The Association of Departmental Leadership Gender With That of Faculty and Residents in Radiology

Anand Shah, Larissa Braga, Andresa Braga-Baiak, Danny O. Jacobs, Ricardo Pietrobon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: Although the number of women graduating from medical school continues to increase, their representation in radiology residency programs has not increased over the past 10 years. We examined whether the gender of radiology faculty and residents differed according to the gender of the departmental leadership. Materials and Methods: We issued an anonymous Web-based survey via e-mail to all 188 radiology residency program directors listed in the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA Online). Data regarding the gender of the department chairperson, residency program director, faculty, and residents were collected. The institutional review board granted a waiver for this study, and all subjects provided informed consent. Results: Of the 84 program directors who responded, 9 (10.7%) were chaired by females and 75 (89.3%) by males; residency program director positions were held by 36 (42.9%) females and 48 (57.1%) males. More programs were located in the northeastern United States (n = 31, 36.9%) than in any other region, and more were self-described as academic (n = 36, 42.9%) than any other practice type. Programs that were led by a male chairperson had a similar proportion of female faculty (25.2% versus 27.3%; P = .322) and residents (26.2% versus 27.4%; P = .065) compared with those led by a female. Similarly, radiology departments with a male residency program director had a similar proportion of female residents (24.8% versus 28.7%; P = .055) compared with programs with a female residency program director. Conclusion: The gender composition of radiology faculty and residents does not differ significantly according to the gender of the departmental chairperson or residency program director. Nevertheless, there continues to be a disparity in the representation of women among radiology faculty and residents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)998-1003
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Radiology
New England
Research Ethics Committees
Postal Service
Informed Consent
Medical Schools
Databases

Keywords

  • chairperson
  • female faculty
  • female residents
  • gender
  • Radiology
  • residency program director

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

The Association of Departmental Leadership Gender With That of Faculty and Residents in Radiology. / Shah, Anand; Braga, Larissa; Braga-Baiak, Andresa; Jacobs, Danny O.; Pietrobon, Ricardo.

In: Academic Radiology, Vol. 14, No. 8, 08.2007, p. 998-1003.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shah, Anand ; Braga, Larissa ; Braga-Baiak, Andresa ; Jacobs, Danny O. ; Pietrobon, Ricardo. / The Association of Departmental Leadership Gender With That of Faculty and Residents in Radiology. In: Academic Radiology. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 8. pp. 998-1003.
@article{84e3e736f2f747a5a4057db84f2b50a3,
title = "The Association of Departmental Leadership Gender With That of Faculty and Residents in Radiology",
abstract = "Rationale and Objectives: Although the number of women graduating from medical school continues to increase, their representation in radiology residency programs has not increased over the past 10 years. We examined whether the gender of radiology faculty and residents differed according to the gender of the departmental leadership. Materials and Methods: We issued an anonymous Web-based survey via e-mail to all 188 radiology residency program directors listed in the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA Online). Data regarding the gender of the department chairperson, residency program director, faculty, and residents were collected. The institutional review board granted a waiver for this study, and all subjects provided informed consent. Results: Of the 84 program directors who responded, 9 (10.7{\%}) were chaired by females and 75 (89.3{\%}) by males; residency program director positions were held by 36 (42.9{\%}) females and 48 (57.1{\%}) males. More programs were located in the northeastern United States (n = 31, 36.9{\%}) than in any other region, and more were self-described as academic (n = 36, 42.9{\%}) than any other practice type. Programs that were led by a male chairperson had a similar proportion of female faculty (25.2{\%} versus 27.3{\%}; P = .322) and residents (26.2{\%} versus 27.4{\%}; P = .065) compared with those led by a female. Similarly, radiology departments with a male residency program director had a similar proportion of female residents (24.8{\%} versus 28.7{\%}; P = .055) compared with programs with a female residency program director. Conclusion: The gender composition of radiology faculty and residents does not differ significantly according to the gender of the departmental chairperson or residency program director. Nevertheless, there continues to be a disparity in the representation of women among radiology faculty and residents.",
keywords = "chairperson, female faculty, female residents, gender, Radiology, residency program director",
author = "Anand Shah and Larissa Braga and Andresa Braga-Baiak and Jacobs, {Danny O.} and Ricardo Pietrobon",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2007.04.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "998--1003",
journal = "Academic Radiology",
issn = "1076-6332",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Association of Departmental Leadership Gender With That of Faculty and Residents in Radiology

AU - Shah, Anand

AU - Braga, Larissa

AU - Braga-Baiak, Andresa

AU - Jacobs, Danny O.

AU - Pietrobon, Ricardo

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Rationale and Objectives: Although the number of women graduating from medical school continues to increase, their representation in radiology residency programs has not increased over the past 10 years. We examined whether the gender of radiology faculty and residents differed according to the gender of the departmental leadership. Materials and Methods: We issued an anonymous Web-based survey via e-mail to all 188 radiology residency program directors listed in the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA Online). Data regarding the gender of the department chairperson, residency program director, faculty, and residents were collected. The institutional review board granted a waiver for this study, and all subjects provided informed consent. Results: Of the 84 program directors who responded, 9 (10.7%) were chaired by females and 75 (89.3%) by males; residency program director positions were held by 36 (42.9%) females and 48 (57.1%) males. More programs were located in the northeastern United States (n = 31, 36.9%) than in any other region, and more were self-described as academic (n = 36, 42.9%) than any other practice type. Programs that were led by a male chairperson had a similar proportion of female faculty (25.2% versus 27.3%; P = .322) and residents (26.2% versus 27.4%; P = .065) compared with those led by a female. Similarly, radiology departments with a male residency program director had a similar proportion of female residents (24.8% versus 28.7%; P = .055) compared with programs with a female residency program director. Conclusion: The gender composition of radiology faculty and residents does not differ significantly according to the gender of the departmental chairperson or residency program director. Nevertheless, there continues to be a disparity in the representation of women among radiology faculty and residents.

AB - Rationale and Objectives: Although the number of women graduating from medical school continues to increase, their representation in radiology residency programs has not increased over the past 10 years. We examined whether the gender of radiology faculty and residents differed according to the gender of the departmental leadership. Materials and Methods: We issued an anonymous Web-based survey via e-mail to all 188 radiology residency program directors listed in the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA Online). Data regarding the gender of the department chairperson, residency program director, faculty, and residents were collected. The institutional review board granted a waiver for this study, and all subjects provided informed consent. Results: Of the 84 program directors who responded, 9 (10.7%) were chaired by females and 75 (89.3%) by males; residency program director positions were held by 36 (42.9%) females and 48 (57.1%) males. More programs were located in the northeastern United States (n = 31, 36.9%) than in any other region, and more were self-described as academic (n = 36, 42.9%) than any other practice type. Programs that were led by a male chairperson had a similar proportion of female faculty (25.2% versus 27.3%; P = .322) and residents (26.2% versus 27.4%; P = .065) compared with those led by a female. Similarly, radiology departments with a male residency program director had a similar proportion of female residents (24.8% versus 28.7%; P = .055) compared with programs with a female residency program director. Conclusion: The gender composition of radiology faculty and residents does not differ significantly according to the gender of the departmental chairperson or residency program director. Nevertheless, there continues to be a disparity in the representation of women among radiology faculty and residents.

KW - chairperson

KW - female faculty

KW - female residents

KW - gender

KW - Radiology

KW - residency program director

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447308492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447308492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2007.04.017

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2007.04.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 17659246

AN - SCOPUS:34447308492

VL - 14

SP - 998

EP - 1003

JO - Academic Radiology

JF - Academic Radiology

SN - 1076-6332

IS - 8

ER -