The Austrian Breast Implant Register

Recent Trends in Implant-Based Breast Surgery

Paul Wurzer, Thomas Rappl, Herwig Friedl, Lars Peter Kamolz, Stephan Spendel, Helmut Hoflehner, Daryousch Parvizi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Due to the fact that the number of breast implant surgeries for cosmetic and medical purposes is rising yearly, a discussion about the quality of service for both patients and physicians is more important than ever. To this end, we reviewed the Austrian Breast Implant Register with one specific question in mind: What are the trends?

Materials and Methods: In the statistical analysis of the Austrian Breast Implant Register, we were able to identify 13,112 registered breast implants between 2004 and 2012. The whole dataset was then divided into medical and cosmetic groups. We focused on device size, surface characteristics, filling material, device placement and incision site. All factors were considered for all examined years.

Results: In summary, the most used device had a textured surface (97 %) and silicone gel as the filling material (93 %). The mean size of implants for the cosmetic group was 240 cc, placement was submuscular (58 %) and the incision site was inframammary (67 %). In the medical group, the mean size was 250 cc. Yearly registrations had their peak in 2008 (1,898 registered devices); from this year on, registrations decreased annually. A slight trend away from subglandular placement in the cosmetic group was noted. Also, the usage of implants with polyurethane surface characteristics has increased since 2008. The smooth surface implants had a peak usage in 2006 and their usage decreased steadily from then on whereas the textured surface was steady over the years.

Discussion and Conclusion: Keeping the problems related to the quality of breast implants in mind, we could recommend an obligatory national register. Organisations of surgeons and governments should develop and establish these registers. Furthermore, an all-encompassing international register should be established by the European Union and the American FDA (Food and Drug Administration); this might be useful in comparing the individual country registers and also would help in delivering “evidence based” medicine in cosmetic and medical procedures.

Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1109-1115
Number of pages7
JournalAesthetic Plastic Surgery
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breast Implants
Cosmetics
Equipment and Supplies
Evidence-Based Medicine
Silicone Gels
Polyurethanes
European Union
United States Food and Drug Administration
Plastic Surgery
Organizations
Physicians

Keywords

  • Breast implant
  • Breast surgery
  • Quality service
  • Register
  • Silicone prosthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Wurzer, P., Rappl, T., Friedl, H., Kamolz, L. P., Spendel, S., Hoflehner, H., & Parvizi, D. (2014). The Austrian Breast Implant Register: Recent Trends in Implant-Based Breast Surgery. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 38(6), 1109-1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0407-2

The Austrian Breast Implant Register : Recent Trends in Implant-Based Breast Surgery. / Wurzer, Paul; Rappl, Thomas; Friedl, Herwig; Kamolz, Lars Peter; Spendel, Stephan; Hoflehner, Helmut; Parvizi, Daryousch.

In: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2014, p. 1109-1115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wurzer, P, Rappl, T, Friedl, H, Kamolz, LP, Spendel, S, Hoflehner, H & Parvizi, D 2014, 'The Austrian Breast Implant Register: Recent Trends in Implant-Based Breast Surgery', Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1109-1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0407-2
Wurzer, Paul ; Rappl, Thomas ; Friedl, Herwig ; Kamolz, Lars Peter ; Spendel, Stephan ; Hoflehner, Helmut ; Parvizi, Daryousch. / The Austrian Breast Implant Register : Recent Trends in Implant-Based Breast Surgery. In: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 1109-1115.
@article{9986170784724b74a580a42ab776fb61,
title = "The Austrian Breast Implant Register: Recent Trends in Implant-Based Breast Surgery",
abstract = "Introduction: Due to the fact that the number of breast implant surgeries for cosmetic and medical purposes is rising yearly, a discussion about the quality of service for both patients and physicians is more important than ever. To this end, we reviewed the Austrian Breast Implant Register with one specific question in mind: What are the trends?Materials and Methods: In the statistical analysis of the Austrian Breast Implant Register, we were able to identify 13,112 registered breast implants between 2004 and 2012. The whole dataset was then divided into medical and cosmetic groups. We focused on device size, surface characteristics, filling material, device placement and incision site. All factors were considered for all examined years.Results: In summary, the most used device had a textured surface (97 {\%}) and silicone gel as the filling material (93 {\%}). The mean size of implants for the cosmetic group was 240 cc, placement was submuscular (58 {\%}) and the incision site was inframammary (67 {\%}). In the medical group, the mean size was 250 cc. Yearly registrations had their peak in 2008 (1,898 registered devices); from this year on, registrations decreased annually. A slight trend away from subglandular placement in the cosmetic group was noted. Also, the usage of implants with polyurethane surface characteristics has increased since 2008. The smooth surface implants had a peak usage in 2006 and their usage decreased steadily from then on whereas the textured surface was steady over the years.Discussion and Conclusion: Keeping the problems related to the quality of breast implants in mind, we could recommend an obligatory national register. Organisations of surgeons and governments should develop and establish these registers. Furthermore, an all-encompassing international register should be established by the European Union and the American FDA (Food and Drug Administration); this might be useful in comparing the individual country registers and also would help in delivering “evidence based” medicine in cosmetic and medical procedures.Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.",
keywords = "Breast implant, Breast surgery, Quality service, Register, Silicone prosthesis",
author = "Paul Wurzer and Thomas Rappl and Herwig Friedl and Kamolz, {Lars Peter} and Stephan Spendel and Helmut Hoflehner and Daryousch Parvizi",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s00266-014-0407-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1109--1115",
journal = "Aesthetic Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0364-216X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Austrian Breast Implant Register

