Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions

Thomas T. Simopoulos, Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Sanjeeva Gupta, Steve M. Aydin, Chong Hwan Kim, Daneshvari Solanki, Devi E. Nampiaparampil, Vijay Singh, Peter S. Staats, Joshua A. Hirsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The sacroiliac joint is well known as a cause of low back and lower extremity pain. Prevalence estimates are 10% to 25% in patients with persistent axial low back pain without disc herniation, discogenic pain, or radiculitis based on multiple diagnostic studies and systematic reviews. However, at present there are no definitive management options for treating sacroiliac joint pain. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Study Design: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Methods: The available literature on diagnostic and therapeutic sacroiliac joint interventions was reviewed. The quality assessment criteria utilized were the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) checklist for diagnostic accuracy studies, Cochrane review criteria to assess sources of risk of bias, and Interventional Pain Management Techniques – Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM – QRB) criteria for randomized therapeutic trials and Interventional Pain Management Techniques – Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM – QRBNR) for observational therapeutic assessments. The level of evidence was based on a best evidence synthesis with modified grading of qualitative evidence from Level I to Level V. Data sources included relevant literature published from 1966 through March 2015 that were identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE, manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles, and all other sources. Outcome Measures: For the diagnostic accuracy assessment, and for the therapeutic modalities, the primary outcome measure of pain relief and improvement in functional status were utilized. Results: A total of 11 diagnostic accuracy studies and 14 therapeutic studies were included. The evidence for diagnostic accuracy is Level II for dual diagnostic blocks with at least 70% pain relief as the criterion standard and Level III evidence for single diagnostic blocks with at least 75% pain relief as the criterion standard. The evidence for cooled radiofrequency neurotomy in managing sacroiliac joint pain is Level II to III. The evidence for conventional radiofrequency neurotomy, intraarticular steroid injections, and periarticular injections with steroids or botulinum toxin is limited: Level III or IV. Limitations: The limitations of this systematic review include inconsistencies in diagnostic accuracy studies with a paucity of high quality, replicative, and consistent literature. The limitations for therapeutic interventions include variations in technique, variable diagnostic standards for inclusion criteria, and variable results. Conclusion: The evidence for the accuracy of diagnostic and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions varied from Level II to Level IV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E713-E756
JournalPain Physician
Volume18
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Sacroiliac Joint
Pain
Therapeutics
Arthralgia
Pain Management
Steroids
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Intra-Articular Injections
Radiculopathy
Botulinum Toxins
Information Storage and Retrieval
Bibliography
Low Back Pain
Checklist
PubMed
Lower Extremity
Injections

Keywords

  • Chronic low back pain
  • Pulsed radiofrequency
  • Sacroiliac joint dysfunction
  • Sacroiliac joint injection
  • Sacroiliac joint pain
  • Sacroiliitis
  • Thermal radiofrequency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Simopoulos, T. T., Manchikanti, L., Gupta, S., Aydin, S. M., Kim, C. H., Solanki, D., ... Hirsch, J. A. (2015). Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Physician, 18(5), E713-E756.

Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. / Simopoulos, Thomas T.; Manchikanti, Laxmaiah; Gupta, Sanjeeva; Aydin, Steve M.; Kim, Chong Hwan; Solanki, Daneshvari; Nampiaparampil, Devi E.; Singh, Vijay; Staats, Peter S.; Hirsch, Joshua A.

