TY - JOUR
T1 - Teaching paradigm for decision making in facial skin defect reconstructions
AU - Calhoun, Karen H.
AU - Seikaly, Hadi
AU - Quinn, Francis B.
PY - 1998/1
Y1 - 1998/1
N2 - Objective: To present a decision paradigm for facial defect reconstruction, and test the ability of this paradigm to improve resident performance. Design: A decision paradigm for reconstruction of facial skin defects is proposed and explained, with patient examples. The paradigm's usefulness is the tested with residents. Setting: Otolaryngology residency training program at a tertiary hospital. Study Participants: Otolaryngology residents. Interventions: Twelve residents took a pretest wherin they were presented with drawings of skin defects and asked to choose the 'best' (most aesthetically pleasing) type of reconstruction from a closed set. This paradigm was presented to these residents, and their posttest consisted of choosing again with the same defects and closed set of choices. Main Outcome Measures: Cosmetic outcomes of reconstructive decisions on the pretest and posttest were rated on a scale of 0 to 5 (with 0 indicating poor; 5, excellent). Results: There was a significant improvement in reconstructive choices between the pretest and posttest (P<.001, Student t test). Conclusion: This paradigm can be easily modified to accommodate different surgical approaches preferred by individual surgeons and is thus useful in almost any reconstructive teaching situation.
AB - Objective: To present a decision paradigm for facial defect reconstruction, and test the ability of this paradigm to improve resident performance. Design: A decision paradigm for reconstruction of facial skin defects is proposed and explained, with patient examples. The paradigm's usefulness is the tested with residents. Setting: Otolaryngology residency training program at a tertiary hospital. Study Participants: Otolaryngology residents. Interventions: Twelve residents took a pretest wherin they were presented with drawings of skin defects and asked to choose the 'best' (most aesthetically pleasing) type of reconstruction from a closed set. This paradigm was presented to these residents, and their posttest consisted of choosing again with the same defects and closed set of choices. Main Outcome Measures: Cosmetic outcomes of reconstructive decisions on the pretest and posttest were rated on a scale of 0 to 5 (with 0 indicating poor; 5, excellent). Results: There was a significant improvement in reconstructive choices between the pretest and posttest (P<.001, Student t test). Conclusion: This paradigm can be easily modified to accommodate different surgical approaches preferred by individual surgeons and is thus useful in almost any reconstructive teaching situation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031910353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031910353&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/archotol.124.1.60
DO - 10.1001/archotol.124.1.60
M3 - Article
C2 - 9440782
AN - SCOPUS:0031910353
SN - 0886-4470
VL - 124
SP - 60
EP - 66
JO - Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
JF - Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
IS - 1
ER -