potential organizational characteristics that might influence rectal cancer decision-making by an experienced surgeon. Method One hundred and seventy-three international centres treating rectal cancer were invited to participate in a survey assessment of key treatment options for patients undergoing curative rectal-cancer surgery. The key organizational characteristics were analysed using multivariate methods for association with intra-operative surgical decision-making. Results The response rate was 71% (123 centres). Sphincter-saving surgery was more likely to be performed at university hospitals (OR=3.63, P=0.01) and by high-caseload surgeons (OR=2.77 P=0.05). A diverting stoma was performed more frequently in departments with clinical audits (OR=3.06, P=0.02), and a diverting stoma with coloanal anastomosis was more likely in European centres (OR=4.14, P=0.004). One-stage surgery was less likely where there was assessment by a multidisciplinary team (OR=0.24, P=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that university hospital, clinical audit, European centre, multidisciplinary team and high caseload significantly impacted on surgical decision-making. Conclusion Treatment variance of rectal cancer surgeons appears to be significantly influenced by organizational characteristics and complex team-based decision-making. System-based factors may need to be considered as a source of outcome variation that may impact on quality metrics.

AB - Aim Sound surgical judgement is the goal of training and experience; however, system-based factors may also colour selection of options by a surgeon. We analysed potential organizational characteristics that might influence rectal cancer decision-making by an experienced surgeon. Method One hundred and seventy-three international centres treating rectal cancer were invited to participate in a survey assessment of key treatment options for patients undergoing curative rectal-cancer surgery. The key organizational characteristics were analysed using multivariate methods for association with intra-operative surgical decision-making. Results The response rate was 71% (123 centres). Sphincter-saving surgery was more likely to be performed at university hospitals (OR=3.63, P=0.01) and by high-caseload surgeons (OR=2.77 P=0.05). A diverting stoma was performed more frequently in departments with clinical audits (OR=3.06, P=0.02), and a diverting stoma with coloanal anastomosis was more likely in European centres (OR=4.14, P=0.004). One-stage surgery was less likely where there was assessment by a multidisciplinary team (OR=0.24, P=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that university hospital, clinical audit, European centre, multidisciplinary team and high caseload significantly impacted on surgical decision-making. Conclusion Treatment variance of rectal cancer surgeons appears to be significantly influenced by organizational characteristics and complex team-based decision-making. System-based factors may need to be considered as a source of outcome variation that may impact on quality metrics.

KW - Consensus

KW - Decision

KW - Neoadjuvant therapy

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866405182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866405182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03093.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03093.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22607172

AN - SCOPUS:84866405182

VL - 14

JO - Colorectal Disease

JF - Colorectal Disease

SN - 1462-8910

IS - 10

ER -