In: Pain Physician, Vol. 18, No. 5, 01.09.2015, p. E713-E756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simopoulos, TT, Manchikanti, L, Gupta, S, Aydin, SM, Kim, CH, Solanki, D, Nampiaparampil, DE, Singh, V, Staats, PS & Hirsch, JA 2015, 'Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions', Pain Physician, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. E713-E756.
Simopoulos TT, Manchikanti L, Gupta S, Aydin SM, Kim CH, Solanki D et al. Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Physician. 2015 Sep 1;18(5):E713-E756.
Simopoulos, Thomas T. ; Manchikanti, Laxmaiah ; Gupta, Sanjeeva ; Aydin, Steve M. ; Kim, Chong Hwan ; Solanki, Daneshvari ; Nampiaparampil, Devi E. ; Singh, Vijay ; Staats, Peter S. ; Hirsch, Joshua A. / Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. In: Pain Physician. 2015 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. E713-E756.
@article{46dbdd081b794f489eac518a55c80571,
title = "Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions",
abstract = "Background: The sacroiliac joint is well known as a cause of low back and lower extremity pain. Prevalence estimates are 10{\%} to 25{\%} in patients with persistent axial low back pain without disc herniation, discogenic pain, or radiculitis based on multiple diagnostic studies and systematic reviews. However, at present there are no definitive management options for treating sacroiliac joint pain. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Study Design: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Methods: The available literature on diagnostic and therapeutic sacroiliac joint interventions was reviewed. The quality assessment criteria utilized were the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) checklist for diagnostic accuracy studies, Cochrane review criteria to assess sources of risk of bias, and Interventional Pain Management Techniques – Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM – QRB) criteria for randomized therapeutic trials and Interventional Pain Management Techniques – Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM – QRBNR) for observational therapeutic assessments. The level of evidence was based on a best evidence synthesis with modified grading of qualitative evidence from Level I to Level V. Data sources included relevant literature published from 1966 through March 2015 that were identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE, manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles, and all other sources. Outcome Measures: For the diagnostic accuracy assessment, and for the therapeutic modalities, the primary outcome measure of pain relief and improvement in functional status were utilized. Results: A total of 11 diagnostic accuracy studies and 14 therapeutic studies were included. The evidence for diagnostic accuracy is Level II for dual diagnostic blocks with at least 70{\%} pain relief as the criterion standard and Level III evidence for single diagnostic blocks with at least 75{\%} pain relief as the criterion standard. The evidence for cooled radiofrequency neurotomy in managing sacroiliac joint pain is Level II to III. The evidence for conventional radiofrequency neurotomy, intraarticular steroid injections, and periarticular injections with steroids or botulinum toxin is limited: Level III or IV. Limitations: The limitations of this systematic review include inconsistencies in diagnostic accuracy studies with a paucity of high quality, replicative, and consistent literature. The limitations for therapeutic interventions include variations in technique, variable diagnostic standards for inclusion criteria, and variable results. Conclusion: The evidence for the accuracy of diagnostic and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions varied from Level II to Level IV.",
keywords = "Chronic low back pain, Pulsed radiofrequency, Sacroiliac joint dysfunction, Sacroiliac joint injection, Sacroiliac joint pain, Sacroiliitis, Thermal radiofrequency",
author = "Simopoulos, {Thomas T.} and Laxmaiah Manchikanti and Sanjeeva Gupta and Aydin, {Steve M.} and Kim, {Chong Hwan} and Daneshvari Solanki and Nampiaparampil, {Devi E.} and Vijay Singh and Staats, {Peter S.} and Hirsch, {Joshua A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "E713--E756",
journal = "Pain Physician",
issn = "1533-3159",
publisher = "Association of Pain Management Anesthesiologists",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions

AU - Simopoulos, Thomas T.

AU - Manchikanti, Laxmaiah

AU - Gupta, Sanjeeva

AU - Aydin, Steve M.

AU - Kim, Chong Hwan

AU - Solanki, Daneshvari

AU - Nampiaparampil, Devi E.

AU - Singh, Vijay

AU - Staats, Peter S.

