The 30-Minute Decision-to-Incision Interval for Emergency Cesarean Delivery

Fact or Fiction?

Fayez K. Nasrallah, Hassan Harirah, Rakesh Vadhera, Venu Jain, Letitia T. Franklin, Gary Hankins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the current guideline of 30-minute decision-to-incision interval (D-I) in emergent cesarean delivery (ECD) on neonatal and maternal outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted of pregnant women who underwent ECDs between January 1999 and December 2001. The overall median D-I was 20 minutes (range, 5 to 57 minutes). In 83 women (group I), D-I was ≤30 minutes, and in 28 women (group II), it exceeded 30 minutes. Group I had more neonates with cord pH <7.00, seizures, encephalopathy, and lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes than group II, but were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in neonatal admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or length of stay between the two groups. Maternal complications were higher in group I, but not statistically significant. Although it was achieved in most of the ECDs, the guideline of 30-minute D-I does not seem to improve neonatal nor worsen maternal outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-68
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2004

Fingerprint

Emergencies
Mothers
Guidelines
Apgar Score
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Brain Diseases
Pregnant Women
Length of Stay
Seizures
Newborn Infant

Keywords

  • Decision-to-incision
  • Emergency cesarean delivery
  • Neonatal and maternal outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The 30-Minute Decision-to-Incision Interval for Emergency Cesarean Delivery : Fact or Fiction? / Nasrallah, Fayez K.; Harirah, Hassan; Vadhera, Rakesh; Jain, Venu; Franklin, Letitia T.; Hankins, Gary.

In: American Journal of Perinatology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 02.2004, p. 63-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nasrallah, Fayez K. ; Harirah, Hassan ; Vadhera, Rakesh ; Jain, Venu ; Franklin, Letitia T. ; Hankins, Gary. / The 30-Minute Decision-to-Incision Interval for Emergency Cesarean Delivery : Fact or Fiction?. In: American Journal of Perinatology. 2004 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 63-68.
@article{1fa97d27ab3c40e696f307c9c8139cbc,
title = "The 30-Minute Decision-to-Incision Interval for Emergency Cesarean Delivery: Fact or Fiction?",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the current guideline of 30-minute decision-to-incision interval (D-I) in emergent cesarean delivery (ECD) on neonatal and maternal outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted of pregnant women who underwent ECDs between January 1999 and December 2001. The overall median D-I was 20 minutes (range, 5 to 57 minutes). In 83 women (group I), D-I was ≤30 minutes, and in 28 women (group II), it exceeded 30 minutes. Group I had more neonates with cord pH <7.00, seizures, encephalopathy, and lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes than group II, but were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in neonatal admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or length of stay between the two groups. Maternal complications were higher in group I, but not statistically significant. Although it was achieved in most of the ECDs, the guideline of 30-minute D-I does not seem to improve neonatal nor worsen maternal outcomes.",
keywords = "Decision-to-incision, Emergency cesarean delivery, Neonatal and maternal outcomes",
author = "Nasrallah, {Fayez K.} and Hassan Harirah and Rakesh Vadhera and Venu Jain and Franklin, {Letitia T.} and Gary Hankins",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1055/s-2004-820513",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "63--68",
journal = "American Journal of Perinatology",
issn = "0735-1631",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The 30-Minute Decision-to-Incision Interval for Emergency Cesarean Delivery

T2 - Fact or Fiction?

AU - Nasrallah, Fayez K.

AU - Harirah, Hassan

AU - Vadhera, Rakesh

AU - Jain, Venu

AU - Franklin, Letitia T.

AU - Hankins, Gary

PY - 2004/2

Y1 - 2004/2

N2 - The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the current guideline of 30-minute decision-to-incision interval (D-I) in emergent cesarean delivery (ECD) on neonatal and maternal outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted of pregnant women who underwent ECDs between January 1999 and December 2001. The overall median D-I was 20 minutes (range, 5 to 57 minutes). In 83 women (group I), D-I was ≤30 minutes, and in 28 women (group II), it exceeded 30 minutes. Group I had more neonates with cord pH <7.00, seizures, encephalopathy, and lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes than group II, but were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in neonatal admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or length of stay between the two groups. Maternal complications were higher in group I, but not statistically significant. Although it was achieved in most of the ECDs, the guideline of 30-minute D-I does not seem to improve neonatal nor worsen maternal outcomes.

AB - The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the current guideline of 30-minute decision-to-incision interval (D-I) in emergent cesarean delivery (ECD) on neonatal and maternal outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted of pregnant women who underwent ECDs between January 1999 and December 2001. The overall median D-I was 20 minutes (range, 5 to 57 minutes). In 83 women (group I), D-I was ≤30 minutes, and in 28 women (group II), it exceeded 30 minutes. Group I had more neonates with cord pH <7.00, seizures, encephalopathy, and lower Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes than group II, but were not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in neonatal admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or length of stay between the two groups. Maternal complications were higher in group I, but not statistically significant. Although it was achieved in most of the ECDs, the guideline of 30-minute D-I does not seem to improve neonatal nor worsen maternal outcomes.

KW - Decision-to-incision

KW - Emergency cesarean delivery

KW - Neonatal and maternal outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1442330141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1442330141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-2004-820513

DO - 10.1055/s-2004-820513

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 63

EP - 68

JO - American Journal of Perinatology

JF - American Journal of Perinatology

SN - 0735-1631

IS - 2

ER -