Tale of two sites: Capillary versus arterial blood glucose testing in the operating room

Felix Akinbami, Scott Segal, Jeffrey L. Schnipper, Matthias Stopfkuchen-Evans, Jonathan Mills, Selwyn O. Rogers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Pre- and intraoperative glycemic control has been identified as a putative target to improve outcomes of surgical patients. Glycemic control requires frequent monitoring of blood glucose levels with appropriate adjustments. However, monitoring standards have been called into question, especially in cases in which capillary samples are used. Point-of-care testing (POCT) using capillary samples and glucometers has been noted to give relatively accurate results for critically ill patients. However, the package inserts of most glucometers warn that they should not be used for patients in shock. This has led clinicians to doubt their accuracy in the operating room. The accuracy of capillary samples when tested in patients undergoing surgical procedures has not been proven. This study aims to determine the accuracy of intraoperative blood glucose values using capillary samples relative to arterial samples. Methods: A prospective study was conducted by collecting paired capillary and arterial samples of patients undergoing major operations at a tertiary medical center from August 2009 to May 2011. Subjects were a convenience sample of patients who had arterial lines and needed glucose testing while undergoing the procedure. Precision Xceed Pro (Abbott) handheld glucometers were used to obtain the blood glucose values. Our primary outcome of interest was the degree of correlation between capillary and arterial blood glucose values or the degree to which arterial glucose levels can be predicted by capillary glucose samples. We used linear regression and the Student t tests for statistical analyses. Results: Seventy-two-paired samples were collected. Of the cases, 54% were major abdominal operations, whereas 24% were vascular operations. The mean values ± standard deviation for glucose levels were 146 ± 35 mg/dL (capillary) and 147 ± 36 mg/dL (arterial). The mean time ± standard deviation between the collection of both samples was 3.5 ± 1.3 minutes. The regression coefficient showed a strong positive correlation of.91 between capillary glucose values and arterial values (P <.001) although correlation was less stringent at the hyperglycemic range of values. The R 2 statistic was 84%. Differences in values between capillary and arterial samples would not have altered the diagnosis of hypo- and hyperglycemia using typical thresholds. Conclusions: Capillary samples collected intraoperatively are strongly correlated with arterial samples. Glucose monitoring in the operating room can be safely performed by collecting capillary samples for POCT. However, clinicians should still be cautious when interpreting glucose levels that are high, either by repeating the blood glucose test or by having samples sent to the laboratory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)423-427
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume203
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
Blood Glucose
Glucose
Product Labeling
Vascular Access Devices
Hematologic Tests
Hypoglycemia
Critical Illness
Hyperglycemia
Blood Vessels
Linear Models
Shock
Prospective Studies
Students

Keywords

  • Arterial
  • Blood glucose monitoring
  • Capillary
  • Intraoperative
  • Point-of-care testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Akinbami, F., Segal, S., Schnipper, J. L., Stopfkuchen-Evans, M., Mills, J., & Rogers, S. O. (2012). Tale of two sites: Capillary versus arterial blood glucose testing in the operating room. American Journal of Surgery, 203(4), 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.013

