The Clinician-Investigator

Unavoidable but Manageable Tension

Howard Brody, Franklin G. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The "difference position" holds that clinical research and therapeutic medical practice are sufficiently distinct activities to require different ethical rules and principles. The "similarity position" holds instead that clinical investigators ought to be bound by the same fundamental principles that govern therapeutic medicine - specifically, a duty to provide the optimal therapeutic benefit to each patient or subject. Some defenders of the similarity position defend it because of the overlap between the role of attending physician and the role of investigator in a research trial. This overlap is maximal when the same physician occupies both roles with respect to a particular patient-subject. We address the ethical tensions inherent in that role conflict and argue that the tensions are real but manageable. The difference position provides a sound ethical framework within which to manage those tensions, while the similarity position is unsatisfactory because it seeks to deny the existence of the tensions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-346
Number of pages18
JournalKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Volume13
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

physician
Research Personnel
Therapeutic Human Experimentation
Physician's Role
role conflict
medical practice
Biomedical Research
Medicine
medicine
Physicians
Therapeutics
Research
Clinicians
Conflict (Psychology)
Overlap

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The Clinician-Investigator : Unavoidable but Manageable Tension. / Brody, Howard; Miller, Franklin G.

In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, 12.2003, p. 329-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brody, Howard ; Miller, Franklin G. / The Clinician-Investigator : Unavoidable but Manageable Tension. In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2003 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 329-346.
@article{8c0845b7e6af44b59d9e6e8c52ae823d,
title = "The Clinician-Investigator: Unavoidable but Manageable Tension",
abstract = "The {"}difference position{"} holds that clinical research and therapeutic medical practice are sufficiently distinct activities to require different ethical rules and principles. The {"}similarity position{"} holds instead that clinical investigators ought to be bound by the same fundamental principles that govern therapeutic medicine - specifically, a duty to provide the optimal therapeutic benefit to each patient or subject. Some defenders of the similarity position defend it because of the overlap between the role of attending physician and the role of investigator in a research trial. This overlap is maximal when the same physician occupies both roles with respect to a particular patient-subject. We address the ethical tensions inherent in that role conflict and argue that the tensions are real but manageable. The difference position provides a sound ethical framework within which to manage those tensions, while the similarity position is unsatisfactory because it seeks to deny the existence of the tensions.",
author = "Howard Brody and Miller, {Franklin G.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "329--346",
journal = "Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal",
issn = "1054-6863",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Clinician-Investigator

T2 - Unavoidable but Manageable Tension

AU - Brody, Howard

AU - Miller, Franklin G.

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - The "difference position" holds that clinical research and therapeutic medical practice are sufficiently distinct activities to require different ethical rules and principles. The "similarity position" holds instead that clinical investigators ought to be bound by the same fundamental principles that govern therapeutic medicine - specifically, a duty to provide the optimal therapeutic benefit to each patient or subject. Some defenders of the similarity position defend it because of the overlap between the role of attending physician and the role of investigator in a research trial. This overlap is maximal when the same physician occupies both roles with respect to a particular patient-subject. We address the ethical tensions inherent in that role conflict and argue that the tensions are real but manageable. The difference position provides a sound ethical framework within which to manage those tensions, while the similarity position is unsatisfactory because it seeks to deny the existence of the tensions.

AB - The "difference position" holds that clinical research and therapeutic medical practice are sufficiently distinct activities to require different ethical rules and principles. The "similarity position" holds instead that clinical investigators ought to be bound by the same fundamental principles that govern therapeutic medicine - specifically, a duty to provide the optimal therapeutic benefit to each patient or subject. Some defenders of the similarity position defend it because of the overlap between the role of attending physician and the role of investigator in a research trial. This overlap is maximal when the same physician occupies both roles with respect to a particular patient-subject. We address the ethical tensions inherent in that role conflict and argue that the tensions are real but manageable. The difference position provides a sound ethical framework within which to manage those tensions, while the similarity position is unsatisfactory because it seeks to deny the existence of the tensions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0842264331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0842264331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 329

EP - 346

JO - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

JF - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

SN - 1054-6863

IS - 4

ER -