T2 - Recent Trends in Implant-Based Breast Surgery

AU - Wurzer, Paul

AU - Rappl, Thomas

AU - Friedl, Herwig

AU - Kamolz, Lars Peter

AU - Spendel, Stephan

AU - Hoflehner, Helmut

AU - Parvizi, Daryousch

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Introduction: Due to the fact that the number of breast implant surgeries for cosmetic and medical purposes is rising yearly, a discussion about the quality of service for both patients and physicians is more important than ever. To this end, we reviewed the Austrian Breast Implant Register with one specific question in mind: What are the trends?Materials and Methods: In the statistical analysis of the Austrian Breast Implant Register, we were able to identify 13,112 registered breast implants between 2004 and 2012. The whole dataset was then divided into medical and cosmetic groups. We focused on device size, surface characteristics, filling material, device placement and incision site. All factors were considered for all examined years.Results: In summary, the most used device had a textured surface (97 %) and silicone gel as the filling material (93 %). The mean size of implants for the cosmetic group was 240 cc, placement was submuscular (58 %) and the incision site was inframammary (67 %). In the medical group, the mean size was 250 cc. Yearly registrations had their peak in 2008 (1,898 registered devices); from this year on, registrations decreased annually. A slight trend away from subglandular placement in the cosmetic group was noted. Also, the usage of implants with polyurethane surface characteristics has increased since 2008. The smooth surface implants had a peak usage in 2006 and their usage decreased steadily from then on whereas the textured surface was steady over the years.Discussion and Conclusion: Keeping the problems related to the quality of breast implants in mind, we could recommend an obligatory national register. Organisations of surgeons and governments should develop and establish these registers. Furthermore, an all-encompassing international register should be established by the European Union and the American FDA (Food and Drug Administration); this might be useful in comparing the individual country registers and also would help in delivering “evidence based” medicine in cosmetic and medical procedures.Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

AB - Introduction: Due to the fact that the number of breast implant surgeries for cosmetic and medical purposes is rising yearly, a discussion about the quality of service for both patients and physicians is more important than ever. To this end, we reviewed the Austrian Breast Implant Register with one specific question in mind: What are the trends?Materials and Methods: In the statistical analysis of the Austrian Breast Implant Register, we were able to identify 13,112 registered breast implants between 2004 and 2012. The whole dataset was then divided into medical and cosmetic groups. We focused on device size, surface characteristics, filling material, device placement and incision site. All factors were considered for all examined years.Results: In summary, the most used device had a textured surface (97 %) and silicone gel as the filling material (93 %). The mean size of implants for the cosmetic group was 240 cc, placement was submuscular (58 %) and the incision site was inframammary (67 %). In the medical group, the mean size was 250 cc. Yearly registrations had their peak in 2008 (1,898 registered devices); from this year on, registrations decreased annually. A slight trend away from subglandular placement in the cosmetic group was noted. Also, the usage of implants with polyurethane surface characteristics has increased since 2008. The smooth surface implants had a peak usage in 2006 and their usage decreased steadily from then on whereas the textured surface was steady over the years.Discussion and Conclusion: Keeping the problems related to the quality of breast implants in mind, we could recommend an obligatory national register. Organisations of surgeons and governments should develop and establish these registers. Furthermore, an all-encompassing international register should be established by the European Union and the American FDA (Food and Drug Administration); this might be useful in comparing the individual country registers and also would help in delivering “evidence based” medicine in cosmetic and medical procedures.Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

KW - Breast implant

KW - Breast surgery

KW - Quality service

KW - Register

KW - Silicone prosthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922080282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922080282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00266-014-0407-2

DO - 10.1007/s00266-014-0407-2

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1109

EP - 1115

JO - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

JF - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

SN - 0364-216X

IS - 6

ER -