The Baux score is dead. Long live the Baux score

A 27-year retrospective cohort study of mortality at a regional burns service

Geoffrey Roberts, Mark Lloyd, Mike Parker, Rebecca Martin, Bruce Philp, Odhran Shelley, Peter Dziewulski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess trends in mortality after burn injuries treated in a regional specialist burns service between 1982 and 2008. METHODS: Patient and burn-specific information and mortality were collated from written admission ledgers and the hospital coding department for 11,109 patients. The data set was divided into age cohorts (0 -14, 15- 44, 45- 64, and <65 years) and time cohorts (1982-1991, 1992-2000, and 2000 -2008). Lethal area 50 (LA50) was calculated by logistic regression and probit analysis. Mortality was related to the Baux score (age + total %burned surface area) by logistic regression. RESULTS: In the time period 2000 to 2008, the LA50 values with approximate 95%confidence intervals (CIs) were 100%(CI, 85.5-100%) in the 0 to 14 cohort (LA10, 78.3%; CI, 64.1-92.5%), 76.4%(CI, 69.1- 83.8%) in the 15 to 44 cohort, 58.6%(CI, 50.8 - 66.5%) in the 45 to 64 cohort, and 30.8%(CI, 24.7-36.9%) in the <65 cohort. The point of futility (the Baux Score at which predicted mortality is 100%) was 160 and the Baux50 (the Baux score at which predicted mortality is 50%) was 109.6 (CI, 105.9 -113.4) in the 2000 to 2008 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality is markedly improved over earlier data from this study and other historical series and compares favorably with outcomes published from the US National Burn Repository. The Baux Score continues to provide an indication of the risk of mortality. Survival after major burn injury is increasingly common, and decisions by nonspecialist about initial triage, management, and futility of care should be made after consultation with a specialist burn service.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-256
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Burns
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Confidence Intervals
Mortality
Medical Futility
Logistic Models
Triage
Hospital Departments
Wounds and Injuries
Referral and Consultation
Regression Analysis
Survival

Keywords

  • Burn
  • LA51
  • Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

The Baux score is dead. Long live the Baux score : A 27-year retrospective cohort study of mortality at a regional burns service. / Roberts, Geoffrey; Lloyd, Mark; Parker, Mike; Martin, Rebecca; Philp, Bruce; Shelley, Odhran; Dziewulski, Peter.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 72, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 251-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roberts, Geoffrey ; Lloyd, Mark ; Parker, Mike ; Martin, Rebecca ; Philp, Bruce ; Shelley, Odhran ; Dziewulski, Peter. / The Baux score is dead. Long live the Baux score : A 27-year retrospective cohort study of mortality at a regional burns service. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 72, No. 1. pp. 251-256.
@article{14d19308bb754b978349fac86fc0699a,
title = "The Baux score is dead. Long live the Baux score: A 27-year retrospective cohort study of mortality at a regional burns service",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: To assess trends in mortality after burn injuries treated in a regional specialist burns service between 1982 and 2008. METHODS: Patient and burn-specific information and mortality were collated from written admission ledgers and the hospital coding department for 11,109 patients. The data set was divided into age cohorts (0 -14, 15- 44, 45- 64, and <65 years) and time cohorts (1982-1991, 1992-2000, and 2000 -2008). Lethal area 50 (LA50) was calculated by logistic regression and probit analysis. Mortality was related to the Baux score (age + total {\%}burned surface area) by logistic regression. RESULTS: In the time period 2000 to 2008, the LA50 values with approximate 95{\%}confidence intervals (CIs) were 100{\%}(CI, 85.5-100{\%}) in the 0 to 14 cohort (LA10, 78.3{\%}; CI, 64.1-92.5{\%}), 76.4{\%}(CI, 69.1- 83.8{\%}) in the 15 to 44 cohort, 58.6{\%}(CI, 50.8 - 66.5{\%}) in the 45 to 64 cohort, and 30.8{\%}(CI, 24.7-36.9{\%}) in the <65 cohort. The point of futility (the Baux Score at which predicted mortality is 100{\%}) was 160 and the Baux50 (the Baux score at which predicted mortality is 50{\%}) was 109.6 (CI, 105.9 -113.4) in the 2000 to 2008 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality is markedly improved over earlier data from this study and other historical series and compares favorably with outcomes published from the US National Burn Repository. The Baux Score continues to provide an indication of the risk of mortality. Survival after major burn injury is increasingly common, and decisions by nonspecialist about initial triage, management, and futility of care should be made after consultation with a specialist burn service.",
keywords = "Burn, LA51, Mortality",
author = "Geoffrey Roberts and Mark Lloyd and Mike Parker and Rebecca Martin and Bruce Philp and Odhran Shelley and Peter Dziewulski",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e31824052bb",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "251--256",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Baux score is dead. Long live the Baux score