Tale of two sites : Capillary versus arterial blood glucose testing in the operating room. / Akinbami, Felix; Segal, Scott; Schnipper, Jeffrey L.; Stopfkuchen-Evans, Matthias; Mills, Jonathan; Rogers, Selwyn O.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 203, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 423-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Akinbami, F, Segal, S, Schnipper, JL, Stopfkuchen-Evans, M, Mills, J & Rogers, SO 2012, 'Tale of two sites: Capillary versus arterial blood glucose testing in the operating room', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 203, no. 4, pp. 423-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.013
Akinbami, Felix ; Segal, Scott ; Schnipper, Jeffrey L. ; Stopfkuchen-Evans, Matthias ; Mills, Jonathan ; Rogers, Selwyn O. / Tale of two sites : Capillary versus arterial blood glucose testing in the operating room. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 203, No. 4. pp. 423-427.
@article{c631509623e54a09ae16ce40e01ef525,
title = "Tale of two sites: Capillary versus arterial blood glucose testing in the operating room",
abstract = "Introduction: Pre- and intraoperative glycemic control has been identified as a putative target to improve outcomes of surgical patients. Glycemic control requires frequent monitoring of blood glucose levels with appropriate adjustments. However, monitoring standards have been called into question, especially in cases in which capillary samples are used. Point-of-care testing (POCT) using capillary samples and glucometers has been noted to give relatively accurate results for critically ill patients. However, the package inserts of most glucometers warn that they should not be used for patients in shock. This has led clinicians to doubt their accuracy in the operating room. The accuracy of capillary samples when tested in patients undergoing surgical procedures has not been proven. This study aims to determine the accuracy of intraoperative blood glucose values using capillary samples relative to arterial samples. Methods: A prospective study was conducted by collecting paired capillary and arterial samples of patients undergoing major operations at a tertiary medical center from August 2009 to May 2011. Subjects were a convenience sample of patients who had arterial lines and needed glucose testing while undergoing the procedure. Precision Xceed Pro (Abbott) handheld glucometers were used to obtain the blood glucose values. Our primary outcome of interest was the degree of correlation between capillary and arterial blood glucose values or the degree to which arterial glucose levels can be predicted by capillary glucose samples. We used linear regression and the Student t tests for statistical analyses. Results: Seventy-two-paired samples were collected. Of the cases, 54{\%} were major abdominal operations, whereas 24{\%} were vascular operations. The mean values ± standard deviation for glucose levels were 146 ± 35 mg/dL (capillary) and 147 ± 36 mg/dL (arterial). The mean time ± standard deviation between the collection of both samples was 3.5 ± 1.3 minutes. The regression coefficient showed a strong positive correlation of.91 between capillary glucose values and arterial values (P <.001) although correlation was less stringent at the hyperglycemic range of values. The R 2 statistic was 84{\%}. Differences in values between capillary and arterial samples would not have altered the diagnosis of hypo- and hyperglycemia using typical thresholds. Conclusions: Capillary samples collected intraoperatively are strongly correlated with arterial samples. Glucose monitoring in the operating room can be safely performed by collecting capillary samples for POCT. However, clinicians should still be cautious when interpreting glucose levels that are high, either by repeating the blood glucose test or by having samples sent to the laboratory.",
keywords = "Arterial, Blood glucose monitoring, Capillary, Intraoperative, Point-of-care testing",
author = "Felix Akinbami and Scott Segal and Schnipper, {Jeffrey L.} and Matthias Stopfkuchen-Evans and Jonathan Mills and Rogers, {Selwyn O.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "203",
pages = "423--427",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tale of two sites

T2 - Capillary versus arterial blood glucose testing in the operating room

AU - Akinbami, Felix

AU - Segal, Scott

AU - Schnipper, Jeffrey L.

