Tests of the Accuracy and Speed of Categorizing Foods into Child vs Professional Categories Using Two Methods of Browsing with Children

Tom Baranowski, Alicia Beltran, Shelby Martin, Kathleen B. Watson, Noemi Islam, Shay Robertson, Stephanie Berno, Hafza Dadabhoy, Debbe Thompson, Karen Cullen, Richard Buday, Amy F. Subar, Janice Baranowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research tested whether children could categorize foods more accurately and speedily when presented with child-generated rather than professionally generated food categories, and whether a graphically appealing browse procedure similar to the Apple iTunes (Cupertino, CA) "cover flow" graphical user interface accomplished this better than the more common tree-view structure. In Fall 2008, 104 multiethnic children ages 8 to 13 were recruited at the Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX) and randomly assigned to two browse procedures: cover flow (collages of foods in a category) or tree view (food categories in a list). Within each browse condition children categorized the same randomly ordered 26 diverse foods to both child and professionally organized categories (with method randomly sequenced per child). Acceptance of categorization was determined by registered dietitians. Speed of categorization was recorded by the computer. Differences between methods were determined by repeated measures analysis of variance. Younger children (8 to 9 years old) tended to have lower acceptance and longer speeds of categorization. The quickest categorization was obtained with child categories in a tree structure. Computerized dietary reporting by children can use child-generated food categories and tree structures to organize foods for browsing in a hierarchically organized structure to enhance speed of categorization, but not accuracy. A computerized recall may not be appropriate for children 9 years of age or younger.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-94
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Dietetic Association
Volume110
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

browsing
Food
testing
methodology
user interface
Nutritionists
Malus
dietitians
Analysis of Variance
medicine
apples
analysis of variance
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Tests of the Accuracy and Speed of Categorizing Foods into Child vs Professional Categories Using Two Methods of Browsing with Children. / Baranowski, Tom; Beltran, Alicia; Martin, Shelby; Watson, Kathleen B.; Islam, Noemi; Robertson, Shay; Berno, Stephanie; Dadabhoy, Hafza; Thompson, Debbe; Cullen, Karen; Buday, Richard; Subar, Amy F.; Baranowski, Janice.

In: Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Vol. 110, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 91-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baranowski, T, Beltran, A, Martin, S, Watson, KB, Islam, N, Robertson, S, Berno, S, Dadabhoy, H, Thompson, D, Cullen, K, Buday, R, Subar, AF & Baranowski, J 2010, 'Tests of the Accuracy and Speed of Categorizing Foods into Child vs Professional Categories Using Two Methods of Browsing with Children', Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.006
Baranowski, Tom ; Beltran, Alicia ; Martin, Shelby ; Watson, Kathleen B. ; Islam, Noemi ; Robertson, Shay ; Berno, Stephanie ; Dadabhoy, Hafza ; Thompson, Debbe ; Cullen, Karen ; Buday, Richard ; Subar, Amy F. ; Baranowski, Janice. / Tests of the Accuracy and Speed of Categorizing Foods into Child vs Professional Categories Using Two Methods of Browsing with Children. In: Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2010 ; Vol. 110, No. 1. pp. 91-94.
@article{4351f3c0b9474e63acaf421aa6a68be0,
title = "Tests of the Accuracy and Speed of Categorizing Foods into Child vs Professional Categories Using Two Methods of Browsing with Children",
abstract = "This research tested whether children could categorize foods more accurately and speedily when presented with child-generated rather than professionally generated food categories, and whether a graphically appealing browse procedure similar to the Apple iTunes (Cupertino, CA) {"}cover flow{"} graphical user interface accomplished this better than the more common tree-view structure. In Fall 2008, 104 multiethnic children ages 8 to 13 were recruited at the Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX) and randomly assigned to two browse procedures: cover flow (collages of foods in a category) or tree view (food categories in a list). Within each browse condition children categorized the same randomly ordered 26 diverse foods to both child and professionally organized categories (with method randomly sequenced per child). Acceptance of categorization was determined by registered dietitians. Speed of categorization was recorded by the computer. Differences between methods were determined by repeated measures analysis of variance. Younger children (8 to 9 years old) tended to have lower acceptance and longer speeds of categorization. The quickest categorization was obtained with child categories in a tree structure. Computerized dietary reporting by children can use child-generated food categories and tree structures to organize foods for browsing in a hierarchically organized structure to enhance speed of categorization, but not accuracy. A computerized recall may not be appropriate for children 9 years of age or younger.",
author = "Tom Baranowski and Alicia Beltran and Shelby Martin and Watson, {Kathleen B.} and Noemi Islam and Shay Robertson and Stephanie Berno and Hafza Dadabhoy and Debbe Thompson and Karen Cullen and Richard Buday and Subar, {Amy F.} and Janice Baranowski",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "91--94",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "2212-2672",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tests of the Accuracy and Speed of Categorizing Foods into Child vs Professional Categories Using Two Methods of Browsing with Children