AU - Hirsch, Joshua A.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Background: The sacroiliac joint is well known as a cause of low back and lower extremity pain. Prevalence estimates are 10% to 25% in patients with persistent axial low back pain without disc herniation, discogenic pain, or radiculitis based on multiple diagnostic studies and systematic reviews. However, at present there are no definitive management options for treating sacroiliac joint pain. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Study Design: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Methods: The available literature on diagnostic and therapeutic sacroiliac joint interventions was reviewed. The quality assessment criteria utilized were the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) checklist for diagnostic accuracy studies, Cochrane review criteria to assess sources of risk of bias, and Interventional Pain Management Techniques – Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM – QRB) criteria for randomized therapeutic trials and Interventional Pain Management Techniques – Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM – QRBNR) for observational therapeutic assessments. The level of evidence was based on a best evidence synthesis with modified grading of qualitative evidence from Level I to Level V. Data sources included relevant literature published from 1966 through March 2015 that were identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE, manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles, and all other sources. Outcome Measures: For the diagnostic accuracy assessment, and for the therapeutic modalities, the primary outcome measure of pain relief and improvement in functional status were utilized. Results: A total of 11 diagnostic accuracy studies and 14 therapeutic studies were included. The evidence for diagnostic accuracy is Level II for dual diagnostic blocks with at least 70% pain relief as the criterion standard and Level III evidence for single diagnostic blocks with at least 75% pain relief as the criterion standard. The evidence for cooled radiofrequency neurotomy in managing sacroiliac joint pain is Level II to III. The evidence for conventional radiofrequency neurotomy, intraarticular steroid injections, and periarticular injections with steroids or botulinum toxin is limited: Level III or IV. Limitations: The limitations of this systematic review include inconsistencies in diagnostic accuracy studies with a paucity of high quality, replicative, and consistent literature. The limitations for therapeutic interventions include variations in technique, variable diagnostic standards for inclusion criteria, and variable results. Conclusion: The evidence for the accuracy of diagnostic and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions varied from Level II to Level IV.

AB - Background: The sacroiliac joint is well known as a cause of low back and lower extremity pain. Prevalence estimates are 10% to 25% in patients with persistent axial low back pain without disc herniation, discogenic pain, or radiculitis based on multiple diagnostic studies and systematic reviews. However, at present there are no definitive management options for treating sacroiliac joint pain. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Study Design: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions. Methods: The available literature on diagnostic and therapeutic sacroiliac joint interventions was reviewed. The quality assessment criteria utilized were the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) checklist for diagnostic accuracy studies, Cochrane review criteria to assess sources of risk of bias, and Interventional Pain Management Techniques – Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM – QRB) criteria for randomized therapeutic trials and Interventional Pain Management Techniques – Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM – QRBNR) for observational therapeutic assessments. The level of evidence was based on a best evidence synthesis with modified grading of qualitative evidence from Level I to Level V. Data sources included relevant literature published from 1966 through March 2015 that were identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE, manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles, and all other sources. Outcome Measures: For the diagnostic accuracy assessment, and for the therapeutic modalities, the primary outcome measure of pain relief and improvement in functional status were utilized. Results: A total of 11 diagnostic accuracy studies and 14 therapeutic studies were included. The evidence for diagnostic accuracy is Level II for dual diagnostic blocks with at least 70% pain relief as the criterion standard and Level III evidence for single diagnostic blocks with at least 75% pain relief as the criterion standard. The evidence for cooled radiofrequency neurotomy in managing sacroiliac joint pain is Level II to III. The evidence for conventional radiofrequency neurotomy, intraarticular steroid injections, and periarticular injections with steroids or botulinum toxin is limited: Level III or IV. Limitations: The limitations of this systematic review include inconsistencies in diagnostic accuracy studies with a paucity of high quality, replicative, and consistent literature. The limitations for therapeutic interventions include variations in technique, variable diagnostic standards for inclusion criteria, and variable results. Conclusion: The evidence for the accuracy of diagnostic and therapeutic effectiveness of sacroiliac joint interventions varied from Level II to Level IV.

KW - Chronic low back pain

KW - Pulsed radiofrequency

KW - Sacroiliac joint dysfunction

KW - Sacroiliac joint injection

KW - Sacroiliac joint pain

KW - Sacroiliitis

KW - Thermal radiofrequency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942093986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942093986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 26431129

AN - SCOPUS:84942093986

VL - 18

SP - E713-E756

JO - Pain Physician

JF - Pain Physician

SN - 1533-3159

IS - 5

ER -