AU - Stopfkuchen-Evans, Matthias

AU - Mills, Jonathan

AU - Rogers, Selwyn O.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Introduction: Pre- and intraoperative glycemic control has been identified as a putative target to improve outcomes of surgical patients. Glycemic control requires frequent monitoring of blood glucose levels with appropriate adjustments. However, monitoring standards have been called into question, especially in cases in which capillary samples are used. Point-of-care testing (POCT) using capillary samples and glucometers has been noted to give relatively accurate results for critically ill patients. However, the package inserts of most glucometers warn that they should not be used for patients in shock. This has led clinicians to doubt their accuracy in the operating room. The accuracy of capillary samples when tested in patients undergoing surgical procedures has not been proven. This study aims to determine the accuracy of intraoperative blood glucose values using capillary samples relative to arterial samples. Methods: A prospective study was conducted by collecting paired capillary and arterial samples of patients undergoing major operations at a tertiary medical center from August 2009 to May 2011. Subjects were a convenience sample of patients who had arterial lines and needed glucose testing while undergoing the procedure. Precision Xceed Pro (Abbott) handheld glucometers were used to obtain the blood glucose values. Our primary outcome of interest was the degree of correlation between capillary and arterial blood glucose values or the degree to which arterial glucose levels can be predicted by capillary glucose samples. We used linear regression and the Student t tests for statistical analyses. Results: Seventy-two-paired samples were collected. Of the cases, 54% were major abdominal operations, whereas 24% were vascular operations. The mean values ± standard deviation for glucose levels were 146 ± 35 mg/dL (capillary) and 147 ± 36 mg/dL (arterial). The mean time ± standard deviation between the collection of both samples was 3.5 ± 1.3 minutes. The regression coefficient showed a strong positive correlation of.91 between capillary glucose values and arterial values (P <.001) although correlation was less stringent at the hyperglycemic range of values. The R 2 statistic was 84%. Differences in values between capillary and arterial samples would not have altered the diagnosis of hypo- and hyperglycemia using typical thresholds. Conclusions: Capillary samples collected intraoperatively are strongly correlated with arterial samples. Glucose monitoring in the operating room can be safely performed by collecting capillary samples for POCT. However, clinicians should still be cautious when interpreting glucose levels that are high, either by repeating the blood glucose test or by having samples sent to the laboratory.

AB - Introduction: Pre- and intraoperative glycemic control has been identified as a putative target to improve outcomes of surgical patients. Glycemic control requires frequent monitoring of blood glucose levels with appropriate adjustments. However, monitoring standards have been called into question, especially in cases in which capillary samples are used. Point-of-care testing (POCT) using capillary samples and glucometers has been noted to give relatively accurate results for critically ill patients. However, the package inserts of most glucometers warn that they should not be used for patients in shock. This has led clinicians to doubt their accuracy in the operating room. The accuracy of capillary samples when tested in patients undergoing surgical procedures has not been proven. This study aims to determine the accuracy of intraoperative blood glucose values using capillary samples relative to arterial samples. Methods: A prospective study was conducted by collecting paired capillary and arterial samples of patients undergoing major operations at a tertiary medical center from August 2009 to May 2011. Subjects were a convenience sample of patients who had arterial lines and needed glucose testing while undergoing the procedure. Precision Xceed Pro (Abbott) handheld glucometers were used to obtain the blood glucose values. Our primary outcome of interest was the degree of correlation between capillary and arterial blood glucose values or the degree to which arterial glucose levels can be predicted by capillary glucose samples. We used linear regression and the Student t tests for statistical analyses. Results: Seventy-two-paired samples were collected. Of the cases, 54% were major abdominal operations, whereas 24% were vascular operations. The mean values ± standard deviation for glucose levels were 146 ± 35 mg/dL (capillary) and 147 ± 36 mg/dL (arterial). The mean time ± standard deviation between the collection of both samples was 3.5 ± 1.3 minutes. The regression coefficient showed a strong positive correlation of.91 between capillary glucose values and arterial values (P <.001) although correlation was less stringent at the hyperglycemic range of values. The R 2 statistic was 84%. Differences in values between capillary and arterial samples would not have altered the diagnosis of hypo- and hyperglycemia using typical thresholds. Conclusions: Capillary samples collected intraoperatively are strongly correlated with arterial samples. Glucose monitoring in the operating room can be safely performed by collecting capillary samples for POCT. However, clinicians should still be cautious when interpreting glucose levels that are high, either by repeating the blood glucose test or by having samples sent to the laboratory.

KW - Arterial

KW - Blood glucose monitoring

KW - Capillary

KW - Intraoperative

KW - Point-of-care testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859108240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859108240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.013

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 22365099

AN - SCOPUS:84859108240

VL - 203

SP - 423

EP - 427

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 4

ER -