AU - Baranowski, Tom

AU - Beltran, Alicia

AU - Martin, Shelby

AU - Watson, Kathleen B.

AU - Islam, Noemi

AU - Robertson, Shay

AU - Berno, Stephanie

AU - Dadabhoy, Hafza

AU - Thompson, Debbe

AU - Cullen, Karen

AU - Buday, Richard

AU - Subar, Amy F.

AU - Baranowski, Janice

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - This research tested whether children could categorize foods more accurately and speedily when presented with child-generated rather than professionally generated food categories, and whether a graphically appealing browse procedure similar to the Apple iTunes (Cupertino, CA) "cover flow" graphical user interface accomplished this better than the more common tree-view structure. In Fall 2008, 104 multiethnic children ages 8 to 13 were recruited at the Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX) and randomly assigned to two browse procedures: cover flow (collages of foods in a category) or tree view (food categories in a list). Within each browse condition children categorized the same randomly ordered 26 diverse foods to both child and professionally organized categories (with method randomly sequenced per child). Acceptance of categorization was determined by registered dietitians. Speed of categorization was recorded by the computer. Differences between methods were determined by repeated measures analysis of variance. Younger children (8 to 9 years old) tended to have lower acceptance and longer speeds of categorization. The quickest categorization was obtained with child categories in a tree structure. Computerized dietary reporting by children can use child-generated food categories and tree structures to organize foods for browsing in a hierarchically organized structure to enhance speed of categorization, but not accuracy. A computerized recall may not be appropriate for children 9 years of age or younger.

AB - This research tested whether children could categorize foods more accurately and speedily when presented with child-generated rather than professionally generated food categories, and whether a graphically appealing browse procedure similar to the Apple iTunes (Cupertino, CA) "cover flow" graphical user interface accomplished this better than the more common tree-view structure. In Fall 2008, 104 multiethnic children ages 8 to 13 were recruited at the Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX) and randomly assigned to two browse procedures: cover flow (collages of foods in a category) or tree view (food categories in a list). Within each browse condition children categorized the same randomly ordered 26 diverse foods to both child and professionally organized categories (with method randomly sequenced per child). Acceptance of categorization was determined by registered dietitians. Speed of categorization was recorded by the computer. Differences between methods were determined by repeated measures analysis of variance. Younger children (8 to 9 years old) tended to have lower acceptance and longer speeds of categorization. The quickest categorization was obtained with child categories in a tree structure. Computerized dietary reporting by children can use child-generated food categories and tree structures to organize foods for browsing in a hierarchically organized structure to enhance speed of categorization, but not accuracy. A computerized recall may not be appropriate for children 9 years of age or younger.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72149103319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72149103319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.006

M3 - Article

VL - 110

SP - 91

EP - 94

JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 2212-2672

IS - 1

ER -