T2 - A 27-year retrospective cohort study of mortality at a regional burns service

AU - Roberts, Geoffrey

AU - Lloyd, Mark

AU - Parker, Mike

AU - Martin, Rebecca

AU - Philp, Bruce

AU - Shelley, Odhran

AU - Dziewulski, Peter

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: To assess trends in mortality after burn injuries treated in a regional specialist burns service between 1982 and 2008. METHODS: Patient and burn-specific information and mortality were collated from written admission ledgers and the hospital coding department for 11,109 patients. The data set was divided into age cohorts (0 -14, 15- 44, 45- 64, and <65 years) and time cohorts (1982-1991, 1992-2000, and 2000 -2008). Lethal area 50 (LA50) was calculated by logistic regression and probit analysis. Mortality was related to the Baux score (age + total %burned surface area) by logistic regression. RESULTS: In the time period 2000 to 2008, the LA50 values with approximate 95%confidence intervals (CIs) were 100%(CI, 85.5-100%) in the 0 to 14 cohort (LA10, 78.3%; CI, 64.1-92.5%), 76.4%(CI, 69.1- 83.8%) in the 15 to 44 cohort, 58.6%(CI, 50.8 - 66.5%) in the 45 to 64 cohort, and 30.8%(CI, 24.7-36.9%) in the <65 cohort. The point of futility (the Baux Score at which predicted mortality is 100%) was 160 and the Baux50 (the Baux score at which predicted mortality is 50%) was 109.6 (CI, 105.9 -113.4) in the 2000 to 2008 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality is markedly improved over earlier data from this study and other historical series and compares favorably with outcomes published from the US National Burn Repository. The Baux Score continues to provide an indication of the risk of mortality. Survival after major burn injury is increasingly common, and decisions by nonspecialist about initial triage, management, and futility of care should be made after consultation with a specialist burn service.

AB - BACKGROUND: To assess trends in mortality after burn injuries treated in a regional specialist burns service between 1982 and 2008. METHODS: Patient and burn-specific information and mortality were collated from written admission ledgers and the hospital coding department for 11,109 patients. The data set was divided into age cohorts (0 -14, 15- 44, 45- 64, and <65 years) and time cohorts (1982-1991, 1992-2000, and 2000 -2008). Lethal area 50 (LA50) was calculated by logistic regression and probit analysis. Mortality was related to the Baux score (age + total %burned surface area) by logistic regression. RESULTS: In the time period 2000 to 2008, the LA50 values with approximate 95%confidence intervals (CIs) were 100%(CI, 85.5-100%) in the 0 to 14 cohort (LA10, 78.3%; CI, 64.1-92.5%), 76.4%(CI, 69.1- 83.8%) in the 15 to 44 cohort, 58.6%(CI, 50.8 - 66.5%) in the 45 to 64 cohort, and 30.8%(CI, 24.7-36.9%) in the <65 cohort. The point of futility (the Baux Score at which predicted mortality is 100%) was 160 and the Baux50 (the Baux score at which predicted mortality is 50%) was 109.6 (CI, 105.9 -113.4) in the 2000 to 2008 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality is markedly improved over earlier data from this study and other historical series and compares favorably with outcomes published from the US National Burn Repository. The Baux Score continues to provide an indication of the risk of mortality. Survival after major burn injury is increasingly common, and decisions by nonspecialist about initial triage, management, and futility of care should be made after consultation with a specialist burn service.

KW - Burn

KW - LA51

KW - Mortality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859631005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859631005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824052bb

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824052bb

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 251

EP - 256

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -