The clinical significance of eosinophils in the amniotic fluid in preterm labor

Roberto Romero, Juan Pedro Kusanovic, Ricardo Gomez, Ronald Lamont, Egle Bytautiene, Robert E. Garfield, Pooja Mittal, Sonia S. Hassan, Lami Yeo

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    18 Scopus citations


    Objective.White blood cells are not traditionally considered to be normally present in amniotic fluid. This study was conducted after the observation that a patient with preterm labor and intact membranes had eosinophils as a predominant cell in the amniotic fluid, and had an episode of asthma during the index pregnancy. The goal of this study was to determine whether women presenting with preterm labor with eosinophils in the amniotic fluid had a different outcome than those without eosinophils as the predominant white blood cell in the amniotic cavity. Methods.This retrospective casecontrol study included women who presented with preterm labor and intact membranes between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Patients underwent an amniocentesis shortly after admission for the assessment of the microbiologic status of the amniotic cavity and/or fetal lung maturity. Amniotic fluid was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as genital mycoplasmas. Cytologic studies included amniotic fluid white blood cell count and differential, which was performed on cytocentrifuged specimens. Patients with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and/or an amniotic fluid white blood cell count >20 cells/mm 3 were excluded from the study. Cases were defined as women in whom the differential contained >20 of eosinophils. Controls were selected among women with an amniotic fluid eosinophil count ≤20 and matched for gestational age at amniocentesis. The analysis was conducted with non-parametric statistics. Results.The study population consisted of 10 cases and 50 controls. Gestational age and cervical dilatation at admission were similar in both groups. Cases had a lower gestational age at delivery than controls [34.6 weeks, inter-quartile range (IQR) 3237.3 weeks vs. 38.0 weeks, IQR 3540 weeks, respectively; p0.018]. The prevalence of preterm delivery ≤35 weeks was higher among patients who had >20 eosinophils than in the control group [50 (5/10) vs. 18 (9/50), respectively; p0.029]. Similar results were observed for delivery at <37 weeks [cases: 70 (7/10) vs. controls: 36 (18/50); p0.046]. Conclusions.Women with preterm labor and intact membranes who have a large proportion of eosinophils in the amniotic fluid are at an increased risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. These patients may have had an episode of preterm labor related to a type I hypersensitivity reaction.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)320-329
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
    Issue number4
    StatePublished - Apr 2010


    • Allergy
    • Allergy-induced preterm labor
    • Amniotic fluid cells
    • Amniotic fluid white blood cells
    • Atopy
    • Labor
    • Mast cells
    • Parturition
    • Pregnancy
    • Premature birth
    • Premature labor
    • Prematurity
    • Preterm birth
    • Type I hypersensitivity reaction

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The clinical significance of eosinophils in the amniotic fluid in preterm labor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this